NY 170: Georgetown II (Game Over)
-
-
Maestro They/Them/AnyJack of All TradesThey/Them/Any
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8381
- Joined: April 18, 2012
- Pronoun: They/Them/Any
- Location: Chronically Online (EST)
-
-
Huntress Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3457
- Joined: February 26, 2008
- Location: UK
Vote Count 1.3
emogirl123 (4) - Maestro, Nobody Special, Bulbazak, Garmr
Garmr (2) - OhGodMyLife, Aegor
Aegor (2) - Brian Skies, Acidic_TACO
Acidic_TACO (1) - emeraldemon
emeraldemon (1) - Tebow
Maenara (1) - Sotty7
Brian Skies (1) - Chevre
Nobody Special (1) - WBOCampfire1104
Tebow (1) - The Goodfather
Bulbazak (1) - emogirl123
Not voting (4) - Albert B. Rampage, kabooooom, Maenara, Slandaar
With nineteen players alive, it takes ten votes to lynch.
Deadline for Day One is Tuesday, 4th February 20.00 GMT, (in (expired on 2014-02-04 20:00:00)).Last edited by Huntress on Thu Jan 23, 2014 5:38 am, edited 1 time in total..-
-
Maestro They/Them/AnyJack of All TradesThey/Them/Any
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8381
- Joined: April 18, 2012
- Pronoun: They/Them/Any
- Location: Chronically Online (EST)
-
-
Aegor Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4898
- Joined: August 11, 2007
- Location: Omega Station
OMG unbelievable. Voting for the same person is not the same thing as conscious agreement. Did I mention emo's reasoning at all? Was there any indication whatsoever that my vote was in any way connected with hers? I did not even know whom she was voting.In post 197, Garmr wrote: You did agree with emo at...She was the only one voting me and your vote came on with no reason. Which means you were sheeping a wagon and agreeing with emo
By your bogus reasoning, anyone who happens to RVS someone who has previously been voted is "sheeping a wagon."
The tone of my posts speaks for itself. Unless you are suggesting that I engage in liberal FoSes, we are done here.You never mentioned this before bulba started scum reading emo why If you really wanted emo gone wouldn't of you voiced it earlier when you were disagreeing.
In post 194, Aegor wrote:The ones revolving around not voting you in post 129 question 1 and 3 this can be answered by me fusing you and acidic together in my mind.LINKto them. I still have no idea what you are talking about.Currently partying at the-- a Large Normal for 21 revelers.M A S Q U E R A D E-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Next time go back and look at your own post yourself.In post 203, Aegor wrote:
OMG unbelievable. Voting for the same person is not the same thing as conscious agreement. Did I mention emo's reasoning at all? Was there any indication whatsoever that my vote was in any way connected with hers? I did not even know whom she was voting.In post 197, Garmr wrote: You did agree with emo at...She was the only one voting me and your vote came on with no reason. Which means you were sheeping a wagon and agreeing with emo
By your bogus reasoning, anyone who happens to RVS someone who has previously been voted is "sheeping a wagon."
The tone of my posts speaks for itself. Unless you are suggesting that I engage in liberal FoSes, we are done here.You never mentioned this before bulba started scum reading emo why If you really wanted emo gone wouldn't of you voiced it earlier when you were disagreeing.
In post 194, Aegor wrote:The ones revolving around not voting you in post 129 question 1 and 3 this can be answered by me fusing you and acidic together in my mind.LINKto them. I still have no idea what you are talking about.
quote="In post 129, Aegor"]Are you serious, Garmr? Your posts 27 and 55 bothered me (purely emotional reaction).
I never advocated for a NL. It is bad. And if people agree, then there is no reason to bother speculating about the number of scum groups, which is exactly what I said. My vote was not opportunistic (what opportunity), not OMGUSy (you were not voting me), and not nonsensical (what made it nonsense?).This a scummy post as a no lynch is a bad idea and you never point out reasoning why I you think I am scummy. This is opportunistic,omgussy and a nonsensical this where people should vote.
We are on page 6. This is a large game. What detailed explanation were you expecting?The main point was he was using that to sneak a opportunistic vote under with out explaining himself. What do you think of his voting so far?
[quote]So everyone join the Aegor wagon or if you think I'm scum vote me let get things moving.[/quote]
You are not even ON my wagon. After all that, you are not even voting me?
I am happier than ever with my vote.[/quote]
here see the questions now?-
-
Aegor Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4898
- Joined: August 11, 2007
- Location: Omega Station
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Brian Skies Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10378
- Joined: August 9, 2013
- Location: Raining On Your Parade
-
-
Tebow Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 443
- Joined: January 9, 2012
- Location: Kneeling in your end zone
Unvote, Vote: Bulbazak
Emogirl's play can be very concisely summed up as 'Garmr is dumbass town.' Bulbazak's harping on the use of the phrase 'actual case' to derive the idea that emogirl has admitted she wants to vote town is just craplogic in extremis. Maybe he's just bad enough to think that two players derping around in pre-game is an actual indication of a scum link, but the alternative hypothesis, which is more charitable about his ability and less about his motives, seems totally plausible.-
-
Slandaar
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
emogirl123 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: October 21, 2013
- Location: arizonaa
-
-
Albert B. Rampage Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 27261
- Joined: April 8, 2007
- Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
-
-
emogirl123 Mafia Scum
-
-
Maestro They/Them/AnyJack of All TradesThey/Them/Any
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8381
- Joined: April 18, 2012
- Pronoun: They/Them/Any
- Location: Chronically Online (EST)
...wtfIn post 211, emogirl123 wrote:maestro yours is clearly bigger than mine. vote bulbazak please, or else i'm forced to scum read you for shrinkage.-
-
Maestro They/Them/AnyJack of All TradesThey/Them/Any
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8381
- Joined: April 18, 2012
- Pronoun: They/Them/Any
- Location: Chronically Online (EST)
-
-
emogirl123 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: October 21, 2013
- Location: arizonaa
Incase it was too subtle, I clearly can't summon votes from the Netherworld of Townbloc, so I pale in comparison to you. Now that we established what you wanted to establish, care to vote bulbazak? Hint: He's scum.
