Newbie 1484 (Day Two)

Thesoctorisin · Post Post #175 (ISO) » Sat Mar 15, 2014 2:58 pm

So you think that he is scum also?

Also what does l-1 mean? Can I get lynched before the day is even up?

Thesoctorisin · Post Post #176 (ISO) » Sat Mar 15, 2014 3:03 pm

Awwwww my first ever mafia game and I'm most likely going to get lynched.

It is my fault though as I voted on someone who already had votes and then said that I wasn't bandwagoning

catboi · Post Post #177 (ISO) » Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:09 pm

In post 162, Hopkirk wrote:And i caught you early (though i have had second thoughts at times but you keep making yourself look bad again).

this is a monster of a sentence

I'm not really moved by anything soctor says

Thesoctorisin · Post Post #178 (ISO) » Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:55 pm

I wasn't trying to move anybody I'm just explaining why I'm OK with being lynched. I screwed my chances of living pretty bad.

Bulbazak · Post Post #179 (ISO) » Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:56 pm

In post 172, I Love Fairies wrote:I'm not even going to bother responding to Bulba at this point. His paraphrasing and taking parts of statements that I've made to create a different, easier argument to defend against. He's not reading my posts and he's trying to make me look scummy by responding to only fragments of a single argument. His posts are based around making himself look more like town and making others look more like scum rather than actually trying to find scum.

How am I paraphrasing? I'm addressing you pretty directly. Would you rather me quote whole posts, where most of it does not pertain to what I'm responding to? Or would you rather me be direct and to the point? The mere fact that I know what I'm responding to, and I am responding to your arguments, shows that I am reading what you are saying. Why don't you want to interact with me? That's the very basis of scumhunting.

In post 174, JarJarDrinks wrote:When I asked bulb about you his one word response was "scum". Yet he hasn't voted for you.

I'd rather vote my other scumread: Hopkirk. Bet you didn't know you could have more than one, huh?

In post 174, JarJarDrinks wrote: The fact that you're a vote from being hammered and he isn't discussing it @ all is odd.

Last I checked, he was at L-2

In post 175, Thesoctorisin wrote: Also what does l-1 mean? Can I get lynched before the day is even up?

If a majority is reached before deadline, then the day automatically ends.

I Love Fairies · Post Post #180 (ISO) » Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:15 pm

Bulba, you cut a sentence in half, changed the meaning completely, and then responded to it.

Soctor is indeed at L-1. The three votes counted in the vote count provided by the mod, and Hopkirk's vote.

Bulbazak · Post Post #181 (ISO) » Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:20 pm

In post 180, I Love Fairies wrote: Bulba, you cut a sentence in half, changed the meaning completely, and then responded to it.

And I responded to both parts, because there were 2 inherent arguments: Burden of Proficiency and "Bulba is only responding to posts that talk about him.", which is untrue.

In post 180, I Love Fairies wrote: Soctor is indeed at L-1. The three votes counted in the vote count provided by the mod, and Hopkirk's vote.

Hopkirk unvoted.

I Love Fairies · Post Post #182 (ISO) » Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:31 pm

I don't think you understand how English works. They were not two independent clauses as proven by the inclusion of the coordinating conjunction 'yet' in my sentence. The clause following yet is a subordinate clause, in this case meaning that the information presenting in the first clause is altered by the second. Perhaps I should have structured my sentence using a more restrictive conjunction to prevent this issue. I'm of the opinion that you decided my argument would have been easier to deflect if you altered my argument.

While we're at it, could you link the post where Hopkirk unvoted? I could have sworn I saw him just recently change his vote to Soctor and leave it on Soctor.

I Love Fairies · Post Post #183 (ISO) » Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:38 pm

If you'd prefer, I'll just rephrase my argument.

Even though you are the most experienced player, and thus, the player who should be able to provide the most information, you choose not to provide information unless it's directly related to you.

Hopkirk · Post Post #184 (ISO) » Sat Mar 15, 2014 10:59 pm

In post 176, Thesoctorisin wrote:Awwwww my first ever mafia game and I'm most likely going to get lynched.

It is my fault though as I voted on someone who already had votes and then said that I wasn't bandwagoning

Ateateate

Claim now please.

Docthorr · Post Post #185 (ISO) » Sun Mar 16, 2014 1:52 am

busy, busy, busy
I really need to make time to sit down and read.
Don't have it right now though.

Thesoctor made a mistake.
Bulba and Hop are confusing as hell.

