In post 424, Guyett wrote:hmm good point.
What if hopkirk is town and has a read on Alex wrong? could you see XLAV + Alex scum team?
Right now, I could see anyone here being scum. Alex for jumping on my hammer, you for vote laying fairly early, Hopkirk for contradicting himself, XLAV for the dumb hammer Day 1.
My scum list in order is: Hopkirk then XLAV then Guyett and Alex tied.
As for teams I could see XLAV and Hopkirk. But really I think most players here are at least semi-experienced, and could be hiding teams well.
In post 423, BipolarChemist wrote:Hopkirk says that he thinks Alexcellent is town. He has also stated that he thinks either Guyett or XLAV is scum, but the both together is out there.
So if he thinks XLAV is mafia, then Guyett has to be town, and because he thinks Alex is town, my only option from that logic is that Hopkirk and XLAV are mafia buddies.
So according to Hopkirk, if XLAV is mafia, so is he.
Actually i'm saying it's YOU and xlav which i've said and you conveniently miss out, or possibly guy and xlav.
“he believes XLAV is scum”
Xlav is not flipping town. If the scumteam is bipolar+guy, alex+guy or alex+bipolar I will eat the top hat in my avatar.
Since when did voting the person who has been a major scumread for most of the game and that you are convinced is scum become scummy?
In post 427, Hopkirk wrote:
Actually i'm saying it's YOU and xlav which i've said and you conveniently miss out, or possibly guy and xlav.
Since when did voting the person who has been a major scumread for most of the game and that you are convinced is scum become scummy?
From my position, what I see you saying is that you and XLAV are scum.
It's not that you are voting for someone you think is scummy, it's that you said not to vote quickly in fear of a quick mafia lock. Then you went and quickly voted for XLAV once he had a vote on him, putting him at L-1.
You really don't get this do you.
It's not a case of quickly meaning "don't vote for a few days" it means "don't vote until you're positive".
I assume it's you and xlav bipol. If not then xlav and guy. Don't even know why you'd think i was saying i'm scum as i've said he has two potential partners (and neither are me).
I think I've seen enough thus far. I've been constantly checking back here all day waiting for someone to jump on my vote. Honestly, I think Hopkirk is decently null town, rather than scum.
What I think is happening is Guyett and XLAV are scum buddies.
Reasons:
1. Guyett seems to have been almost waiting in this thread all day. I believe this is because he is waiting for his partner to lock. Meaning Alex or XLAV is his partner.
2. Immediately today Guyett voted XLAV, yet when Hopkirk voted XLAV, Guyett damn near immediately unvoted. Looks to me like an attempt to stop a quick lynch of his partner.
3. Guyett has consistently gone against XLAV since D2, after XLAV locked KK. On D2, XLAV reached L-1 where none other than Guyett unvoted him damn near immediately after.
4. Today, Guyett is leaning towards an XLAV lynch and then a hopkirk lynch for tomorrow, and he is sweetening up to me. What I see here is Guyett attempting to bus his partner and then get Hopkirk killed to take the win.
I agree that XLAV has been scummy since D1. Hopkirk, I believe you are more than correct, although I wish you'd stop being a dick and just give a list of reasons.
Assuming XLAV is scum guarantees, in my mind, that Guyett is scum.
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
Guyett, you played that very well. Unvoting XLAV at the beginnung of the day damn near sold it for me. Perfect mafia win and dispatching doc and tracker right away, we stood damn near no chance.
BipolarChemist & Alexcellent were endgamed and were Vanilla Townies.
Hopkirk and Guyett both Mafia Goons have won!
No matter how high the stakes, sooner or later you're just gonna have to go with your gut.
And maybe, just maybe, that'll take you right where you were supposed to be.
