Mini 1520: Neighborhood Mafia - Game over!

notscience · Post Post #600 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2013 12:34 pm

In post 598, morph the cat wrote:
In post 593, notscience wrote:
In post 591, morph the cat wrote:
In post 565, Alduskkel wrote:Right, I've been sick for the past two days but with any luck I'll be doing better. Also the site being down didn't help either.

Looking forward to scumreads from morph.

Current plan is to iso DGB.

Jake, give me your opinion on post 525.
How's the iso going?
I'm still waiting, btw
Hope you've got a comfy chair then fool; we're on our own schedule and when you're dead and gone, we'll still be here.

I'm sitting on a bed, comfy enough.

morph the cat · Post Post #601 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2013 12:35 pm

NO but seriously I forgot what you were waiting for, out with it.

notscience · Post Post #602 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2013 12:43 pm

A certain read containing the word obvtown in it

Mac · Post Post #603 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2013 12:44 pm

In post 599, Stuffed Crust wrote:forgot about this game. will get to it tomorrow

notscience · Post Post #604 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2013 12:45 pm

Oh and I still want to know who to vote

morph the cat · Post Post #605 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2013 12:46 pm

In post 602, notscience wrote:A certain read containing the word obvtown in it

We're not giving out reads. Read the setup.

morph the cat · Post Post #606 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2013 12:46 pm

notscience wrote:Oh and I still want to know who to vote

In post 597, morph the cat wrote:
In post 589, MafiaSSK wrote:
In post 587, PrivateI wrote:
In post 252, MafiaSSK wrote:Scum is in notscience and Mac. Both for insubstantial posting.
Kind of hypocritical, but

Mod, request prod on SSK.
On a semi-related note, I will be V/LA between December 25th and 28th for a conference.

I'm still seeing lurkerscum in SSK, but I don't think anyone else sees it that way.

I don't understand DGB's play at all...if he doesn't want to play, why not replace?

At this point, what do we do? A lynch is needed at some point, and SSK seems the most likely scum candidate. Just read his ISO. This evening, I will be posting some more direct accusations, but for now, my vote is staying where it is.
Dude. You've never played with me. I lurk. It's my thing.
This thing ignored my reach out post. We can PL it today.

notscience · Post Post #607 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2013 12:48 pm

VOTE: ssk

k

HOW DOES IT FEEL DESTROYING MY EGO

morph the cat · Post Post #608 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2013 12:49 pm

In post 607, notscience wrote:VOTE: ssk

k

HOW DOES IT FEEL DESTROYING MY EGO

Orgasmic.

morph the cat · Post Post #609 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:05 pm

In post 608, morph the cat wrote:
In post 607, notscience wrote:VOTE: ssk

k

HOW DOES IT FEEL DESTROYING MY EGO
Orgasmic.

Well jeez; not that I disagree but we really shouldn't talk about our kinky morph turnons like that.

notscience · Post Post #610 (ISO) » Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:42 pm

I'm laughing so hard at that last post

goodnight · Post Post #611 (ISO) » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:16 am

In post 522, DrippingGoofball wrote:
In post 505, Espeonage wrote:DGB is better. Because of three reasons of increasing importance.

1. DGB is reading badly. Which is weird. (Fallacy but still)
2. She has rather good interactions with hard to read people such and landmine. Which means her lynch has lots of info.
3. Sheis always a good lynch because she's dgb.
Oh really. An info lynch of a player that gets routinely NK'd on night 1. Bravo.

That AtE...

In post 556, DrippingGoofball wrote:
In post 552, 1baldeagle1 wrote:DGB, what's your read on SSK? If it's scum, please move your vote there. I want an SSK lynch today.
Meh. I don't think he's more likely to be scum than anyone else's odds.

In post 582, Landmind wrote: Let's see. Nobody on DGB's wagon has been able to sell it and it's patently ridiculous. This is textbook DGB townplay. On the plus side I don't really see her being lynched today without shenanigans. I guess aside from DGB nobody on that wagon gives me great feelings.

Actually, this is not textbook DGB town play at all. DGB is aggressive as town and tries to push through her scumreads, often bumping heads with several players. DGB in this game is reserved, almost disconnected from what is going on. I'm seeing a lot of indecisiveness in regards to her reads, and she isn't pushing for her scum reads as hard as I'd expect. In fact, she almost seems to be leaving her options open.

In post 582, Landmind wrote: Esp really wants to be liked and seems to spend a lot of his time being quietly desperate.

