Micro 293: One and Done! Mafia--Game Over!

FuDuzn · Post Post #100 (ISO) » Wed Feb 05, 2014 5:54 pm

A non comittal statment that comments on another non comittal statment, whithout actually voting for the person who you think may be scum, is definitely worthy of a real vote.

What wouldn't you vote Zekrom?

T S O · Post Post #101 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:06 am

In post 81, Cabd wrote:
In post 80, BoroPhil wrote:so what the hell happened there then?
Our resident man-with-three-assholes brought up an ongoing game, Penguin dealt with it, we're moving on.

People voting Zekrom: What the fuck is wrong with you?

Hey sexy.

In post 95, Cabd wrote:I didn't count. His homesite is the same as several other newbies here, PO.

I haven't seen him around PO.

Naio · Post Post #102 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2014 12:38 pm

In post 100, FuDuzn wrote:A non comittal statment that comments on another non comittal statment, whithout actually voting for the person who you think may be scum, is definitely worthy of a real vote.

What wouldn't you vote Zekrom?

just so we are clear, you are calling me out for not voting zekrom, and saying that i should have voted him if i was making that comment.

well let me blow your mind - i WAS ALREADY VOTING zekrom.

read up before you accuse someone of something. lazy play.

VOTE: FuDuzn

FuDuzn · Post Post #103 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2014 12:44 pm

UNVOTE:

Fair enough, completely missed that you voted him.

I don't like your reaction to my faux pas though, not personally, but in game.

FuDuzn · Post Post #104 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2014 1:10 pm

Actually, I probably would react in a similar manner, so I guess I can't fault him. Seems like a natural reaction to me.

Naio · Post Post #105 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2014 1:12 pm

good, now that that's done

VOTE: zekrom

penguin_alien · Post Post #106 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:20 pm

Vote Count 1.06:

With nine alive, it takes five to lynch!

Cabd (L-5):
FuDuzn (L-3): Zekrom25, T S O
Zekrom25 (L-3): Malakittens, Naio
BoroPhil (L-4): Bulbazak
Bulbazak (L-5):
Malakittens (L-5):
JasonWazza (L-3): Cabd, BoroPhil
T S O (L-4): JasonWazza
Naio (L-5):

Not voting: FuDuzn

V/LA:

Deadline in (expired on 2014-02-15 14:07:55)

Cabd · Post Post #107 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:23 pm

In post 105, Naio wrote:good, now that that's done

VOTE: zekrom

Since you're voting zekrom please answer the same questions I asked malakittens.

Malakittens · Post Post #108 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:47 pm

VOTE: Jasonwazza

Bulbazak · Post Post #109 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2014 6:00 pm

Why Jason?

Naio · Post Post #110 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2014 7:37 pm

cabd - my read has nothing to do with his "possible roles" post. i dont like how he's played this game so far, can barely find a post that has decent content he's lurking and posting BS, not addressing anything or anyone.

Now, how about a single read, on anyone, from you? all you've done is ask questions and tell other people they're stupid. please contribute something.

FuDuzn · Post Post #111 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2014 8:40 pm

Wait a sec, naio.......why were you so concerned with my vote on you?

Kind of feels like you put pressure on me so that I would take pressure off of you. And yes, my pressure on you was misguided, but still......your vote on me and then back to Zekrom after I unvoted you seems......strangely timed.

Malakittens · Post Post #112 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2014 8:43 pm

In post 109, Bulbazak wrote:Why Jason?

Because he's lurking.

(Yes I'm going after lurkers this game)

Cabd · Post Post #113 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2014 8:56 pm

In post 110, Naio wrote:Now, how about a single read, on anyone, from you? all you've done is ask questions and tell other people they're stupid. please contribute something.

Is there a reason you dislike the style of play I employ? I am generating interactions that I can datamine in a relevant fashion when compared to older baselines.

I will give my reads, and a serious vote, when I am damn well ready to.

Bulbazak · Post Post #114 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2014 8:57 pm

I don't have any experience with scum Jason, but if memory serves, he lurks as town.

Cabd · Post Post #115 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2014 8:58 pm

In post 114, Bulbazak wrote:I don't have any experience with scum Jason, but if memory serves, he lurks as town.

The lurking in and of itself is a null tell for him. It's what he posts between the prod dodges that makes it or breaks it.

FuDuzn · Post Post #116 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2014 9:02 pm

Are we really talking a lynch all lurkers situation?

T S O · Post Post #117 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2014 9:12 pm

In post 112, Malakittens wrote:
In post 109, Bulbazak wrote:Why Jason?
Because he's lurking.

(Yes I'm going after lurkers this game)

Why?

BoroPhil · Post Post #118 (ISO) » Thu Feb 06, 2014 9:17 pm

does Bulbazak fancy explaining his vote?

Zekrom25 · Post Post #119 (ISO) » Fri Feb 07, 2014 12:49 am

un-Vote

Vote: Jasonwazza

today has been long & i'm tired

BoroPhil · Post Post #120 (ISO) » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:09 am

er, yeah, my vote was RVS. Let's not have him at L-1

UNVOTE:

BoroPhil · Post Post #121 (ISO) » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:10 am

In fact Zekrom, that vote looks pretty awful with your reasoning. I'm up for lynching lurkers usually but it's such an easy way for scum to get a day one mislynch

Naio · Post Post #122 (ISO) » Fri Feb 07, 2014 4:21 am

In post 113, Cabd wrote:Is there a reason you dislike the style of play I employ? I am generating interactions that I can datamine in a relevant fashion when compared to older baselines.

I will give my reads, and a serious vote, when I am damn well ready to.

yes, i do have a problem with you thinking that you can not give any reads of your own and just ask questions. if you are town, it makes it very difficult to judge your interactions once flips start to happen and therefore you're playing bad town. if you are scum, it's a smart play.

Bulbazak · Post Post #123 (ISO) » Fri Feb 07, 2014 7:17 am

In post 118, BoroPhil wrote:does Bulbazak fancy explaining his vote?

No.

BoroPhil · Post Post #124 (ISO) » Fri Feb 07, 2014 8:49 am

ok then.

VOTE: zekrom