Alright, I can't take it anymore.
I know that I should theoretically vote Skelda, but GR seems so much worse to me.
The switch to voting phok was way too quick, especially since he didn't even like most of the evidence against him. On top of that, we lost 7 days of discussion and a theoretical chance at a deathread list from a townie (if phok had been town), which is very bad.
#559: Asking phok why he acted the way he did after the hammer seemed to me like a poor attempt at distancing.
#575: "but only professionals would do that." Firstly, phok was an SE, so if I was scum with him he may have told me to do just that. Secondly, making a hard read based on me being a newb seems fishy. Seems more to me like he was tooting his own horn a bit.
#587: Comes out and says he hammered phok without having evidence. He says Skelda accused him of that but...he didn't. Freudian slip?
#589: Apparently he thinks he hammered at the last moment, but I'm pretty sure we had like 7 days til deadline. Also says he hammered because he didn't have enough evidence, which sounds like the reverse of what one should do in that situation? Either way, sounds like he's basically rambling. There's no strength of reason to his posts. He also put a "case" in spoilers for us, which was a fun read, but not a single one of the points was actually valid (except maybe #3, since I still don't really know what he meant there)
#591: Highlighting something irrelevant. We already know there is only one scum left, buddying tells aren't useful for picking out scum. In fact, I'd say they are the opposite - if Skelda
was
scum, he's actually running himself into a corner by removing any plausibility in pushing a Rach mislynch. If he votes Rach now, who seems to me to be the easiest person to lynch (barring today's suspects), he's doomed.
#592: Again, he's putting way too much weight on my case, especially since he's already said he didn't really like it.
#606: Says Skelda is suspicious because he said his name three times. This one is going to be good, I'll save it til last.
#620: There does not have to be a connection, because there is only one scum left. In fact, the only possible connection is that they are both town.
And then his last ditch attempt at a defense after I declared intent was to continue arguing against the point that the hammer made him scummy. No one has been talking about that for a while, meanwhile Rach posted a very nice list of things that made him look scummy, which he didn't respond to it all. I feel like I should've stepped up to the plate and made this post earlier, but I feel like he would've reacted in the same way.
#628: He claims? Okay, maybe true to form, and maybe I'm biased, but I'm pretty confident we should all know who the PRs are. Claiming Vanilla Town literally means nothing, yet he seems to think that he's made this big sacrifice in doing so. Maybe not scummy per se, but it kind of came out of nowhere and makes me feel like its just yet another desperate attempt at defending himself without actually addressing the points on him.
And here we go, ladies and gentlemen, the nail in the coffin.
GamerRaptor wrote:
And for god's sake. Does anyone see how Suspicous Skelda is? He literally pointed fingers at me and
said my name 3 times
just because I did the final vote on scum.
GamerRaptor wrote:
Twilights, Twilights, Twilights.
This is what I mean. You have an aggressive attitude, and you fling your fingers at everyone, but mainly phok. I asked for evidence, and you only quoted YOURSELF. That isn't evidence.
You know what's evidence? WHATEVER THE HECK HE POSTED THAT WAS SCUMMISH? Excuse my language, but that is one of the stupidest pieces of evidence I have seen in my life. YOU don't make the evidence. That's like a detective saying a guy is guilty, then showing proof of only himself saying he was guilty. What did the guy do that was guilty? What was the other's opinions? You left all of this out, and this only exposes your own ignorance.
I'd suggest voting for
Twilights
. He somehow got everyone to vote for phoks with illogical evidence.
Yes, that's right. He said my name FOUR TIMES in a single post. How suspicious is that?
I'm sorry Raptor, but you've left me no choice.
VOTE: GamerRaptor
