I hate blueberries, fuck those guys.
Micro 309: Triplicate Mafia (Game Over)
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
I wish I could vote you :/In post 42, goodmorning wrote:Why did you ask this question? Like, I want to know where your head was at. The reason I phrased that colloquially is because I am not attaching any value judgement to my question. I genuinely want to know.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Reasons why this is a bad idea:In post 49, RedCoyote wrote:To be clear, I am proposing we more or less completely leave out cross group discussion until D2 and let each group kind of decide their own fate. This is because this will automatically put the scum at a disadvantage, I think, by keeping them from working together to influence the other groups. Any thoughts on this?
1) It denies us associative tells. I signed up for this game because it by-default gives me structure groups to work with, which saves me a lot of time in my scum hunting process. Being able to cross-reference the setup's structure groups with those that I'll eventually end up building naturally gives me a lot more ability to be precise early in my scum hunting. I'm also assuming that there are other people who like to scum hunt by associative tells.
2) I don't know most of the other players in this game, which means that I don't trust the scum hunting abilities of the group as a whole. Given that I'm likely dead by day 2, I'd like to have reads across the game in play so that people have that reference point. Additionally, it means that I have more ability to influence getting scum lynched in the other two groups, which increases my chances of surviving to day 2 to wreck the game.
tl;dr, doing this limits my ability to carry, and I don't trust anyone else in this game to carry because I assume incompetent until proven otherwise.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
This is a strange thing to be worried about.In post 59, RedCoyote wrote:
What worries me about this is that it will lead to more accidental votes, I think. I might be a little overcautious, but I'm actually really worried about people voting for players outside their groups and catching heat from the Mod for this.BC 51 wrote:So really I say we treat like a normal day phase, garnering reads and give ourself a list to work from in the teams.
I'm too tired/too writing a paper to discern town/scum/stupid motivation behind this. Backend will probably take care of that for me once I'm less busy.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Math too hard.In post 71, goodmorning wrote:
And now I wish I could vote you.In post 65, BROseidon wrote:2) I don't know most of the other players in this game, which means that I don't trust the scum hunting abilities of the group as a whole. Given that I'm likely dead by day 2, I'd like to have reads across the game in play so that people have that reference point. Additionally, it means that I have more ability to influence getting scum lynched in the other two groups, which increases my chances of surviving to day 2 to wreck the game.
New thought about the voting: If every group lynches Town, that would be a loss. If all groups have a Town vote on Town at the same time, Scum could quickhammer for a win.
So is reading the opening post, apparently-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
I like you.In post 77, Blackfish wrote:First, I found your post 42 odd but wasn't sure if it was just your playstyle or alignment indicative. In particular, you saying "interesting" to BC's townread on me and the "not attaching value judgment" phrase. I like that BRO picked up on it and the way he responded felt genuine. Second, I like his point about associative tells and his confidence in his scumhunting abilities. Tonally, he comes across as somewhat frustrated that most people aren't good scumhunters. It feels very natural and not like fake bravado. Third, him pointing out that RedCoyote was worried about a rather strange thing which mirrored what I thought too. Overall, his posts feel natural and I like his tone and content.
Are you an alt?-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Uh...In post 81, LeMidget wrote:I haven't really looked into page 3 and the latter half of 2 yet so I don't know much about Who but I have a 65.89% townread on you, 18.67% scumread on you, and the other 15.44% in constantly in flux.
You haven't looked at nearly 1/2 of a 4 page game with limited content?
Also, can I get a list of your completed games?-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
gm, our completed games together are LotR and your Large Normal, right?
Which would mean that I don't have much scope on what sorts of behavior are alignment indicative for you, since I, y'know, have barely seen your game.
