NY 170: Georgetown II (Game Over)

[Nobody Special]

VOTE: emogirl123


(See how I subtly inserted myself into Maestro's townbloc? Smooth, huh?)

[emogirl123]

After his 124, I was ready to attack the first person that dropped an actual case for Garmr. What you read as me chainsaw defending Garmr, was in fact a post to induce a case from Aegor since he didn't give any.

[emogirl123]

I'm still fine with voting Bulbazak. Garmr's wagon was the most easily abused and Bulbazak had the strongest push to abuse it.

[emogirl123]

to be continued . . .

[Bulbazak]

I don't see him admitting that he wasn't aware there were no PRs at the time of my initial post if he was scum.

Yes, because there's absolutely no reason scum would lie.

[Bulbazak]

After his 124, I was ready to attack the first person that dropped an actual case for Garmr.

an actual case for Garmr.

actual case

actual case

[emogirl123]

So you suggest that every scum push must have no case? Makes this game rather easy. I didn't say scum wouldn't lie. I don't see scum lying about knowing there aren't PRs in the game, only to retract later and admit he didn't know. Seems genuine. I have to get some sleep now, I'm sure we can continue discussing how obviously scum you are for pushing Garmr's wagon tomorrow.

[Aegor]

I am happier than ever with my vote.

Why does it matter that he didn't vote you? It's irrelevant to what his role is. Seems awfully discrediting.

Garmr told people to join the wagon on me that he himself was not even on. Enough said. And I never mentioned anything about his role at all. Given that this is a

mountainous

game, the only thing that matters is alignment anyway.

Your posts are horribad.

[emogirl123]

I keep mixing the word alignment with the word role. I use both interchangeably by accident. I know he told people to join a wagon on you when he was not on your wagon. What does this have to do with his alignment? Although I do agree that it is a null tell. I have more of a problem with Bulbazak, because he posted a case that was clearly bullshit.

[Aegor]

I keep mixing the word alignment with the word role. I use both interchangeably by accident. I know he told people to join a wagon on you when he was not on your wagon. What does this have to do with his alignment?

Although I do agree that it is a null tell

.

I absolutely do not find it a null tell. It is incredibly scummy.

[emogirl123]

I absolutely do not find it a null tell. It is incredibly scummy.

I agree that it is a null tell on you for being this.

[Bulbazak]

So you suggest that every scum push must have no case?

No, I didn't say anything of the kind. What you just said was that you were ready to attack

anybody

who made

an actual case

on Garmr. Not just a case, but an

actual

case. Do you know what the connotation of that is? That means that you prepared yourself to vote for anybody who had a

genuine

reason to find Garmr to be scum and lynch him. A genuine reason. That means that you were preparing yourself to vote town with a case against Garmr, meaning that you

knew

Garmr's alignment. You say that you're not defending him? I call bull crap, because you admitted yourself that you prepared yourself to vote the first town with an actual case. This wasn't a spur of the moment decision. It was a premeditated action to keep a wagon from forming on Garmr.

I didn't say scum wouldn't lie.

That's funny. You seem to be implying it.

I don't see scum lying about knowing there aren't PRs in the game, only to retract later and admit he didn't know.

I absolutely do not find it a null tell. It is incredibly scummy.

I agree that it is a null tell on you for being this.

Words. Learn to use them.

Unvote

Vote Emogirl123

We can argue about Garmr later, but we have guaranteed scum right here.

[Maestro]

yo Garmr, where you at bro?
I see you visited the site this afternoon, y u no post

[Garmr]

Wow just wow. I be vocal and I get this much response.

Going to be honest I fused acidic taco and Aegor into one person in my mind for some reason. Probably not a good reason but yep it is.

But peoples reactions over me are great A lot of information came from it.

Basically emogirl defended me and bulb went full out over me. what we can get between the two if one is scum the other is not of the same alignment.

We can argue about Garmr later, but we have guaranteed scum right here.

