Ugghhh that Liverpool game was brutal. For a few games now we've only turned up in the second half and it cost us today. Oh well we'll still win the League.In post 456, Porochaz wrote:
Gooner is an arsenal fan so is always going to be inherently smug about everything until they lose against Liverpool and Man City overtake them. That said, despite our difference of opinion with game mechanics, I have a slight townread on him, and I can see him doing this but I would like a more firm stance on Zekrom.
.
I was referring to the inital post where you voted on UT which I believe someone declared was hyper-town. I didn't see the reasoning and voted. Since then I haven't seen any explanation of the vote.In post 465, Green Crayons wrote:@Gooner:
I actually checked this out since I was rereading the thread. As of the time of your Post 83, Zekrom and I were both voting Tripod, but for clearly different reasons. What made my reason "just as bad" as Zekrom's? While we're at it, you can also explain why Zekrom's justification for his Tripod vote was bad, because I now think his reason for voting Tripod was valid.In post 83, Gooner wrote:VOTE: Green Crayons
I felt his vote on UT was just as bad as Zekrom's but Zekrom's the one getting all the heat for it. Best I have at the moment.
Tman? He actually explained his vote-namely that Tripod refused to answer a question. You didn't(Hint: you should also explain why you decided not to pursue another player -- not Zekrom -- who voted for Tripod for the same reason I did.)
Nope, I was referring to Zekrom and the votes on him which are bad. My vote on you is more for active lurking. Tripod's null for me, the votes on him are pretty bad but I haven't seen anything town indicative in his behaviour.While we're at it, perhaps you can explain why you think "all votes on <player> are bad and you should feel bad" is a sentiment you agree with, but apparently as applied to Tripod. What makes Tripod so incredibly town in your view?In post 252, Gooner wrote:Slightly creepily that line has become a bit of a catchphrase on the other site where I play Mafia.In post 242, Kit wrote:Oh I got another town read. All votes on Zekrom are bad and you should feel bad.
But yes the sentiment is one I definitely agree with. It's why my vote is on GC at the moment.
I did explain that.
Where
I think the same criticism can be lobbied against you in your pursuit of the Elyse vote, and with the same degree of validity. Y'all's unconvincing back-and-forth tunnel vision on each other is what strikes me as two towns going at it.In post 468, pirate mollie wrote:crayon thing this post looks good on its own but body of work? she isn't measuring up. her vote is on me but she isn't doing anything to firm up the read or doing a lot to push her nonexistent case.
The explanation should be pretty apparent from the posts quoted in my Post 71. In fact...In post 478, Gooner wrote:I was referring to the inital post where you voted on UT which I believe someone declared was hyper-town. I didn't see the reasoning and voted. Since then I haven't seen any explanation of the vote.
...No, not Tman. Tman voted Tripod in Post 53 for what appears to be essentially the same reason why Zekrom voted Tripod in Post 73.In post 478, Gooner wrote:Tman? He actually explained his vote-namely that Tripod refused to answer a question. You didn't(Hint: you should also explain why you decided not to pursue another player -- not Zekrom -- who voted for Tripod for the same reason I did.)
This explanation is nonsense. You explicitly said the reason why you were voting me is because of the sentiment that "all votes on <player> are bad and you should feel bad." You now stating that Post 252 stated that you were voting me because of some other reason (active lurking) is just a blatant falsehood.In post 478, Gooner wrote:Nope, I was referring to Zekrom and the votes on him which are bad. My vote on you is more for active lurking. Tripod's null for me, the votes on him are pretty bad but I haven't seen anything town indicative in his behaviour.While we're at it, perhaps you can explain why you think "all votes on <player> are bad and you should feel bad" is a sentiment you agree with, but apparently as applied to Tripod. What makes Tripod so incredibly town in your view?In post 252, Gooner wrote:Slightly creepily that line has become a bit of a catchphrase on the other site where I play Mafia.In post 242, Kit wrote:Oh I got another town read. All votes on Zekrom are bad and you should feel bad.
But yes the sentiment is one I definitely agree with. It's why my vote is on GC at the moment.
