was talking about theis part:In post 1160, XScorpion wrote:And for a second, I was almost convinced shos actually reads the topic, until I got to here.
In post 1157, shos wrote:that is 150% correct imo.In post 1136, XScorpion wrote: p-edit:The fuck are you talking about? Literally shos is the only person I've accused of that, and only after Obscurity replaced out. I WAS TALKING ABOUT VOTING OBSCURITY MYSELF JUST A FEW PAGES AGO!In post 1135, helium-3 wrote:lol, this coming from someone heaping the "scumpoints" onIn post 1132, XScorpion wrote:Also Majiffy I would really like it a lot if you gave as much content as you could before the lynch because no one has any idea about the alignment of that slot and if they say they do they are wrong.anyone who even gives the obscurity slot a funny look
You know, scorp, I've been holding my tongue, but I'm getting fed up with you scumreading us regardless of what we do, turning mollie's playstyle into a scumtell, andchainsawing everyone attacking the obscurity slot
. mescuzzy for misleading.You know, scorp, I've been holding my tongue, but I'm getting fed up with you scumreading us regardless of what we do
I built a case for lynching obs? WHERE?In post 1161, XScorpion wrote:The difference between "taking attention to" and building a case for lynching a goldfish is a fine line considering the replacement wasn't even there yet. And how is anyone supposed to know who obscurity is?In post 1157, shos wrote:where have I exactly tried to get Obs lynched? I am the one who initiated his replacement, and I didn't do it just because. that wagon had some tide - I could just as easily hop on it and probably ride through a lynch. I chose not to, and attempt a force replacement. Then, I took attention to that post. THAT IS IT. If you took your time to actually READ THE POST, you'll see that its intention was to see if anyone knows who Obs is, any meta etc. the only one who answered it is Stahr so far. I'll just assume that the others say no as well.
Do you think the slot is scum?
here, this was my post:
now, let's see what I did there.In post 1067, shos wrote:I want to take a look at this post more closely.In post 1057, Obscurity wrote:What the holy fuck.
Apparently, active lurking as a tactic has been voted out byvox populi.
If that's truly what MS has come down to, fuck you all very much.
@Mod: replace me, then.
I strongly disagree with the notion of a moderator bending to the will of the players as far as force-replacing. But who am I, anyway.
see, he was surprised that the mod replaced him,admittingthat he was active lurking as a tactic. Is there any reason for town to be active lurking?(so much for active, btw lol).
btw, who is he, really? he is a 2011 player with no games and no posts. someone's alt? perhaps we can find scum-meta of lurking?
1. look more closely.
2. bring it up that obs admitted to have active lurked as tactic.
3. ask if there's a reason for town to do that(which I also did in my last longpost, after stahr said that there are such reasons)
4. ask if anyone knows whose alt he is so that I can research meta and gain info.
^^^is a case???
open game man, just goon, lolIn post 1166, Grimgroove wrote:1. Alignment: Scum
2. Role: No clue. But you probably just put that inthere to imply you have a special role, which is at odds with your self-vote earlier, leading me back to point 1.