Micro 279: Uncommon Mafia - OVER

[Bicephalous Bob]

His implosion vote was also bad.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Klick

[Klick]

Then why did you not call out the implosion vote until just now?

[Bert]

Unvote

Deadline is just short of when I have full time access. Farkle. *rolls dice*

Will look at this before lunch.

Aegor seems to want to frame it as either me or Bert and

Bert seems like he's going to claim something reasonably powerful and then try and coast on that.

You're smearing the meaning of my words. I'm not trying to coast. I have been inactive, and I said I would step it up in a week once holidays end. But, you interpreted it and smeared it as such, which concerns me. It's in my best interest to survive today.

That has nothing to do with "coasting," so where that word came from, I don't know. I already said I haven't put much effort into this game, and it's not coasting - it's the circumstances of holiday season.

Bert

[PhDScar]

VOTE: Klick
I agree with Bob.

[Bert]

His implosion vote was also bad.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Klick

the last vote by Klick looks convenient/lazy, but how does that equal bad??

[Klick]

VOTE: Klick
I agree with Bob.

Okay, what the fuck is this.

Bob didn't even give much of a reason for his vote, as opposed to DLA giving reason to suspect me.

(Phone-bound, my internet connection was mysteriously missing when I woke up this morning)

[Aegor]

I don't really like Aegor or Bert's most recent posts. Aegor seems to want to frame it as either me or Bert...

Realistically, it is either you or Bert, or some other person with a case built on him/her. It was just a pragmatic statement. I hate bandwagons that start late since they tend to produce weaker reads and reveal less info about voting patterns than early and slow wagons.

[Bert]

hey Aegor, got anything else to say? Other than responding directly to Alduskkel's post.

[Aegor]

As a matter of fact, I do. Here are my reads so far:

Implosion:

His defensiveness is off-putting and borderline suspicious, but his posts after he disengaged from DLA have been good. Null-town.

DLA:

Focus on implosion was annoying. Subsequent posts have been null until his latest on Klick, which I like. I want to hear DLA's thoughts on people other than implosion and Klick.

Klick:

Scummy. Post 54 and 56 appeal to his "gut," which is always a weak reason. Lurk, lurk, lurk, then a scummy vote on implosion in post 165 was unjustified and his vote on Ald was even worse. Especially because he claimed a Bob/Ald pairing without reconciling that with Bob's push for Ald's lynch.

AoS: Klick

.

Bob:

Little info except for reads in post 179. Want to hear more from him, especially about why Ald is apparently so scummy. Null.

PhD:

I like the few substantial posts that he has made. Town-ish.

yessiree:

Scummy lurking. Still waiting to hear about the one scum he has found.

[Aegor]

I don't recall Bob doing anything related to this, first of all -- although I could be wrong.

This is ancient, but I never responded. Bob accused Wake of something similar.

Secondly, there's a difference between "polite" and "ingratiating." Also buddying is totally a scumtell, especially when one seems to be doing it to everyone.

I think we have different thresholds for what constitutes buddying.

[Bert]

Still waiting to hear about the one scum he has found.

Why do you refer to the one scum he has found as "one scum," when it is clear he meant me as his sole scumread?

[Aegor]

Still waiting to hear about the one scum he has found.

Why do you refer to the one scum he has found as "one scum," when it is clear he meant me as his sole scumread?

Because he voted you in post 28 and has not justified or explained his vote in any way. Even if he meant you, I want an explanation of the statement. He has not even confirmed that it is you.

[Klick]

I just need one post to catch scum, and I've already found one this game

Who?

u

[Aegor]

I just need one post to catch scum, and I've already found one this game

Who?

u

Whoops. Reading his ISO involves a huge loss of context, evidently.

The rest of my statements still stand.

[yessiree]

what can i say

l2dealwithit

[Aegor]

what can i say

l2dealwithit

Believe me, I will deal with it in the appropriate manner.

[Alduskkel]

Aegor seems to want to frame it as either me or Bert and

Bert seems like he's going to claim something reasonably powerful and then try and coast on that.

You're smearing the meaning of my words. I'm not trying to coast. I have been inactive, and I said I would step it up in a week once holidays end. But, you interpreted it and smeared it as such, which concerns me. It's in my best interest to survive today.

That has nothing to do with "coasting," so where that word came from, I don't know. I already said I haven't put much effort into this game, and it's not coasting - it's the circumstances of holiday season.

Well, maybe if you would actually do something you wouldn't be accused of coasting.

Realistically, it is either you or Bert, or some other person with a case built on him/her. It was just a pragmatic statement. I hate bandwagons that start late since they tend to produce weaker reads and reveal less info about voting patterns than early and slow wagons.

And I don't like it when someone tries to say that there are only two options and I know at least one of the options is bad and there is a reasonable chance the other one is, too. Also what is an AoS? Aegor of Suspicion?

I don't recall Bob doing anything related to this, first of all -- although I could be wrong.

This is ancient, but I never responded. Bob accused Wake of something similar.

Well, yes, clearly, you are saying that Bob accused Wake of something similar. What I wanted to know was where this occurred.

I think we have different thresholds for what constitutes buddying.

And how does that affect your read on me?

[Alduskkel]

From my POV I really want a DLA or Aegor lynch, but I'm not sure how to swing that :/

[Aegor]

And I don't like it when someone tries to say that there are only two options

And I do not like cherry picking or straw men. I never said there are only two options.

and I know at least one of the options is bad and there is a reasonable chance the other one is, too.

Then I look forward to your kick-ass case on a third suspect, as was suggested in my post that contained what you erroneously reduced to a false dichotomy.

Also what is an AoS? Aegor of Suspicion?

Arm of Suspicion. Sometimes the hand is just not enough.

Well, yes, clearly, you are saying that Bob accused Wake of something similar. What I wanted to know was where this occurred.

Posts 47 and 81.

And how does that affect your read on me?

In no way.

[Alduskkel]

Bob isn't accusing Wake of buddying in those posts, I don't think.

[Aegor]

Bob isn't accusing Wake of buddying in those posts, I don't think.

I agree. I lump "offering free information is scummy" with "being ingratiating is scummy" together in my mind, since they both just seem like rejections of common sense to me. But then again, I am not swayed by ingratiation or willingness to cooperate, so maybe they are less significant to me than to others.

[implosion]

i can see myself jumping on the klickwagon after letting it simmer for a bit. Not a fan of his recent posting. I'll get into more specifics later.

[Bicephalous Bob]

aldi's recent posts are cool

Then why did you not call out the implosion vote until just now?

dunno

what can i say

l2dealwithit

you have to maintain your wagon man

why would anyone want to get on your rusty rotten horse cart when the alternative is the brand new superflashy klick HST

[Klick]

VOTE: Bob

Bob's scum trying to make himself look like Ald's partner down the road, now that I've said it.

[PhDScar]

VOTE: Bob

Bob's scum trying to make himself look like Ald's partner down the road, now that I've said it.

Have any evidence to support this claim?