So you're saying I can't respond to it?In post 73, pieguyn wrote:exactly why I think you're being defensive. his vote was a RV just like any other, so why do you feel the need to say it's not true? it's not a serious accusation. 0.0
Right now, probably town.In post 73, pieguyn wrote:are you initially leaning town or scum on Kaze?
Nothing jumps out at me. Maybe Cabd.In post 74, Kazekirimaru wrote:Start off by telling me who you're looking at for scum thus far.
It's obvious, though.In post 71, Kazekirimaru wrote:Well stop being opaque.
Kay.In post 76, Brian Skies wrote:Nothing jumps out at me. Maybe Cabd.In post 74, Kazekirimaru wrote:Start off by telling me who you're looking at for scum thus far.
Try again later.
Humor me?In post 77, geists wrote:It's obvious, though.In post 71, Kazekirimaru wrote:Well stop being opaque.
I thought you didn't like his reaction. how come you wanna work with him all of a sudden?In post 74, Kazekirimaru wrote:Me too! Let's be bitchin this game together, eh?
Start off by telling me who you're looking at for scum thus far
no, I'm saying it's not natural to have such a motivation to respond to it like that. it wasn't a serious vote, which makes me think since you defended against it you seem scared.In post 75, Brian Skies wrote:So you're saying I can't respond to it?
do you attribute this mostly to him being his usual self here?In post 75, Brian Skies wrote:Right now, probably town.
Nah, his reaction is fine. I was just poking at him. I got nothin'.In post 79, pieguyn wrote:I thought you didn't like his reaction. how come you wanna work with him all of a sudden?In post 74, Kazekirimaru wrote:Me too! Let's be bitchin this game together, eh?
Start off by telling me who you're looking at for scum thus far
Because I felt like it? Somebody asked for the reason people were voting KA. I provided what i perceived as the reason, while noting I didn't agree it was worthy of a vote.In post 62, Brian Skies wrote:Hai. Why does this post contradict what you just said previously?In post 35, Cabd wrote:Note my lack of vote on the KA wagon.
so you disagree that it seems defensive?In post 81, Kazekirimaru wrote:Nah, his reaction is fine. I was just poking at him. I got nothin'.
I've only played two games with Kaze, and he was town both times. In both of those games, he jumped on early wagons.In post 80, pieguyn wrote:do you attribute this mostly to him being his usual self here?
also, what's your opinion on KA?
Having issues reading a single scumgame of mine where I was in a hydra makes me universally unreadable, now?In post 85, KingdomAces wrote:Cabd, I skimmed Xenologue while it was happening, and I got absolutely nothing off of you there.
I don't recall opining about the wagon one way or another.In post 64, Kazekirimaru wrote:Guize fferynati and Cabd aren't on the wagon so we're obviously badposting mmk?
How about either of you pony up a reason why this wagon is bad? I'm not a big fan of the whole "look at the children play, aren't they cute?" vibe I'm getting from the two(three) of you.
Well, the good news is you get a week to figure her out before I come back and make a smokescreen again.In post 87, Cabd wrote:So I just got done with a series of fun skypegames and pegged the fuck out of fferyscum (and called her partner day one wheee) so I feel like if she's scum I can peg her again. We'll see what time holds for us.
When does these ever work? Like seriously, rvs IMO normally gets town lynchedIn post 93, KingdomAces wrote:No, but it does make me less inclined to target you when attempting provoke enough of a reaction to get a solid read within the first few hours of the game.
My post wasn't useless, btw.In post 42, KingdomAces wrote:The question is, if you are going to post, why do the single most useless thing you can possibly do? Yes it's RVS and there hasn't been anything that you can react to so far, why not try to start something instead of continue the trend of uselessness?
This lacks the verve you usually bring to the game.In post 48, pieguyn wrote:@Cabd, TNE: what are your thoughts on Sakura so far?
What is this new strategy and why did you change?In post 60, pieguyn wrote:I blame this new RVS strategy. I'm not too sure on how to do it right so that probably explains why some things seem forced @_@In post 51, geists wrote:indeed.
nm found it.In post 67, pieguyn wrote:the fact that it was a RV. it's natural people are going to RV with weird reasons, so IMO it's defensive because you seem to be really taking it seriously. 0.0In post 65, Brian Skies wrote:What about that vote is defensive?
not sure what you mean by reasoning, if that doesn't explain it can you elaborate plz?
what's your opinion on Kaze?
wagon hopping. note how I hopped on Mac's wagon and then sheeped Marquis on his KA vote. it's objective is just like any other RVS strategy, to make shit happen to advance the game and make information pop up. I chose this strategy cause I wanna try out smth new for onceIn post 64, Kazekirimaru wrote:What strategy, and what was it's objective exactly?
the fact that you're interested in this means you agree my posts seem forced, right?
what's your thoughts on TNE so far?