Thesoctorisin · Post Post #186 (ISO) » Sun Mar 16, 2014 3:15 am

Hopkirk wrote:
In post 176, Thesoctorisin wrote:Awwwww my first ever mafia game and I'm most likely going to get lynched.

It is my fault though as I voted on someone who already had votes and then said that I wasn't bandwagoning
Ateateate

Claim now please.

First of all what in the world does "ateateate" mean and when you say claim you want me to say my role?

Hopkirk · Post Post #187 (ISO) » Sun Mar 16, 2014 4:47 am

Ate= appeal to emotion.

You claim because you're going to be lynched. If you're on l-1 you claim because... we want to avoid lynching power roles like cop or bulletproofs.
So claim now.

Thesoctorisin · Post Post #188 (ISO) » Sun Mar 16, 2014 7:50 am

Oh! I'm just a VT.

Hopkirk · Post Post #189 (ISO) » Sun Mar 16, 2014 10:34 am

Vote Soctor

And that's 5/you're dead.
Bye.

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #190 (ISO) » Sun Mar 16, 2014 1:55 pm

In post 189, Hopkirk wrote:
Vote Soctor

And that's 5/you're dead.
Bye.

As far as I can tell thats only 4 since ur already voting for him.

catboi · Post Post #191 (ISO) » Sun Mar 16, 2014 3:24 pm

did you have to ruin it?

Number_0ne · Post Post #192 (ISO) » Sun Mar 16, 2014 3:50 pm

UNVOTE:

I'm just feeling really suspicious of this lynch right now. To me, it's seeming like thesoctor is either a very good mafia or an inexperienced town.

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #193 (ISO) » Sun Mar 16, 2014 4:39 pm

In post 192, Number_0ne wrote:very good mafia

You think very good mafia would be about to be getting lynched day 1?

Robocopter87 · Post Post #194 (ISO) » Sun Mar 16, 2014 4:56 pm

--:Vote Count:--

Thesoctorisin [ 3 ] JarJarDrinks, catboi, Hopkirk
Docthorr [ 0 ]
LessThanOriginal [ 1 ] Docthorr
JarJarDrinks [ 0 ]
I Love Fairies [ 0 ]
Number_0ne [ 0 ]
Hopkirk [ 2 ] Bulbazak, Thesoctorisin
catboi [ 0 ]
Bulbazak [ 1 ] I Love Fairies

Not Voting

: LessThanOriginal, Number_0ne

Amount To Lynch

: With 9 alive it is 5 to lynch

Deadline

: 11:59PM of March 21st EST.

I Love Fairies · Post Post #195 (ISO) » Sun Mar 16, 2014 7:06 pm

In post 189, Hopkirk wrote:
Vote Soctor

And that's 5/you're dead.
Bye.

This is super scummy given that discussion is still prevalent.

Hopkirk · Post Post #196 (ISO) » Sun Mar 16, 2014 8:57 pm

In post 195, I Love Fairies wrote:
In post 189, Hopkirk wrote:
Vote Soctor

And that's 5/you're dead.
Bye.
This is super scummy given that discussion is still prevalent.

After a votecount... you don't notice it's a fake hammer how?

Explain why you think a fake hammer is scummy.

And thanks to the person who ruined it right away

Number_0ne · Post Post #197 (ISO) » Sun Mar 16, 2014 11:04 pm

In post 193, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 192, Number_0ne wrote:very good mafia
You think very good mafia would be about to be getting lynched day 1?

No. That's part of the reason why I unvoted.

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #198 (ISO) » Mon Mar 17, 2014 1:14 am

In post 197, Number_0ne wrote:
In post 193, JarJarDrinks wrote:
In post 192, Number_0ne wrote:very good mafia
You think very good mafia would be about to be getting lynched day 1?
No. That's part of the reason why I unvoted.

Then I don't understand what you're saying. Why can't he be inexperienced mafia? I have no idea why you unvoted.

In post 192, Number_0ne wrote:UNVOTE:

I'm just feeling really suspicious of this lynch right now.

What exactly are you suspicious about?

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #199 (ISO) » Mon Mar 17, 2014 2:27 am

In post 196, Hopkirk wrote:
In post 195, I Love Fairies wrote:
In post 189, Hopkirk wrote:
Vote Soctor

And that's 5/you're dead.
Bye.
This is super scummy given that discussion is still prevalent.
After a votecount... you don't notice it's a fake hammer how?

Explain why you think a fake hammer is scummy.

And thanks to the person who ruined it right away

I don't understand. What is a fake hammer supposed to accomplish?