18 votes available
10 votes needed to lynch
Deadline: (expired on 2013-11-16 01:57:51)
Thanks for explaining my thoughts better than I can.In post 2695, PeregrineV wrote:The lack of more than one NK last night could be for multiple things. Since an RB didn't declare a target, then we can hope for a doc, or that mafia tried to NK Pie and he's got some BP protection.
And if that's the case (and even if not), scum would rather see the SK lynched than taking him out themselves. Why would they want to waste one of their plays which move them towards their wincon when they can use the town's lynch to do so?
So, I seemore scum motivation to push Pie's lynch hardcore for scum than I see for town. We know we're fighting an uphill battle, but frankly a mislynch and NK is normal mafia, so I don't even feel we are behind. As a matter of fact, we are actually ahead because we caught the SK, and they are usually pains in the asses to find and catch.A WHOLE LOT
And we are doubly ahead, since the SK is acting as the town vig and cleaning up the fringes. Since there will be scum in the fringes, this will work.
With that said, aside from Wake and Majiffy pushing the Pie lynch, there are going to be the "silent" partners. They are going for the SK lynch lynch because hey, it ain't them, but they will also not risk all the scumteam on pushing for the SK lynch.
So, first I'll look at that and the other dissolving wagons of day1 and day2.
This is one of the few times I've actually gotten angry in a game.In post 2697, Svenskt Stål wrote:I like this.In post 2695, PeregrineV wrote:The lack of more than one NK last night could be for multiple things. Since an RB didn't declare a target, then we can hope for a doc, or that mafia tried to NK Pie and he's got some BP protection.
And if that's the case (and even if not), scum would rather see the SK lynched than taking him out themselves. Why would they want to waste one of their plays which move them towards their wincon when they can use the town's lynch to do so?
So, I seemore scum motivation to push Pie's lynch hardcore for scum than I see for town. We know we're fighting an uphill battle, but frankly a mislynch and NK is normal mafia, so I don't even feel we are behind. As a matter of fact, we are actually ahead because we caught the SK, and they are usually pains in the asses to find and catch.A WHOLE LOT
And we are doubly ahead, since the SK is acting as the town vig and cleaning up the fringes. Since there will be scum in the fringes, this will work.
With that said, aside from Wake and Majiffy pushing the Pie lynch, there are going to be the "silent" partners. They are going for the SK lynch lynch because hey, it ain't them, but they will also not risk all the scumteam on pushing for the SK lynch.
So, first I'll look at that and the other dissolving wagons of day1 and day2.
UNVOTE:
But we need to have a list by end of day, posted by someone that is town in almost everyones eyes, that pie has to follow.
Wow. Ego, much?In post 2702, Wake1 wrote:If I cannot get enough leverage to lynch the supposed Serial Killer, then I should be the one to control him. I already foresee select suspects disagreeing with it. Let me control him, and I will make sure we have more-than-made-up our minds to use him. We also need to decide when we should lynch him, too.
And in the interest of fair and balanced reporting, Levi response: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 6#p5413916In post 2698, Svenskt Stål wrote:sorry for being lazy but can you link thisIn post 2696, PeregrineV wrote:And what's the defense of Levi again?
His neighbor comes in the thread calling him scum and he says nothing?
That is in no way a town reaction.
Same reason I don't often buy it when a town claims PR but "forgets" thier action. It happens, but town not using what they have is extra damaging. Levi was scummy day1, and his answer coming in looks like he doesn't care all that much.In post 2706, Svenskt Stål wrote:i can buy levi´s explanation, why cant you?
OK, then besides you wanting to the lynch the SK as the anti-Christ, do you think there is any scum on his wagon?In post 2702, Wake1 wrote:This is one of the few times I've actually gotten angry in a game.In post 2697, Svenskt Stål wrote:I like this.In post 2695, PeregrineV wrote:The lack of more than one NK last night could be for multiple things. Since an RB didn't declare a target, then we can hope for a doc, or that mafia tried to NK Pie and he's got some BP protection.
And if that's the case (and even if not), scum would rather see the SK lynched than taking him out themselves. Why would they want to waste one of their plays which move them towards their wincon when they can use the town's lynch to do so?
So, I seemore scum motivation to push Pie's lynch hardcore for scum than I see for town. We know we're fighting an uphill battle, but frankly a mislynch and NK is normal mafia, so I don't even feel we are behind. As a matter of fact, we are actually ahead because we caught the SK, and they are usually pains in the asses to find and catch.A WHOLE LOT
And we are doubly ahead, since the SK is acting as the town vig and cleaning up the fringes. Since there will be scum in the fringes, this will work.