I'm not seeing this at all. Why are all your reads backward and fake?

-Night

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #612 (ISO) » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:47 am

In post 611, goodnight wrote:That AtE...

Thank you for the 3-lettered, illuminating, lazy-ass wikitell.

morph the cat · Post Post #613 (ISO) » Tue Dec 24, 2013 9:27 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:
In post 611, goodnight wrote:That AtE...
Thank you for the 3-lettered, illuminating, lazy-ass wikitell.

I note with great interest that you dismissed a contentful post on the basis of 2 words and don't address the substantive and somewhat damning observation that came later:

In post 611, goodnight wrote:Actually, this is not textbook DGB town play at all. DGB is aggressive as town and tries to push through her scumreads, often bumping heads with several players. DGB in this game is reserved, almost disconnected from what is going on. I'm seeing a lot of indecisiveness in regards to her reads, and she isn't pushing for her scum reads as hard as I'd expect. In fact, she almost seems to be leaving her options open.

goodnight · Post Post #614 (ISO) » Tue Dec 24, 2013 11:47 am

In post 612, DrippingGoofball wrote:
In post 611, goodnight wrote:That AtE...
Thank you for the 3-lettered, illuminating, lazy-ass wikitell.

If a simple phrase or emoticon can get across what I think better than a sentence or paragraph, then of course I will use it. After all, saying "That AtE..." is simpler than saying "Look at DGB trying to guilt the town into not lynching her...". By the way, the strawman is noted.

-Night

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #615 (ISO) » Tue Dec 24, 2013 12:07 pm

In post 613, morph the cat wrote:the substantive and somewhat damning observation that came later:

It' just krap meta, meta is krap.

Just go ahead and lynch me, scumbags, see if I care.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #616 (ISO) » Tue Dec 24, 2013 12:08 pm

Come on, three more votes, I'm outta here and you can flush your shit meta arguments down the toilet.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #617 (ISO) » Tue Dec 24, 2013 12:09 pm

In post 614, goodnight wrote:
In post 612, DrippingGoofball wrote:
In post 611, goodnight wrote:That AtE...
Thank you for the 3-lettered, illuminating, lazy-ass wikitell.
If a simple phrase or emoticon can get across what I think better than a sentence or paragraph, then of course I will use it. After all, saying "That AtE..." is simpler than saying "Look at DGB trying to guilt the town into not lynching her...". By the way, the strawman is noted.

-Night

THIS is scum.

Calling meta shit "substantive." Yeah like diarrhea can be substantive.

goodnight · Post Post #618 (ISO) » Tue Dec 24, 2013 1:19 pm

Are you calling the conf. town scum?

-Night

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #619 (ISO) » Tue Dec 24, 2013 4:14 pm

Please lynch me.

morph the cat · Post Post #620 (ISO) » Tue Dec 24, 2013 5:36 pm

In post 619, DrippingGoofball wrote:Please lynch me.

You are starting to make me really paranoid that you're the Mafia godfather.

Espeonage · Post Post #621 (ISO) » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:50 pm

So we lynch her. If she sticks around (she said she won't replace) it will be a drain on the town. Simple as hell lynch.

Alduskkel · Post Post #622 (ISO) » Wed Dec 25, 2013 12:21 am

Well, I iso'd DGB. It's not worth much, but the wagon on her seems unjustified.

In post 569, Espeonage wrote:1. You pointed out quite explicitly that if SSK is scum, Ald is where we should go. I challenged that view. Oh look who opened this discussion you're refusing to acknowledge.

Espeonage, you indicate that you "challenged" DGB on this. Where did you do this?

---

Vote: MafiaSSK

. Larger wagon, still scummy. Recent posts are just appealing to his meta.

Espeonage · Post Post #623 (ISO) » Wed Dec 25, 2013 12:36 am

In post 622, Alduskkel wrote:Well, I iso'd DGB. It's not worth much, but the wagon on her seems unjustified.

In post 569, Espeonage wrote:1. You pointed out quite explicitly that if SSK is scum, Ald is where we should go. I challenged that view. Oh look who opened this discussion you're refusing to acknowledge.
Espeonage, you indicate that you "challenged" DGB on this. Where did you do this?

One of the questions I asked that I quoted twice was prefaced with my belief that PI makes more sense as an SSK partner from their interactions earlier in the day, which I picked up on during me read on replacement.

Alduskkel · Post Post #624 (ISO) » Wed Dec 25, 2013 12:42 am

Why should I vote DGB rather than dolittle or SSK?