Mobile Suit Gundam SEED Mafia - Game Over

Svenskt Stål · Post Post #2725 (ISO) » Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:13 am

so your scummy gut huch is maybee a town tell and curious

Natirasha · Post Post #2726 (ISO) » Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:16 am

In post 2725, Svenskt Stål wrote:so your scummy gut huch is maybee a town tell and curious

It's a debated confused tell and a curious, to be specific.

Svenskt Stål · Post Post #2727 (ISO) » Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:18 am

allright, i like the mystic aura you are giving me.

who do you want to lynch

kanyeknowsbest · Post Post #2728 (ISO) » Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:26 am

In post 2702, Wake1 wrote:
In post 2697, Svenskt Stål wrote:
In post 2695, PeregrineV wrote:The lack of more than one NK last night could be for multiple things. Since an RB didn't declare a target, then we can hope for a doc, or that mafia tried to NK Pie and he's got some BP protection.

And if that's the case (and even if not), scum would rather see the SK lynched than taking him out themselves. Why would they want to waste one of their plays which move them towards their wincon when they can use the town's lynch to do so?

So, I see
A WHOLE LOT
more scum motivation to push Pie's lynch hardcore for scum than I see for town. We know we're fighting an uphill battle, but frankly a mislynch and NK is normal mafia, so I don't even feel we are behind. As a matter of fact, we are actually ahead because we caught the SK, and they are usually pains in the asses to find and catch.

And we are doubly ahead, since the SK is acting as the town vig and cleaning up the fringes. Since there will be scum in the fringes, this will work.

With that said, aside from Wake and Majiffy pushing the Pie lynch, there are going to be the "silent" partners. They are going for the SK lynch lynch because hey, it ain't them, but they will also not risk all the scumteam on pushing for the SK lynch.

So, first I'll look at that and the other dissolving wagons of day1 and day2.
I like this.

UNVOTE:

But we need to have a list by end of day, posted by someone that is town in almost everyones eyes, that pie has to follow.
This is one of the few times I've actually gotten angry in a game.

I am the Town Tracker, and I am perceived by more than a few as Town.

If I cannot get enough leverage to lynch the supposed Serial Killer, then I should be the one to control him. I already foresee select suspects disagreeing with it. Let me control him, and I will make sure we have more-than-made-up our minds to use him. We also need to decide when we should lynch him, too.

lol

Empking · Post Post #2729 (ISO) » Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:33 am

Nat is probably scum. Pie might actually be scum with him.

Titus · Post Post #2730 (ISO) » Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:44 am

Empking, why didn't you vote them then?

VOTE: Pie

I want to see if Wake has some scumhunting ability beyond do what I want or you are scum. Also, I don't trust Pie at all.

pieguyn · Post Post #2731 (ISO) » Mon Oct 28, 2013 8:06 am

In post 2707, Titus wrote:
Sakura
, Pie's response was self preservationist because she pretty much said to me, "I will
shoot
within one target but I would rather have a pool so I can always hit town."

plz tell me where the flying fuck I ever said that. wow you and your teammates are reaching really hard to get me lynched

Empking · Post Post #2732 (ISO) » Mon Oct 28, 2013 8:20 am

In post 2730, Titus wrote:Empking, why didn't you vote them then?

I am.

Majiffy · Post Post #2733 (ISO) » Mon Oct 28, 2013 8:24 am

asdghf

We need to be lynching Pie and all alternatives are not truly alternatives.

Thanks.

Titus · Post Post #2734 (ISO) » Mon Oct 28, 2013 8:26 am

Sorry Empking. You were.

@Pie, it should be clear my quote was a paraphrase of how I viewed your response rather than verbatim quote of 2659.

NachoKoopa · Post Post #2735 (ISO) » Mon Oct 28, 2013 9:36 am

In post 2729, Empking wrote:Nat is probably scum. Pie might actually be scum with him.

You're buying into that shit too?

Titus · Post Post #2736 (ISO) » Mon Oct 28, 2013 9:38 am

That's Natirasha not you Nacho. Nati's voted everything with a pulse but the SK.

NachoKoopa · Post Post #2737 (ISO) » Mon Oct 28, 2013 10:27 am

I was referring to the Pie = mafia theory that is floating around.

Majiffy · Post Post #2738 (ISO) » Mon Oct 28, 2013 10:29 am

It's not a bad theory.

