I don't think you are.In post 399, Wake1 wrote:You may as well vote already, Peabody. I'm not lying.
Could have done without the victory dance, though, imo.In post 408, Peabody wrote:<3 Love the GIFs
You were Scum, I think.In post 393, Yates wrote:In post 388, goodmorning wrote:I remember I read that newb as townier than you.In post 156, Yates wrote:If you're Town you don't need [or even WANT] a universal town read. If you become a universal town read as town you become a night target.
So I was... That's the one where I replaced hapahauli then replaced out myself. How do you guys remember these games??? I'm having enough time keeping track of the three games I have running on this site plus the other 2 off site!In post 413, goodmorning wrote:You were Scum, I think.
It does not matter. You still did not need to claim.In post 365, Wake1 wrote:Being the Tracker, I already knew Yates was lying, and was more than thrilled to go about asking these questions for my own entertainment.
I would have taken his death over yours, given that you are the actual Tracker. If he had died and you had not claimed, we would have been better off.The reason I role-claimed is because I've caught Scum, and I knew sooner or later Yates was going to get dead if he didn't come off it.
Yeah, but that is what happened. Wake's counter was dumb, but it was still a huge risk to take.In post 368, Yates wrote:Look - obviously it wasn't my intent to out Wake. It's not like I could just *assume* there was a tracker in this game. That was just bad luck.
Or, he remains hidden and crumbs, giving us more usable info without letting the scum know he even exists.Finally, I think you are overly concerned about having an outed trackerwith a guilty result. The reason for him to counter at this point is for precisely the reason you wanted him to stay hidden - protection. Assuming there's only 1 other scum, they are now playing a game of Russian Roulette. "Can I kill Wake before he tracks me?"
My complaint was perfectly reasonable. Just because I think someone is town does not mean that I think that person is flawless.In post 396, Peabody wrote:Aegor is probably DBK's partner because:..Aegor believes Wake, but for some reason feels the need to argue with him? I see this as an OMGUS for finding his scum partner.
He was dead already. His new claim is even more absurd (A for his effort, though). It was still possible that DBK was a PR that targeted 2 mastinas but did not want to claim. I was simply acknowledging all possibilities.2) This looks like partner coaching partner.
I like to keep up with meta a bit.In post 415, Yates wrote:So I was... That's the one where I replaced hapahauli then replaced out myself. How do you guys remember these games??? I'm having enough time keeping track of the three games I have running on this site plus the other 2 off site!In post 413, goodmorning wrote:You were Scum, I think.
Oh, and I'm putting my 2nd game together if you look at my sig. Should be fun if anyone's interested in pre-ining for it. /advertisement.
???In post 418, Wake1 wrote:I have a gut Scumread on Peabody.
) and everybody is mortified to find