You're right that me being a dick isn't alignment indicative; I'm just usually a dick ^_^-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Okay, that contextualizes it a fair bit. I think that people being more wary about votes b/c of the way the voting mechanics are central to how day 1 plays out makes it harder to botch here than messing up capitalization in that game was.In post 89, RedCoyote wrote:Well, look it. I can point to a game I've been involved in where townies dropped the ball on obvious rules like the one we have in this game: Polite Mafia, three people modkilled for not following the rules. Oh, by the way, unlike this game where we're given only one mistake before a modkill... in Polite Mafia we were given four mistakes before a modkill. So, yeah, I'll error on the side of player incompetence.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
wtf your join date is over a year ago.In post 87, LeMidget wrote:I've completed one game, but I'm on mobile so linking is hard. It was the "Dry, Bland, and Tasteless" Mini Normal. By caledfwitch or someone along those lines.
Nevermind...-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
I'd place a vote on this, especially given your alt-status, but I can't.In post 80, Blackfish wrote:I am not sure yet. Do you?
Other people in Blackfish's group, pls vote blackfish kthx.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
It's the "I am not sure yet" that made me want to respond with immediate pressure.In post 105, Blackfish wrote:
Why do you find it scummy that I am uncertain about whether there is scum in our group and asked LeMidget about his own reads? Why does my being an alt have anything to do with it?In post 101, BROseidon wrote:
I'd place a vote on this, especially given your alt-status, but I can't.In post 80, Blackfish wrote:I am not sure yet. Do you?
Other people in Blackfish's group, pls vote blackfish kthx.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
I like to pretend that game doesn't exist.In post 110, goodmorning wrote:The Narnia Micro as well, and I think you were a hydra in something else too, I don't recall.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Why would you expect a character change during a game if scum have day talk for, y'know, the entire time?In post 136, LeMidget wrote:Oh, hey. Look what I found. We should look at people's ISOs for character change.
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
I know I'm town.In post 140, Blackfish wrote:I have a moderately strong town read on BRO, a very strong townread on BC, and a moderately strong scum read on Formerfish. This is the group I feel most confident about. BRO, BC, thoughts about that?
I'm biasing town on RC.
null on FF.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Uh...In post 180, TierShift wrote:The group without scum is most likely A since I have two townish reads there.
1) The reason from your perspective should be that it's b/c you're in that group and you know that you're town (If you're town, that is).
2) Given the relatively *little* attention that group A is getting, I'd expect scum to be in there.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman."In post 207, Blackfish wrote:
I don't think my language is "off" or "scummy."In post 205, BROseidon wrote:Blackfish, for someone who's consistently pointing out where people's language in other posts makes them appear scummy, you didn't catch that that was what I latched onto in post 80.
Why is that.
Compare your language with the above statement and tell me if you notice anything.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
It's not that you didn't state #1, but that you ascribed a different reason to it.In post 212, TierShift wrote:I implied 1), why should I explicitly state it? Maybe I'm just not understanding what you're trying to say.
2) is a valid point, gm needs to get in here. Who seems to be steering attention away from A, you think?
Not sure on point #2. It's a question of whether someone is misdirecting conversation off group A, or if someone is misdirecting conversation onto groups B and C. I need to chart some stuff more explicitly to figure this out.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Finals suck :/In post 234, Blackfish wrote:BROseidon is town. Yes, I am let down by him. Yes, I expected a lot better when he said that he was going to carry the town. I didn't expect him to suspect me which is anal-shit because I am obvtown. I didn't expect him to attack me based on language. Yes, it is dumb. You know the feeling when you go out with someone for a first time with knowledge that they work for the FBI? Later on over dinner, you learn that they are a janitor? and when you felt let down, you complain "but you said you work for the FBI, waah, waahh." And then he responds that he is the janitor for the FBI. BROseidon is town.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
read 231In post 229, goodmorning wrote:Actually, being real about it for a second, I'm not seeing the same kind of distancing from Blackfish as from Clinton.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
"I am not sure yet"In post 240, Blackfish wrote:
Yeah, what the hell is this Mr. BROseidon? You wanna know the difference?In post 213, BROseidon wrote:
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman."In post 207, Blackfish wrote:
I don't think my language is "off" or "scummy."In post 205, BROseidon wrote:Blackfish, for someone who's consistently pointing out where people's language in other posts makes them appear scummy, you didn't catch that that was what I latched onto in post 80.
Why is that.