You'll all bow down to Master Majiffy when he flips faction PR and I was right all the way back on page 10 or whatever when he claimed vig.

NachoKoopa · Post Post #2739 (ISO) » Mon Oct 28, 2013 10:31 am

And when he ends up being SK, no one will bow down to me for noticing the obvious.

Empking · Post Post #2740 (ISO) » Mon Oct 28, 2013 10:31 am

In post 2735, NachoKoopa wrote:
In post 2729, Empking wrote:Nat is probably scum. Pie might actually be scum with him.
You're buying into that shit too?

It doesn't impact my vote (I voted him for being a SK), but I can't say I'd be shocked if he flipped mafia either.

Natirasha · Post Post #2741 (ISO) » Mon Oct 28, 2013 10:32 am

In post 2729, Empking wrote:Nat is probably scum. Pie might actually be scum with him.

Do you do stuff?

Titus · Post Post #2742 (ISO) » Mon Oct 28, 2013 10:41 am

Is anyone on vla? If not, we can set a deadline of 48 hours to talk or forever hold your peace regarding the pie lynch?

waynegg · Post Post #2743 (ISO) » Mon Oct 28, 2013 12:17 pm

In post 2686, Svenskt Stål wrote:Wayne, lets form a work group

Idea be to see you as town fir this. Let's lynch Pie and see how it goes from there.

In post 2697, Svenskt Stål wrote:I like this.

UNVOTE:

But we need to have a list by end of day, posted by someone that is town in almost everyones eyes, that pie has to follow.

Guess your heart wasn't really in it...

In post 2686, Svenskt Stål wrote:Wayne, lets form a work group

Idea be to see you as town fir this. Let's lynch Pie and see how it goes from there.

In post 2697, Svenskt Stål wrote:I like this.

UNVOTE:

But we need to have a list by end of day, posted by someone that is town in almost everyones eyes, that pie has to follow.

Guess your heart wasn't really in it...

In post 2739, NachoKoopa wrote:And when he ends up being SK, no one will bow down to me for noticing the obvious.

It's not fair to say that when you have more info than roughly 75% of the game. I hope you can sleep at night...
[quote="In post 2742,

waynegg · Post Post #2744 (ISO) » Mon Oct 28, 2013 12:22 pm

Let's try that again since my auto speller only kicks in to make me look like an incoherent fool...

In post 2686, Svenskt Stål wrote:Wayne, lets form a work group

I'd have to see you as town for this. Let's lynch Pie and see how it goes from there.

In post 2697, Svenskt Stål wrote:I like this.

UNVOTE:

But we need to have a list by end of day, posted by someone that is town in almost everyones eyes, that pie has to follow.

Guess your heart wasn't really in it...

In post 2739, NachoKoopa wrote:And when he ends up being SK, no one will bow down to me for noticing the obvious.

It's not fair to say that when you have more info than roughly 75% of the game. I hope you can sleep at night...

leviathan93 · Post Post #2745 (ISO) » Mon Oct 28, 2013 1:21 pm

In post 2696, PeregrineV wrote:And what's the defense of Levi again?

His neighbor comes in the thread calling him scum and he says nothing?

That is in no way a town reaction.

what? =P I did say something I'm pretty sure.

but oh my bad. because I didn't deny it, It's my claiming to be scum. =/ now THAT is some of the worst logic ever. =P

even if I HAD defended myself, which I did, people would have said the exact same thing, because who is ACTUALLY going to believe me?

Titus · Post Post #2746 (ISO) » Mon Oct 28, 2013 1:36 pm

Why are you saying Nacho has more info than the rest of us Waynegg?

Natirasha · Post Post #2747 (ISO) » Mon Oct 28, 2013 1:38 pm

In post 2746, Titus wrote:Why are you saying Nacho has more info than the rest of us Waynegg?

He's implying Nacho's scum, Titus.

Titus · Post Post #2748 (ISO) » Mon Oct 28, 2013 1:42 pm

Then I want to hear why he thinks Nacho is scum.

pieguyn · Post Post #2749 (ISO) » Mon Oct 28, 2013 2:58 pm

In post 2734, Titus wrote:Sorry Empking. You were.

@Pie, it should be clear my quote was a paraphrase of how I viewed your response rather than verbatim quote of 2659.

and I'm asking why the hell you think I would be fine with shooting from a single person if my intention really is to always hit town. it doesn't make any sense