p.edit: How am I ignoring everything. Seems to me like you are the one ignoring everything.-
-
Maestro They/Them/AnyJack of All TradesThey/Them/Any
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8381
- Joined: April 18, 2012
- Pronoun: They/Them/Any
- Location: Chronically Online (EST)
In post 161, emogirl123 wrote:In post 156, Maestro wrote:1) Bulba's "accusation" doesn't look at all serious to me, it was the first time in his ISO (3 posts total) that he'd mentioned either one of you.
why isn't it serious? he placed a 3rd vote (4th if you count the RVS) on someone. he then made a very serious accusation about chainsaw afterwards. seems pretty serious to me
2) It was kindof obvious at that point that you had at least a null-leaning-Town read on Garmr.
ok?
3) You "outing" a Townread is inconsistent with you saying you weren't trying to defend him in post #133, because...he associated me with Garmr so I defend myself by saying Garmr is clearly town and this isn't defending myself??
you seem mad.
I don't mind your exchange with Bulbazak, but this is pretty much all you've said about what I've posted so ???In post 162, emogirl123 wrote:I'll be back later, I feel that we both need to cool off for a bit.
Also I think you are very confused as to what I was trying to do today, but do go on ignoring m-
-
emogirl123 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: October 21, 2013
- Location: arizonaa
You made an emotional judgement that you dislike my personality and as a result of this, went on a tangent of how I should have waited for Garmr to post before addressing Bulbazak directly. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt that you genuinely found me annoying and that was to knock me off of my high horse. Now reread the game without that bias and give your thoughts on Bulbazak.In post 216, emogirl123 wrote:How am I ignoring everything. Seems to me like you are the one ignoring everything.-
-
Maestro They/Them/AnyJack of All TradesThey/Them/Any
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8381
- Joined: April 18, 2012
- Pronoun: They/Them/Any
- Location: Chronically Online (EST)
also just saw this - the progression from "lol is this scumtheatre?" THEN to "dual scumreads after a possible chainsaw" doesn't really make sense to me, but I might not be understanding correctlyIn post 168, Bulbazak wrote:
I feel I've been pretty clear. I had an early inclination of possible scum theatre. I watched Garmr scum it up and wondered if I was right. I then saw Emo defend him against all his accusers. After that I voted and pursued my reads. What are you unclear on?In post 166, Maestro wrote:
...yup now you're not making sense.In post 164, Bulbazak wrote:Actually, it's pretty serious, especially for the early game. I have very good scumreads on the pair, and I plan to pursue them.
Do tell.
P-Edit: ...I made a personal judgement of you???-
-
emogirl123 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: October 21, 2013
- Location: arizonaa
Seems to me like it. You were biased when saying that Bulbazak was not serious about his posts when it was clear to me that he was serious. You tell me that since I ignored Garmr's point of view, apparently I am guilty of some kind of tunnel vision in some meta where you watched with your skin crawling.
I go on explaining to you that Bulbazak made an attack on both Garmr and I. So if I relied solely on Garmr's defence when he has shown to be flaily, this risks the momentum of getting both Garmr and I mislynched. I just didn't word it very nicely and this most likely caused you to tunnel me for being arrogant.-
-
Maestro They/Them/AnyJack of All TradesThey/Them/Any
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8381
- Joined: April 18, 2012
- Pronoun: They/Them/Any
- Location: Chronically Online (EST)
oh you mean this...In post 137, Maestro wrote:shhh, quiet you - not talking to you
(also stop claiming VT, it's annoying)
don't take me so seriously, I was just being a bitch and ordering you around
now engage with me (for lolz and because you might as well if you're going to ignore your wagon)
why is Bulba Scum again? (I don't care if you've said it before, I want it plain and simpleand so I can point and laugh)
P-Edit: not tunneling on you at all, IMO, but ok, calm down now <3
I know Bulba from multiple games and outside of games so I thought I could read his personal attitude better than I obviously can, and FTR I don't think it's realistic to say that either of you would be snowball-lynched off of an accusation before page 10. And EVEN THEN, odds are we're smart enough as a Town to NOT mislynch twice in a row for the same reasons in the same situation.-
-
emogirl123 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: October 21, 2013
- Location: arizonaa
I want you to explain. We established that Bulbazak was serious about his accusations. You said earlier that he wasn't serious. In this post was you trying to see if he was serious or not. Now that we established that he is serious, why are you not giving reads and placing the responsibility on my shoulders. I voted for him because his accusation of Garmr and I was serious.In post 135, Maestro wrote:Bulba the fuck are you on about-
-
Maestro They/Them/AnyJack of All TradesThey/Them/Any
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8381
- Joined: April 18, 2012
- Pronoun: They/Them/Any
- Location: Chronically Online (EST)
-
-
Maestro They/Them/AnyJack of All TradesThey/Them/Any
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8381
- Joined: April 18, 2012
- Pronoun: They/Them/Any
- Location: Chronically Online (EST)
and also because that helps Scum realize who they could push and also because it's a game of 7 or 8 people right nowIn post 223, Maestro wrote:I'm not giving reads because I don't have to
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-