Micro 289: Vanilla Town Mafia (GAME OVER!)

Mr_Blonde · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Fri Jan 24, 2014 10:29 am

Now that I think about it:

MODGod, has Yates picked up his PM yet?

I will have a sad if he gets replaced.

~Not yet, but he has 10 hours left on his prod

goodmorning · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:01 pm

In post 23, Freshmaniscoolman wrote:No, the fact that he is new doesn't make him vulnerable to the game, if he is new and wants to be treated like a new person, he can go join a newbie game.

Did I say anything about treating him as a new person or not? I'm just saying it's obvious why he didn't RV.

Let me ask again: Why not join one of the existing wagons?

In post 24, Mr_Blonde wrote:
In post 17, goodmorning wrote:@BLONDE:
reasons lol
Lol k. Explain them plz?

Well, it's basically 22 minus the sarcasm.

In post 19, goodmorning wrote:You didn't join a wagon and you picked a rather hackneyed excuse to vote someone - not to mention that that someone joined 5 days ago and is quite possibly unfamiliar with site meta.
Why is him not joining one of the wagons sus? Also, why do you think his reason for voting is bad? The logic I think you're applying here could said of both actions IRT Fresh's vote and Rob's non-vote.

It isn't

very

suspicious, but when the alternative is the vote he made...

I think the reason is bad because it's literally "why didn't you RV?" I can tell you why he didn't RV. He isn't familiar with site meta.

Mr_Blonde · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Fri Jan 24, 2014 12:29 pm

I think that's an assumption on your part there.

Granted, it's possible. But it's also possible that he didn't vote to avoid early associations, which is what I am thinking was your reason for voting Fresh for not joining a wagon.

Also, I asked for your reasoning IRT to your counter-wagon statement and subsequent vote on me, not for the switch to Fresh.

goodmorning · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Fri Jan 24, 2014 2:50 pm

Yeah, 22 is that. Mild reaction test/injoke.

goodmorning · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Fri Jan 24, 2014 2:53 pm

He said "I voted for the same reasons you voted Blonde" and I responded with 22, saying sarcastically... and so on.

Mr_Blonde · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Fri Jan 24, 2014 3:02 pm

I have no idea what you are saying.

Post 22 was addressed to me??

goodmorning · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Fri Jan 24, 2014 4:20 pm

Addressed to him about you.

Mr_Blonde · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Fri Jan 24, 2014 4:34 pm

Hm, still not following but I can say that I do not know Fresh.

Freshmaniscoolman · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Sat Jan 25, 2014 5:33 am

I didn't join one of the wagons because I didn't want to put someone on L-1.

theslimer3 · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Sat Jan 25, 2014 11:51 am

Lark replaces Yates, starting immediately.

Lark · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Sat Jan 25, 2014 12:10 pm

Vote: Fresh

There's nothing wrong with not voting in RVS. Not much wrong with putting someone at L-1 in RVS either.

goodmorning · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Sat Jan 25, 2014 1:36 pm

In post 32, Mr_Blonde wrote:Hm, still not following but I can say that I do not know Fresh.

I was saying in 22 that I voted you as a mild reaction test/injoke. I said further that it was surprising that he (Fresh) had such a relationship with a newer player (KK).

In post 33, Freshmaniscoolman wrote:I didn't join one of the wagons because I didn't want to put someone on L-1.

It would have been L-2, not L-1.

In post 35, Lark wrote:
Vote: Fresh

There's nothing wrong with not voting in RVS. Not much wrong with putting someone at L-1 in RVS either.

Hmmmmm.

Mr_Blonde · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Sat Jan 25, 2014 2:42 pm

In post 35, Lark wrote:
Vote: Fresh

There's nothing wrong with not voting in RVS. Not much wrong with putting someone at L-1 in RVS either.

Hi Lark. I see you are replacing my fran Yates

You scum?

In post 36, goodmorning wrote:
In post 32, Mr_Blonde wrote:Hm, still not following but I can say that I do not know Fresh.
I was saying in 22 that I voted you as a mild reaction test/injoke. I said further that it was surprising that he (Fresh) had such a relationship with a newer player (KK).

Ah, okay. You and those reaction tests.

goodmorning · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Sat Jan 25, 2014 2:44 pm

Well. I didn't exactly get what I was looking for from this one, but that means little as it wasn't particularly serious.

Flames of Disaster · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Sat Jan 25, 2014 5:15 pm

dead game really

Mr_Blonde · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Sat Jan 25, 2014 6:27 pm

Yepppp.

@GM - what'd you expect?

@Lark - you think Fresh is scum? Why do you think him voting someone for not voting is scummy?

Lark · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Sat Jan 25, 2014 11:48 pm

In post 36, goodmorning wrote:It would have been L-2, not L-1.

No, it would have been L-1. With seven players it's four to lynch.

In post 37, Mr_Blonde wrote:Hi Lark. I see you are replacing my fran Yates

You scum?

Nope, I'm the good guy that comes to the rescue.

In post 39, Flames of Disaster wrote:dead game really

For encouraging apathy you get this award...

Vote: Flames of Disaster

Town want to move the game forward.

In post 40, Mr_Blonde wrote:@Lark - you think Fresh is scum? Why do you think him voting someone for not voting is scummy?

The jury is still out on that one.

goodmorning · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Sun Jan 26, 2014 4:46 am

In post 40, Mr_Blonde wrote:@GM - what'd you expect?

Well, I expected you to either joke about my vote on you (as either alignment) or completely ignore it (probably Scum). You simply asked about it.

In post 41, Lark wrote:
In post 36, goodmorning wrote:It would have been L-2, not L-1.
No, it would have been L-1. With seven players it's four to lynch.

Well that explains a lot. I've been playing too many Newbies.

In post 39, Flames of Disaster wrote:dead game really
For encouraging apathy you get this award...

Vote: Flames of Disaster

Town want to move the game forward.

Does commenting about how dead the game is encourage apathy? How so?

Lark · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:12 am

In post 42, goodmorning wrote:Does commenting about how dead the game is encourage apathy? How so?

It wasn't so much the comment as what he did after it.

goodmorning · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:21 am

That's fair.

@Flames: Are you an alt?

Mr_Blonde · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:41 pm

unvote; vote Flames

Let's stir the pot.

Talk people.

goodmorning · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Mon Jan 27, 2014 3:15 am

I agree with the above assessment but have nothing new to say and am satisfied with my current vote.

Lark · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Mon Jan 27, 2014 9:15 am

King Kenny and Rob W are posting in other games but not here. So is the mod for that matter.

@ Mod: Have the missing players been prodded?

theslimer3 · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Mon Jan 27, 2014 1:35 pm

Excellent idea! I will certainly get to that when I get back >.<

goodmorning · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Mon Jan 27, 2014 4:26 pm

Lark is being awfully helpful...