Mewbie 1472 ~ Game Ovah~

[Hopkirk]

Lets pressure karlos then. He seems scummiest.

[cheesetovey]

I am fine with that, lets get something out of this scallywag!

VOTE: Karlos

[Hopkirk]

Opps thought i voted karlos in 74.

VOTE: Karlos

[cheesetovey]

I think we should also try XLAV

[Karlos4]

Lets pressure karlos then. He seems scummiest.

Why am I getting voted on? I briefly skimmed the posts, due to me having a lack of time.

I voted on Pharphis as his "was just a joke" seemed like a lame excuse and his actions suspicious.

Bipolar chemist also has put himself on my suspicious list, as he backs up Pharphis defense. What a coincidence that you two guys played with eachother before...!? Guys wake up and smell the coffee. BC and Pharphis explain Pharphis weird behaviour by using some material - not accessable to us - to explain it. This seems very scummy, on top of that, you two guys have happened to play with eachother. Something smells foul and is not right about the situation.

My vote will definitely stay with Pharphis. That doesnt meen BC is off the hook though!

[Pharphis]

His reason for voting you and you saying it's fine. I didn't want someone to hammer you especially if bpc was thinking you just might be town

I'm just not sure who to vote for now

why is BPC's opinion especially important for your vote?

Lets pressure karlos then. He seems scummiest.

Why am I getting voted on? I briefly skimmed the posts, due to me having a lack of time.

I voted on Pharphis as his "was just a joke" seemed like a lame excuse and his actions suspicious.

Bipolar chemist also has put himself on my suspicious list, as he backs up Pharphis defense. What a coincidence that you two guys played with eachother before...!? Guys wake up and smell the coffee. BC and Pharphis explain Pharphis weird behaviour by using some material - not accessable to us - to explain it. This seems very scummy, on top of that, you two guys have happened to play with eachother. Something smells foul and is not right about the situation.

My vote will definitely stay with Pharphis. That doesnt meen BC is off the hook though!

Just because we've played together and know to some extent how one another plays does NOT represent us being a team in this game in any way.
Also all of the material is available on the incgamers forums if you don't believe me or BPC.

I don't know BPC's true motivations but I do have town read on him so far.

Can you elaborate on which actions are suspicious and why?

[Hopkirk]

@Karl: Want to explain why his play was scummy then? Seems a lot like you're just wagoning atm.

[cheesetovey]

hah it worked, I did not think it would work

[Hopkirk]

Getting the scallywag?

[cheesetovey]

yes, getting the scallywag.

[Karlos4]

@Karl: Want to explain why his play was scummy then? Seems a lot like you're just wagoning atm.

#104 is my explanation. What didnt you get about that part?

[Karlos4]

What is scummy about it?
We have no information and it was specifically to get reads from people.
Whether that was successful or not I don't know yet, but if it helps you believe it was intentional and not a slip I have been playing forum mafia for ~1.5 years now on another forum and hosted my own games (I am right now!)

How should that actually help getting reads from other players??
Stating that your nonsense is nonsense, doesn´t really have much influence on the game.

[Hopkirk]

"his actions suspicious"
Statement=/=explination. What about his actions suggests a scum motivation.

[cheesetovey]

Lets pressure karlos then. He seems scummiest.

Why am I getting voted on? I briefly skimmed the posts, due to me having a lack of time.

I voted on Pharphis as his "was just a joke" seemed like a lame excuse and his actions suspicious.

Bipolar chemist also has put himself on my suspicious list, as he backs up Pharphis defense. What a coincidence that you two guys played with eachother before...!? Guys wake up and smell the coffee. BC and Pharphis explain Pharphis weird behaviour by using some material - not accessable to us - to explain it. This seems very scummy, on top of that, you two guys have happened to play with eachother. Something smells foul and is not right about the situation.

My vote will definitely stay with Pharphis. That doesnt meen BC is off the hook though!

I definitively think that bpc and pharphis is a possibility, although I feel I would need more evidence to be fully convinced of the mafia duo

[Pharphis]

What is scummy about it?
We have no information and it was specifically to get reads from people.
Whether that was successful or not I don't know yet, but if it helps you believe it was intentional and not a slip I have been playing forum mafia for ~1.5 years now on another forum and hosted my own games (I am right now!)

How should that actually help getting reads from other players??
Stating that your nonsense is nonsense, doesn´t really have much influence on the game.

To see
1) in which ways people would contradict me,
2) who would vote first and who would follow,
3) who was could contradict their own words by either voting for or against me and saying otherwise
..

The list of potential things goes on and on. I had no way to predict how players would react but i'm beginning to think that your actions are most suspect.
stubborn tends to = mafia imo. It's easy to get away with voting and lynching a townie if you're stubborn about it.

And yeah you still haven't really explained what was scummy about my actions.

VOTE: Karlos

AND if my "nonsense" doesn't really have much influence on the game I don't know how it could be a scummy thing to do

[cheesetovey]

When do we get a vote count from our fluffy cat mod

[Guyett]

I think our mod is on a road trip with another member so it'll be a short bit until we get vote counts. I can do unofficial vote counts if needed when I get home from the pub

[cheesetovey]

That would be appreciated!

[Guyett]

1.01

With Nine Players alive.. It takes five to lynch

Voting:

King Kenny - Guyett, [1]
XLAV -
Karlos4 - Cheesetovey, Hopkirk, Pharphis [3]
cheesetovey -
BipolarChemist -
Pharphis - BipolarChemist, , XLAV, Karlos4 [3]
FSnake -
Hopkirk -
Guyett -

Not Voting:

King Kenny, FSnake, [2]

Countdowns

(expired on 2014-02-04 18:31:00)

[Guyett]

Thats an unofficial vote count btw

[cheesetovey]

UNVOTE: karlos

VOTE: pharphis

Guys I'm done pressuring karlos, I think karlos is fine for now, my vote goes back to pharph now

[penguin_alien]

1.02

With Nine Players alive.. It takes five to lynch

Voting:

King Kenny - Guyett [1]
XLAV -
Karlos4 - Hopkirk, Pharphis [2]
cheesetovey -
BipolarChemist -
Pharphis - BipolarChemist, XLAV, Karlos4, cheesetovey [4]
FSnake -
Hopkirk -
Guyett -

Not Voting:

King Kenny, FSnake [2]

Countdowns

(expired on 2014-02-04 18:31:00)

[King Kenny]

I'm feeling the urge to hammer right about now.

[BipolarChemist]

A little early don't ya think, Ken?

Unvote

[Pharphis]

UNVOTE: karlos

VOTE: pharphis

Guys I'm done pressuring karlos, I think karlos is fine for now, my vote goes back to pharph now

If Karlos is scum you are scum, end of story.

This is the scummiest post of the game....


WHY are you done pressuring karlos? Were you happy with his answers? Which ones and why?