Takes an outrageous stance to drive RVS forward and then doesn't back it up with anything but diffusion.
Actually votes waynegg for challenging his stance when his purported purpose is to attain reactions as a way to scumhunt, but then drops this attitude shortly after voting waynegg - doesn't follow up or take a stance on why waynegg's scummy.
In post 941, Belisarius wrote:Finally done, and since it took 5 1/2 hours not counting what I put in yesterday, I don't fucking want to hear anyone say I haven't done anything this game.
Good effort. Tell us more about how very very many hours you've spent scumhunting.
Every time you come out with reads I think 'Oh, that's what he's thinking and it hasn't changed from page 3'.
How the fuck do you still have a scumread on me? Wanna take some time out from your FFXIV to mount a case in the face of every single other player except Titus? Or do you only get motivated when your scumbuddies attack you?
Cause shit that'd actually require you to express an opinion on the game?
In post 972, Belisarius wrote:
Context; you look at intent, not just form. Statement Analysis is not just an excuse to be a grammar nazi. The sentence fragment in that post -- along with the pronoun omission -- forms a complete thought with the preceding sentence.
I totally didn't miss it entirely.
You can't make an objective read on intent, subjectively. By definition your purpose in applying McClish is to find intent, not prejudge it.
Great. No explanation, just expressing some kind of semi-credible, yet safe, "schum rheads"
Qualifies 'as town', where generally drunkposting is regarded as a towntell. No need to point alignment out unless attempting to grab for drunkposting cred.
In post 2864, Belisarius wrote:At this point all of the D2 discussion is "Yuh-uh"ing and "Nuh-uh"ing about lynching pie and abso-fucking-lutely nothing is happening that might catch scum instead.
This distraction from scumhunting needs to be eliminated.
VOTE: pie
Doesn't consider that pie may not be the problem, doesn't take a stance on the actual argument, which is whether it's better to trust pie or not, nor whether he believes multiball factors in.
Matias obvtowned the slot, not Wake, but doesn't explain how he got his read.
This is a kind of weird buddying and isn't the kind of thing you'd say to someone you're seriously considering a scum read based off 'petulance'.
In post 5013, Belisarius wrote: In post 5009, Wake1 wrote:Belisarius, what do you make of these votes on me? What reasons do you think they have, that pertain to me being Scum?
I think you're town. How the Christ would I have any insight into the thought processes of the people on your wagon?
No worries. Wake's town, but doesn't know why scum would be voting him.
In post 5095, Belisarius wrote: In post 5086, talah wrote:The risk is that we go into Day 4 with any and all of the people currently voting you ready to pick up where Wake left off anyway
Confirmed: This
will
happen.
I'm done being wishy-washy about it.
Was never wishy-washy about it, and agrees with my own massive-overkill expression of opinion.
In post 5254, Belisarius wrote: In post 5239, PeregrineV wrote:
With 8 days left, and saving Pie to shoot again, and not lynching Wake, who are your top 4 scum candidates?
Levi, talah, StefanB, and I dunno maybe Nati for ruining my questioning of Levi.
And continues to scumread me (and Levi) with virtually no reasoning. No challenge to his scumreads.
In post 5095, Belisarius wrote: In post 5245, AGar wrote:Outside of Glork, I don't know a single person on this entire site who can claim that they are consistently better than finding scum than an all-star baseball player is at hitting a ball. Even Glork might have a difficult time with that, I don't know, but he's probably consistently the most accurate on site off the top of my head.
You realise you're arguing that hitting scum
once
qualifies pie as the best scumhunter in the game? What is this madness
What's the argument exactly? That pie isn't to be trusted, or that vigilantes are better scumhunters than serial killers?
Anyway.
VOTE: Belisarius
I was tempted to leave 'Belies atriums' as the autocorrect.
Pyro - don't be sitting on an unvote, thanks.