Compare your language with the above statement and tell me if you notice anything.
Clinton didn't use a contraction. "I did not have"
I didn't use a contraction. "I don't think"
I didn't say "I did not think"
So you should actually be townreading me for this.
"I'm not sure"
One of those is the uncontracted form. The other is the one you used.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
lol, it means I had two papers do write last week that make me pull a double all-nighter, plus the 8am exam that I should be studying for write now (Doing an entire term's worth of reading in a single night is fun).In post 266, Blackfish wrote:
How does finals sucking explain you sucking? I may have changed my mind on you/Fish. Your reads are stupidly demarcated. The only person you are sure of is scum is me? You are null on Formerfish? Oh, give me a fucking seal to eat. You are unbelievable. Points towards you being scum.In post 257, BROseidon wrote:
Finals suck :/In post 234, Blackfish wrote:BROseidon is town. Yes, I am let down by him. Yes, I expected a lot better when he said that he was going to carry the town. I didn't expect him to suspect me which is anal-shit because I am obvtown. I didn't expect him to attack me based on language. Yes, it is dumb. You know the feeling when you go out with someone for a first time with knowledge that they work for the FBI? Later on over dinner, you learn that they are a janitor? and when you felt let down, you complain "but you said you work for the FBI, waah, waahh." And then he responds that he is the janitor for the FBI. BROseidon is town.
Time constraints are a thing that exist. I have them right now.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
I find the fact that you overemphasized and increased formality in your speech scummy as.In post 267, Blackfish wrote:
Yes, I said I was town. Do you find it scummy?In post 258, BROseidon wrote:
read 231In post 229, goodmorning wrote:Actually, being real about it for a second, I'm not seeing the same kind of distancing from Blackfish as from Clinton.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
See the thing about finals.In post 274, goodmorning wrote:Because he's not acting like he does when he's Town. Generally, I'd expect TownBro to be kicking it up one side and down the other.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
The fact that he made the same tell?In post 274, goodmorning wrote:I don't really know what you're going for here.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
I think Blackfish is pretending to be a me-alt. I can't think of any other player who spam-posts to this degree. Combine that with the ad homs...In post 289, Formerfish wrote:Why are you spamming the thread by breaking one post apart into 3 separate replies?-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 293, Blackfish wrote:
Grow a thicker skin.In post 285, BipolarChemist wrote:BF: I called you a dick and an asshole after you called people 'actual idiots'. That's such a dickish thing to say. The point where players want you out of a game for being an annoying asshole should really tell you something. No these aren't pertinent points, I just am very annoyed by you.
THIS.
IS.
MAFIA.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
What do you find "nebulous" about my posting? I think I'm being plenty clear.In post 310, goodmorning wrote:I'm willing to cut you some slack for that, but I still don't like the nebulous nature of a lot of your posting.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
It's fine b/c my group's probably the one without scum, and I'm one of the best players at not spiraling out of control from paranoia.In post 311, RedCoyote wrote:This is actually a pretty good point and another reason why we probably shouldn't have allowed cross-group scumhunting.
Also your read on me is shit and you should probably fix that.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
6.5/10In post 315, Formerfish wrote:I'm calling a blackfish/redcoyote scum team. Only because of their names though.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Yes, me saying "lynch this person in that group" is obvious throwaway suspicion.In post 322, RedCoyote wrote:He's the only one that's left in your group. I'm okay with Formerfish for right now. Yeah, I've read your posts. A whole lot of nothing. Surprise, surprise that you're ready to excuse that. I think you and Blackfish make more sense as partners than anyone else though. You two are like two peas in a pod, each throwing token, throwaway suspicions at the other. I'd also go Blackfish and goodmorning, but that seems significantly less likely.
