Mini 1521: The Fall - Game Over

Hopkirk · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2013 10:31 am

Who's there?

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2013 10:32 am

The chicken

vote: hopkirk

this would have worked better if it was all on 1 page lol

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2013 10:36 am

but to answer your question, I am not communist. If anything I see my self as more of a monarch and all should follow my lead. I think the best place to start would be sheeping me whenever possible.

Hopkirk · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2013 10:53 am

So are you voting me because i voted you or because i have poor humor?

If you don't work for the secret police why are you trying to lynch people hm? (In fact we may all be in the secret police).

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2013 10:59 am

I'm voting you cause you fell into my trap. Read my chicken joke again. Then read the knock knock joke.

The-Duck · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2013 11:09 am

In post 23, Hopkirk wrote:@The duck: He asked in post 16. Check 17 and you'll see the response that you missed.

@Jake: Why are you Stalinist?

Also why did the chicken cross the road? To get to the other side. (Btw this is a bad joke, not a scum claim as everyone in this thread already knows).

"The Hopkirk vote is not silly in as much as it is not humorous."
Explain why the vote is not silly or random.

I did read the answer, but I kind of assumed the question was what do you feel about him in this game, not what do you feel for players in his past, so you "dodged" the real question (Does the reasoning/vote tell you something about his alignment?)

Hopkirk · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2013 11:13 am

The central point of your argument:
Whoever the chicken is going to visit is scum.
I am scum because the chicken is visiting me.

This is a fallacy as you are basing your conclusions with an argument that can only be there because of your conclusions. It's the same as saying "you are scum because you're scum". It's poor circular logic at best.

@Duck: The central point of my response: Nobody smart would seriously consider that as a good basis for a vote (by basic mafia theory) so anyone who was considering that to be a good basis for the vote must be very bad.
I'm waiting for him to follow up before any read.

The-Duck · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2013 11:28 am

Okay, that sounds reasonable.
How about my vote on Alduskkel, do you think that is a stupid/bad reason as well? (Others should feel free to answer that as well)

Yiley · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2013 11:43 am

I think it is a very weak reason

Slandaar · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2013 11:53 am

Wait, slow down, lets look at this sensibly...

The chicken who we know was on his way to visit one of the mafias' house's finds Hopkirk at the door. Hopkirk then tries to discredit the chicken suggesting it's a fallacy and poor circular logic! This means it is indeed his house and he wasn't just visiting or house sitting etc otherwise he would have already explained that in his thorough analysis. This means Hopkirk is the owner of the house and we know the chicken was visiting a house owned by a member of the mafia so there is only one conclusion we can draw here.

VOTE: Hopkirk

Yiley · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2013 12:12 pm

Actually Hopkirk is renting it from you
VOTE: slandaar

Alduskkel · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2013 12:45 pm

What is this stuff about chickens and houses I don't even.

In post 21, The-Duck wrote:So, you put in some effort too make your random vote and decided against making that because someone continued on a joke but randomly voted somebody else?
Do you see scum motivation in his actions?

There's no particular scum motivation, rather it just seems like a bit of cognitive dissonance. Like how scumslips have no scum motivation.

Anyway,

Vote: Yiley

Has posted a lot but hasn't said much. Yes, it is page 2, but contrast what The-Duck and Hopkirk are posting to what Yiley is posting.

JKLM · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2013 12:45 pm

VOTE: the duck

I hate ducks.

Alduskkel · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2013 12:48 pm

JKLM, give me your read on Hopkirk.

Yiley · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2013 6:38 pm

Ald look at my other two games that is my play style

BolteAltamont · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2013 6:48 pm

VOTE: emogirl123 for being the first to confirm yet not ever posting again.

In post 33, Yiley wrote:I think it is a very weak reason

Compared to any other reasoning one could muster up for voting someone seriously at this point, the reasoning is one of the stronger ones.

emogirl123 · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:14 pm

Because I'm approaching this game differently. You kids can circlejerk all you want during RVS. Call me when you post real content.

emogirl123 · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:28 pm

Let's get down to some business.

The-Duck (19): Explain to me your thought process when you made this post. It is not in-line with the rest of the thread.

BolteAltamont (40): Same with you Bolte. See above.

No one else was interesting.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:32 pm

The Fall: Votecount #1

Hopkirk: 2 - JFSF, Slandaar
JFSF: 1 - Hopkirk
JKLM: 1 - iamausername
Alduskkel: 1 - The-Duck
Slandaar: 1 - Yiley
Yiley : 1 - Alduskkel
The-Duck: 1 - JKLM
emogirl123: 1 - BolteAltamont

Not Voting: SonOfZeus, PeregrineV, greygnarl, emogirl123

With

13

alive it's

7

to lynch.

This day will end in (expired on 2013-12-09 12:00:00)

SonOfZeus · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2013 8:10 pm

Hello. VOTE: Theduck

Hopkirk · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2013 9:09 pm

@The duck: What do you think about your own reasoning?

Slandaar is obviously just going to slandar (slander) me.

@Emo: What’s wrong with starting the game off, how would you like to do it? It seems what you’re saying is you’ll wait for someone to say something scummy then jump on them for it.

VOTE: Emogirl123

emogirl123 · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2013 9:17 pm

It's less distracting than what you were doing.

emogirl123 · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2013 9:21 pm

I am only interested in the response from The-Duck and BolteAltamont. Everyone else can carry on with what they were doing.

Slandaar · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2013 10:06 pm

In post 35, Yiley wrote:Actually Hopkirk is renting it from you
VOTE: slandaar

No that is covered by the etc here:

In post 34, Slandaar wrote:This means it is indeed his house and he wasn't just visiting or house sitting etc

I forgive you Yiley, I forgive you.

In post 46, emogirl123 wrote:It's less distracting than what you were doing.

Which is?

The-Duck · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2013 10:14 pm

In post 42, emogirl123 wrote:Let's get down to some business.
The-Duck (19): Explain to me your thought process when you made this post. It is not in-line with the rest of the thread.

BolteAltamont (40): Same with you Bolte. See above.

No one else was interesting.

I don't like wasting time on RVS and I think my reason to vote Ald was as good as it's going to get in RVS, so I made that post.
Its weird that you say you don't like RVS, but question the motives of the first one to try and break it?

Hopkirk, I do believe that it's a decent reason for a non-random vote this early.
I liked how he answered my questions and I think of him as town at the moment. However, Jake just came in the thread to make a comment on a joke instead of the other things that were going on. To me this feels like an attempt to prolong RVS, in which scum can easily hide and waste time without any risk of screwing up.
UNVOTE: Alduskkel
VOTE: Jake from State Farm