Whoops, thought I did.In post 296, anorway wrote:@Yuni: If you think Kublai is definitely scum, why aren't you voting him?
VOTE: Kublai Khan
Whoops, thought I did.In post 296, anorway wrote:@Yuni: If you think Kublai is definitely scum, why aren't you voting him?
Word of advice: generally here at MafiaScum, we don't expect you to play like everyone else. We do, however, generally expect that you develop some nod to site meta.In post 303, Powerofdeath wrote:Lol people are stupid. People need to learn how to play. I am purposely not playing like other people. If you expect me to play like others, lynch me then. It will only hurt you guys even more.
1. Effort is not indicative of alignment, as I am so fond of saying.In post 318, iamausername wrote:not on board with this BoroPhil wagon, he's making more of a genuine effort than p. much anyone else in this game. only reason i see scum bothering when there's this level of lurkery is a partner in danger of lynching, in which case, let's not put the cart before the horse, yeah?
BELI <3
i think you've misinterpreted; i'm not saying scum want to lynch lurkers, i'm saying, with the amount that everybody else is lurking, i wouldn't expect scum to be as much above the average posting level as Boro has been, unless he has a vested interest in driving the lynch away from where it is currently headed.In post 321, goodmorning wrote: 3. Why would Scum want the lurkers lynched today? How would they achieve such a lynch?