Mini 1520: Neighborhood Mafia - Game over!

[notscience]

I WAS AT THE BEACH

as I look out my window and see snow, I hate you right now

IAWTP

Esp, you didn't answer my question

[Espeonage]

Hmmm? I'm either blind or it's from before when I checked.

[notscience]

Are you voting him for his posting style or because you think he's scum?

This, it was intended for you

[Espeonage]

In relation to Bald? I think he's scum because of his posting style. So both?

[DrippingGoofball]

Jake is scum.

[Jake from State Farm]

Jake is scum.

Nope but nice try

[PrivateI]

And Bald is continuing his same posting style,

What exactly are you referring to with this? I ask not because I disagree, but because I am genuinely curious.

DGB, is there any reason in particular that you believe that Jake is scum?

Jake, in reference to your problem with list reads, do you legitimately believe they are scummy, or is it something akin to the notscience vote where you are willing to lynch based on a specific policy you hold?

[Jake from State Farm]

I legitimately believe they are scummy but unless I'm in a really bad mood I won't lynch solely cause if that. Doolittle is scum cause his play tells me he's scum. Lurking/no scum hunting/trolling

[DrippingGoofball]

DGB, is there any reason in particular that you believe that Jake is scum?

I get the notscience policy lynch intentions, but it is an artificial reason in the sense that policy lynches aren't game-behavior sensitive, they are based on meta and meta alone.

But then coming up with another completely fabricated reason like "read lists are scummy" makes a second artificial reason to vote a player, in the same game day.

Both instances are example of "scumhunting" that lacks nuance, and are based in rigid dogma.

That's not town Jake.

[Jake from State Farm]

You obviously don't know me like you think you do. I hate list reads with a passion.

Spoiler:

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p5250718
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p4651688
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 0#p4652270
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 6#p4752886
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 7#p5379367

also if I am not playing like you think I normally play, that could be due to the fact that I said in the signup thread I was going to introduce a new playstyle.

[DrippingGoofball]

*SIGH*

[Jake from State Farm]

person who is doing no scum hunting herself is really criticizing my play?

*SIGH*

[Jake from State Farm]

So can we lynch Doolittle now?

[Jake from State Farm]

Or how about this. How about you explain why sanora/ espionage is scum. You have camped on that slot all game and have provided no reasoning. It's easy to attack others for their reasonings when you haven't provided one yourself.

And if you are attacking me for my push on Doolittle, does that mean you don't think Doolittle is scum anymore? Remember you called him scum yourself after I voted him. If your read changed explain why

[DrDolittle]

You obviously don't know me like you think you do. I hate list reads with a passion.

Spoiler:

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p5250718
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p4651688
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 0#p4652270
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 6#p4752886
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 7#p5379367

also if I am not playing like you think I normally play, that could be due to the fact that I said in the signup thread I was going to introduce a new playstyle.

hey guess what i went through your links

turns out all the guys that gave list reads were town

waddup with that

[DrDolittle]

can we get prods on

FuDuzn Nov 30, 03:10am Dec 06, 10:30pm 2 days 21 hours 13
Mac Nov 27, 08:48am Dec 06, 06:05pm 3 days 2 hours 24
MafiaSSK Nov 26, 11:58pm Dec 06, 01:30pm 3 days 6 hours 13

these folks

[Espeonage]

And Bald is continuing his same posting style,

What exactly are you referring to with this? I ask not because I disagree, but because I am genuinely curious.

I mentioned the posting for the sake of posting. His recent post continues this. Makes a little push on his preferred wagon to keep it in people's minds but it does it lightly so he has very little commitment to answering for his suspicion. I just don't like the way he is hanging around and not really coming in to the forefront, but still maintains pressure. I said before that he is acting like he wants to be heard but not seen. So he wants his opinion floating around, but doesn't want to really come into the discussion about wagons.

[Jake from State Farm]

hey guess what i went through your links

turns out all the guys that gave list reads were town

waddup with that

that is why I am not using that to lynch you, but it doesn't change the fact that I will always think list reads are scummy because they are.

i'm voting to lynch you because of

Lurking/no scum hunting/trolling

[Espeonage]

Which is double standards. You raised the reads list in response to being asked why you are going for DrD over other lurkers.

Have a rethink. Come back. Post some wagons you're happy to jump on. If Dolittle is still around there, so be it.

[Jake from State Farm]

nah I am happy with my vote where it's at

[FuDuzn]

Sorry hadn't realized so much time had passed, will try to get to this later tonight.

[Alduskkel]

great work mr. confirmed town

[notscience]

^Welcome to the townbloc

[ThAdmiral]

Vote Count

notscience
MafiaSSK - 3 (DrDoolittle, PrivateI)
DrippingGoofball
Alduskkel - 1 (MafiaSSK)
1baldeagle1 - 1 (Espeonage)
goodnight
DrDolittle - 2 (Jake from State Farm, Alduskkel)
Landmind - 1 (goodnight)
Espeonage - 1 (DrippingGoofball, Landmind)
PrivateI - 1 (1baldeagle1)
Mac
Jake from State Farm

Not Voting: notscience, Mac

[Alduskkel]

I don't think that vote count is correct. Isn't baldeagle voting MafiaSSK?