With that said, aside from Wake and Majiffy pushing the Pie lynch, there are going to be the "silent" partners. They are going for the SK lynch lynch because hey, it ain't them, but they will also not risk all the scumteam on pushing for the SK lynch.
So, first I'll look at that and the other dissolving wagons of day1 and day2.
UNVOTE:
But we need to have a list by end of day, posted by someone that is town in almost everyones eyes, that pie has to follow.
I am the Town Tracker, and I am perceived by more than a few as Town.
If I cannot get enough leverage to lynch the supposed Serial Killer, then I should be the one to control him. I already foresee select suspects disagreeing with it. Let me control him, and I will make sure we have more-than-made-up our minds to use him. We also need to decide when we should lynch him, too.
Ah, but if the scum do have a doc(a fact I think they don't right now), then a pool is better. As it stands, I think a single target is probably fine.In post 2707, Titus wrote:Sakura, Pie's response was self preservationist because she pretty much said to me, "I willshootwithin one target but I would rather have a pool so I can always hit town."
A misconception we must clear. While I did say I was "reaction testing" in regards to the votes we discussed earlier, it was truthfully not my intention--I recommend you (re)read the events leading up to my vote swaps: I had multiple sheeping my vote for most of the early day one, which meant by definition I had to jump from wagon to wagon to utilize my obvtown status(seriously, go check how many times someone calls me obvtown in the early game, even I was objecting to it).Stal's wagon sucks sorry.Natiis a much better wagon if you are not in favor of leashing the SK. Nati votes anyone but confscum. She has to reaction test others but knows the SK is fine without reaction testing.No oneshould believe that.
understood. but why cant he just have been busy?In post 2708, PeregrineV wrote:Same reason I don't often buy it when a town claims PR but "forgets" thier action. It happens, but town not using what they have is extra damaging. Levi was scummy day1, and his answer coming in looks like he doesn't care all that much.In post 2706, Svenskt Stål wrote:i can buy levi´s explanation, why cant you?
Don't misunderstand.In post 2707, Titus wrote:Sakura, Pie's response was self preservationist because she pretty much said to me, "I willshootwithin one target but I would rather have a pool so I can always hit town."
Wake? You don't trust the SK at all but you trust him enough to be the one to leash him. What the fuck? Either you trust himoryou don't.
Stal's wagon sucks sorry.Natiis a much better wagon if you are not in favor of leashing the SK. Nati votes anyone but confscum. She has to reaction test others but knows the SK is fine without reaction testing.No oneshould believe that.
I will catch up on the rest later.
Does this mean you intend to track him?In post 2712, Wake1 wrote:Don't misunderstand.In post 2707, Titus wrote:Sakura, Pie's response was self preservationist because she pretty much said to me, "I willshootwithin one target but I would rather have a pool so I can always hit town."
Wake? You don't trust the SK at all but you trust him enough to be the one to leash him. What the fuck? Either you trust himoryou don't.
Stal's wagon sucks sorry.Natiis a much better wagon if you are not in favor of leashing the SK. Nati votes anyone but confscum. She has to reaction test others but knows the SK is fine without reaction testing.No oneshould believe that.
I will catch up on the rest later.
I want the SK dead, but if I can't because you won't let me, then aloow me to shackle him and keep a damned good eye on him. I don't trust him, but can't get him lynched so easily with bad-Town, so let me have him as my prisoner.
That's what he said. Do you believe him?In post 2711, Svenskt Stål wrote:understood. but why cant he just have been busy?In post 2708, PeregrineV wrote:Same reason I don't often buy it when a town claims PR but "forgets" thier action. It happens, but town not using what they have is extra damaging. Levi was scummy day1, and his answer coming in looks like he doesn't care all that much.In post 2706, Svenskt Stål wrote:i can buy levi´s explanation, why cant you?
Wake, I just wanna say that you need to take a step back and realize that while you might've played mafia for 6+ years, the people in this game(and on this site in general) do not know you and have no reason to believe you are anyone important or that your opinions are actually useful. I'm sorry, but it has to be said. To us, you're nothing but another newb. I'm begging you--please get some self-awareness and prove to use that you are a player worth your salt.In post 2713, Wake1 wrote:Those who make excuses to not join my wagon against SK, AND wrinkle their noses at me shackling/controlling SK... are either Scum or horrid Town.