Wait...-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
I'll give you that number three is a bit vague. Any particular phrasing things you want me to go over.In post 323, goodmorning wrote:The posts that aren't about theory tend to be pretty vague:
"this is a strange thing to be worried about"
"i'd vote this"
"phrasing is off"
The answer's probably "lack of using a contraction," since I don't remember anyone hedging this game, and those are the 2 liar tells that I catch most frequently.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
BpC/Midget/Tier feel like universal town reads right now.In post 331, goodmorning wrote:Generally: Is there a person in each group that we can generally agree is Town? I feel it might be helpful for us to pare down our lynchpools further but maybe that would be too open to Scum influence?-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
2/3 of the way through the day phase is "we're running close to deadline?"In post 335, RedCoyote wrote:Alright, lady and gentlemen, we're running up on the deadline here. I think I want to quote one of the Mod's game rules for emphasis:
What are you smoking, or if you're scum what are you gunning at...-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Gladly.In post 335, RedCoyote wrote:It doesn't really matter what you say now since you have no say in the matter, but I'd bet dollars to doughnuts you wouldn't be saying the same stuff if you two were both alive come tomorrow. You can hold me to that too.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
But you need to lynch one of the two and Tier is obvtown so...In post 350, goodmorning wrote:RC and I are two different people with two different playstyles.
I am also not convinced he's Scum.
Why the fuck are you being so reserved here?-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Such sympathying.In post 351, RedCoyote wrote:I sympathize, goodmorning. I appreciate you not stooping to Blackfish's browbeating and feeling compelled to vote on the basis of his bullying. That said, I recognize that it's practically in your best interests to cross vote me at some point (unless your prepared to try and sell me on Tierscum, which I haven't picked up on at all).
Very town.
Wait...
Question is whether RC is going for the GM lynch, trying to distance from his buddy while accepting his inevitable lynch, or some combo thereof.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Oh lol.In post 369, Blackfish wrote:
The scumteam isn't me and Coyote, you humongous pile of whale blubber. It is you and Coyote.In post 366, BROseidon wrote:
Such sympathying.In post 351, RedCoyote wrote:I sympathize, goodmorning. I appreciate you not stooping to Blackfish's browbeating and feeling compelled to vote on the basis of his bullying. That said, I recognize that it's practically in your best interests to cross vote me at some point (unless your prepared to try and sell me on Tierscum, which I haven't picked up on at all).
Very town.
Wait...
Question is whether RC is going for the GM lynch, trying to distance from his buddy while accepting his inevitable lynch, or some combo thereof.
Is the scum team you and GM?-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
I'm always fine with being lynched if I'm a VT and think the rest of the town can close out the game w/o me. Probably why my mislynch rate is as high as it is...In post 373, BipolarChemist wrote:The BRO, BF, Red agreeance there bothers me, it seems like BF and Red are just following along with BRO's being fine with being lynched. Like sheep or something-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
-
-
BROseidon
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Don't like.In post 59, RedCoyote wrote:
What worries me about this is that it will lead to more accidental votes, I think. I might be a little overcautious, but I'mBC 51 wrote:So really I say we treat like a normal day phase, garnering reads and give ourself a list to work from in the teams.actually reallyworried about people voting for players outside their groups and catching heat from the Mod for this.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Leaving this here:
In post 64, BROseidon wrote:
I wish I could vote you :/In post 42, goodmorning wrote:Why did you ask this question? Like, I want to know where your head was at. The reason I phrased that colloquially is because I am not attaching any value judgement to my question. I genuinely want to know.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Maybe a townslip?In post 71, goodmorning wrote:
And now I wish I could vote you.In post 65, BROseidon wrote:2) I don't know most of the other players in this game, which means that I don't trust the scum hunting abilities of the group as a whole. Given that I'm likely dead by day 2, I'd like to have reads across the game in play so that people have that reference point. Additionally, it means that I have more ability to influence getting scum lynched in the other two groups, which increases my chances of surviving to day 2 to wreck the game.
New thought about the voting: If every group lynches Town, that would be a loss. If all groups have a Town vote on Town at the same time, Scum could quickhammer for a win.-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
bad list is bad.In post 131, Who wrote:My reads:
RedCoyote - Null
TierShift - town
LeMidget - town
BROseidon - null
BipolarChemist - null
goodmorning - town
Blackfish - scum
Formerfish - null
Also liking BC a lot less on reread :/-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
-