I can sort out this right here I'm town so no need for latter.

yo Garmr, where you at bro?
I see you visited the site this afternoon, y u no post

Because you ninjaed me.

I was on this morning as well but couldn't post because I was in the middle of study.

[Garmr]

Still looking back over the posts and reading up and making judgements.

[Bulbazak]

We can argue about Garmr later, but we have guaranteed scum right here.

I can sort out this right here I'm town so no need for latter.

Why would you being town make Emo town?

[Garmr]

Didn't say that bulb read again I said I would save you time and say I am town.

[Garmr]

oh just reliazed my typo latter= later.

[Garmr]

VOTE: emogirl123
Felt she is scummy after a read I'd also prefer to defend myself than have someone else defend me and if you think what I have to say is bollocks why are you town reading me.


Quick list town
Bulb

maestro

emeraldemon-This one needs a little explaining. This is based on his attitude which doesn't come as scummy to me and the interactions people have had with him make me think his bait. He also seems inquisitive bad point is he caught up in that wifomy multiscum thing.

kabooooom

scum
Emo
Aegor
Acidic taco/slandy These two are Not strong scum reads but still reads none the less.

Also to aegor

The main point was he was using that to sneak a opportunistic vote under with out explaining himself. What do you think of his voting so far?


We are on page 6. This is a large game. What detailed explanation were you expecting?

Maybe the actual reason itself why you agreed with emo.

Also noting your relationship with EMO even through she just put words in your mouth you didn't question her straight away.

Why didn't you?


Didn't answer your other two questions because it was my stupidity for not voting you and fusing you as one person with another player and they are linked.

[Aegor]

Maybe the actual reason itself why you agreed with emo.

What the fuck are you talking about? Are my direct responses

disagreeing

with emo somehow insufficient for you?

Also noting your relationship with EMO even through she just put words in your mouth you didn't question her straight away.

Why didn't you?

See above. I do not see how anyone could interpret my responses as anything close to "relationship with EMO." If this were not mountainous, I would try everything I could to have both you and Emo annihilated utterly.

Didn't answer your other two questions because it was my stupidity for not voting you and fusing you as one person with another player and they are linked.

What other two questions?

[Bulbazak]

If this were not mountainous, I would try everything I could to have both you and Emo annihilated utterly.

What does it being mountainous have to do with anything?

[Aegor]

If this were not mountainous, I would try everything I could to have both you and Emo annihilated utterly.

What does it being mountainous have to do with anything?

Vigs, obvobv.

[Garmr]

Maybe the actual reason itself why you agreed with emo.

What the fuck are you talking about? Are my direct responses

disagreeing

with emo somehow insufficient for you?

You did agree with emo at

What is the point of speculation? If we care that much, NL today and see how many people die. Otherwise, let us just proceed seeking out scummy people.

VOTE: Garmr

She was the only one voting me and your vote came on with no reason. Which means you were sheeping a wagon and agreeing with emo

Also noting your relationship with EMO even through she just put words in your mouth you didn't question her straight away.

Why didn't you?

See above. I do not see how anyone could interpret my responses as anything close to "relationship with EMO." If this were not mountainous, I would try everything I could to have both you and Emo annihilated utterly.

You never mentioned this before bulba started scum reading emo why If you really wanted emo gone wouldn't of you voiced it earlier when you were disagreeing..

Didn't answer your other two questions because it was my stupidity for not voting you and fusing you as one person with another player and they are linked.

What other two questions?

The ones revolving around not voting you in post 129 question 1 and 3 this can be answered by me fusing you and acidic together in my mind.

[Garmr]

In post 117, Aegor wrote:
What is the point of speculation? If we care that much, NL today and see how many people die. Otherwise, let us just proceed seeking out scummy people.

VOTE: Garmr

She was the only one voting me and your vote came on with no reason. Which means you were sheeping a wagon and agreeing with emo

Not quite true just remembered a rvs vote on me. She was the only one voting me with a case (flawed but still a case.)

[Huntress]

bump