Well it wasn't for me. I just saw a reasonless bandwagon jump.In post 483, Green Crayons wrote:
@Gooner:
The explanation should be pretty apparent from the posts quoted in my Post 71. In fact...In post 478, Gooner wrote:I was referring to the inital post where you voted on UT which I believe someone declared was hyper-town. I didn't see the reasoning and voted. Since then I haven't seen any explanation of the vote.
Ahhh ok. Sorry, I didn't see that. Again I just saw a baseless bandwagon leap. Can you see where I'm coming from here....No, not Tman. Tman voted Tripod in Post 53 for what appears to be essentially the same reason why Zekrom voted Tripod in Post 73.In post 478, Gooner wrote:Tman? He actually explained his vote-namely that Tripod refused to answer a question. You didn't(Hint: you should also explain why you decided not to pursue another player -- not Zekrom -- who voted for Tripod for the same reason I did.)
I was referring to Marquis. (I didn't catch this until my reread.) Marquis actually stated the reasons for my own vote with her vote back in Post 49.
I'm not quite sure how my "unexplained" (scare quotes) Tripod vote could be "just as bad" (actual quotes, per your Post 83) as Zekrom's explained vote. That denotes some sort of equivalency between my vote and Zekrom's vote that I don't see. After all, I wasn't voting Tripod for the same reason as Zekrom, and you didn't even think I had a justification for my vote (unlike Zekrom). Please clarify your Post 83 comparison of me and Zekrom.
[This explanation is nonsense. You explicitly said the reason why you were voting me is because of the sentiment that "all votes on <player> are bad and you should feel bad." You now stating that Post 252 stated that you were voting me because of some other reason (active lurking) is just a blatant falsehood.In post 478, Gooner wrote:Nope, I was referring to Zekrom and the votes on him which are bad. My vote on you is more for active lurking. Tripod's null for me, the votes on him are pretty bad but I haven't seen anything town indicative in his behaviour.While we're at it, perhaps you can explain why you think "all votes on <player> are bad and you should feel bad" is a sentiment you agree with, but apparently as applied to Tripod. What makes Tripod so incredibly town in your view?In post 252, Gooner wrote:Slightly creepily that line has become a bit of a catchphrase on the other site where I play Mafia.In post 242, Kit wrote:Oh I got another town read. All votes on Zekrom are bad and you should feel bad.
But yes the sentiment is one I definitely agree with. It's why my vote is on GC at the moment.
Here GC. I even mention active lurking.In post 344, Gooner wrote:Peregrine, are you a Spurs fan?
Now GC. He's been active lurking up to this point. I mean read his ISO. It's all lovely blending into the background, not doing anything to push the town along type scum. The type of player you don't really tend to notice until the end of the game when he's revealed as scum. Fortunately, I have a lot of experience with this type of scum and have grown accustomed to spotting them from a mile away.
Yes I see, I messed up and thought your vote was on Zekrom at that point. Your last posts confused me and I only spotted this error on a re-read.In post 252, Gooner wrote:Slightly creepily that line has become a bit of a catchphrase on the other site where I play Mafia.In post 242, Kit wrote:Oh I got another town read. All votes on Zekrom are bad and you should feel bad.
But yes the sentiment is one I definitely agree with. It's why my vote is on GC at the moment.
Should have put a bet onIn post 476, Gooner wrote:Ugghhh that Liverpool game was brutal. For a few games now we've only turned up in the second half and it cost us today. Oh well we'll still win the League.In post 456, Porochaz wrote:
Gooner is an arsenal fan so is always going to be inherently smug about everything until they lose against Liverpool and Man City overtake them. That said, despite our difference of opinion with game mechanics, I have a slight townread on him, and I can see him doing this but I would like a more firm stance on Zekrom.
.
FTFY.In post 490, RadiantCowbells wrote:Radiant cowbells says fuck allEveryone else says "ignore" lol haha
You are a waste of space, but hell, we can use you as a footstool.In post 492, RadiantCowbells wrote:Well if I'm not posting content, you should probably lynch me for lurking.
In post 490, RadiantCowbells wrote:Radiant cowbells says bla bla blaEveryone else says tl;dr lol haha