In post 49, Katarina LeBlanc wrote:That was the appropriate response, didn't really want to get into that state where you're feigning scumhunting from something as unnecessary as this. L pls.
Why feigning? There is a reason people wagon in RVS and that's to get reactions and get the game started. It looks like that's what you wanted to avoid.
I mean, I can understand wanting to draw out the other scum and wanting to solidify more reads today and such, but considering we have two investigative PRs in a 9p set up that can also get drawn out if they talk long enough, pulling the trigger as soon as possible is the optimal play here in my opinion.
---
If anyone else wants to claim intent, hammer, or whatever - go for it. Keep an eye on Wisdom day 2 for me if I don't come back with the snacks.
In post 49, Katarina LeBlanc wrote:That was the appropriate response, didn't really want to get into that state where you're feigning scumhunting from something as unnecessary as this. L pls.
Why feigning? There is a reason people wagon in RVS and that's to get reactions and get the game started. It looks like that's what you wanted to avoid.
As you said, the it's RVS. The votes have no meaning nor does any reaction you try to get. The reactions you get from there are standardized to make it look like someone is scumhunting and trying to make something out of votes that don't carry at all in that game (specifically that wagon and not this L-1).
Why should I try to intervene and get into something not worth investing on. Avoiding it doesn't mean I object to the wagon, I'd say so myself. I just simply don't care.
In post 63, Kazekirimaru wrote:I wouldn't mind a claim first, I just kinda doubt it'll change the outcome. I very much doubt they're anything but scum.
In post 49, Katarina LeBlanc wrote:That was the appropriate response, didn't really want to get into that state where you're feigning scumhunting from something as unnecessary as this. L pls.
Why feigning? There is a reason people wagon in RVS and that's to get reactions and get the game started. It looks like that's what you wanted to avoid.
As you said, the it's RVS. The votes have no meaning nor does any reaction you try to get. The reactions you get from there are standardized to make it look like someone is scumhunting and trying to make something out of votes that don't carry at all in that game (specifically that wagon and not this L-1).
Why should I try to intervene and get into something not worth investing on. Avoiding it doesn't mean I object to the wagon, I'd say so myself. I just simply don't care.
In post 63, Kazekirimaru wrote:I wouldn't mind a claim first, I just kinda doubt it'll change the outcome. I very much doubt they're anything but scum.
This is pretty bad, js!
You don't have to make it so obvious you're the other scum, miss. We already know.
Translation: Ugh oh. My wagon is going too fast. Help!
In post 30, PhDScar wrote:VOTE: Wisdom After playing one game with him as scum I no his meta backwards and forewords. This is scum Wisdom.
Translation: Hi, I am a tasty scumbait! I look stupid and don't know how to spell properly.
In post 31, Deltabacon wrote:What a nice, general statement you have there. Care to elaborate further? It's just that 1) I hate meta as a scumhunting tactic and 2) I fail to see how one game entitles you to make such an outlandish claim.
I may need some convincing. Until then;
UNVOTE: JasonWazza, VOTE: PhDscar
Translation: An excuse to change vote at last!
In post 32, PhDScar wrote:@Deltabacon as scum he posts. What is doing now? Posting.
Someone with a cuter avatar than mine? Unacceptable.
Trying to avoid scumhunting using avatars, voting Kagami for trivial reasons instead. Not accusing Wisdom and PhDScar for being Blood Mages for having intelligent looking avatars; intelligence = mages is very very suspicious...
However, I find skipping JasonWazza bandwagon to avoid stupid early L-1 normal, in fact voting anyone including herself is normal.
In post 29, Wisdom wrote:No, it's actually on you. You merely dodged the question with "lolrvs".
That was the appropriate response, didn't really want to get into that state where you're feigning scumhunting from something as unnecessary as this. L pls.
Also, did I miss from this Bacon wagon?
I don't like the phrase: "That was the appropriate response". Don't know what she meant.
In post 49, Katarina LeBlanc wrote:That was the appropriate response, didn't really want to get into that state where you're feigning scumhunting from something as unnecessary as this. L pls.
Why feigning? There is a reason people wagon in RVS and that's to get reactions and get the game started. It looks like that's what you wanted to avoid.
As you said, the it's RVS. The votes have no meaning nor does any reaction you try to get. The reactions you get from there are standardized to make it look like someone is scumhunting and trying to make something out of votes that don't carry at all in that game (specifically that wagon and not this L-1).
Why should I try to intervene and get into something not worth investing on. Avoiding it doesn't mean I object to the wagon, I'd say so myself. I just simply don't care.
In post 63, Kazekirimaru wrote:I wouldn't mind a claim first, I just kinda doubt it'll change the outcome. I very much doubt they're anything but scum.
In post 69, YellowKingValley wrote:However, I find skipping JasonWazza bandwagon to avoid stupid early L-1 normal, in fact voting anyone including herself is normal.
But there was not even a comment on it. She just completely ignored it.
But at least she did acknowledge that the wagon exist by saying: "Also, did I miss from this Bacon wagon?". Lesser scums will just go "see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil". I interpret her lack of additional comments as "not too convinced of the wagon to demand claim". Why did you not ask for her opinion on Deltabacon then?
In contrast to you... you are convinced that Deltabacon is scum but yet avoid asking for claim? If you are worried that he might be PR, why don't you devise a method so that he will survive the night even if he claims?
