Stopping at around page 73.
1.)
I still haven't actually gotten to the Albert B. Rampage lynch itself, but my general impressions of the scum strategy around that time of the game would be something like so:
Day One ended with a Slandaar lynch with Slandaar essentially trying to pull Albert B. Rampage down with him in the end. Albert B. Rampage and his scumpartners would naturally expect Albert B. Rampage to come under some degree of attack the following day; if there was a plan it was probably to "play it by ear but be ready to bus." I believe there were a few players who were defending / enabling Albert B. Rampage on Day One who cut him considerably less slack on Day Two. I am not inclined to give anybody Townpoints for changing their mind on him.
2.)
I actually find it very interesting that Chevre (my predecessor) tried a nightkill analysis on the N1 Yessiree kill, and what is particularly amusing is his conclusion that Albert B. Rampage was probably Town because, in essence, it would be too obvious for him to kill Yessiree. Very few people seemed to weigh in on the analysis at all save for PF Tony, who actually decided that based on the evidence to vote Albert B. Rampage.
That
is the type of thing that warrants Townpoints. I will want to return to posts around that time because scum would obviously rather leave that particular hornet's nest alone, so anybody who engaged with Chevre at that point of the game was likely to be doing so in good faith.
3.)
In the last few pages of my read (pages 70-73?) I am becoming
increasingly
suspicious of RainbowDash. She has a thing for "loyalty" and I have to think that is a likely reason she was so vehemently pushing the kabooooom lynch over the Albert B. Rampage lynch. It practically looked like she was avoiding saying the name Albert B. Rampage (and this is likely not
literally
true) in her posts in an effort to put the focus on kabooooom. Granted I replaced into the game with the context that Albert B. Rampage is scum, but RainbowDash's posting still feels highly unnatural during that stage of the game.
4.)
Sotty7, could you explain again why you changed your mind on Albert B. Rampage.
5.)
In post 1580, inHimshallibe wrote: In post 1578, Sotty7 wrote:Vote: ABR
This guy really needs to die.
Bulb is also probably scum at this point. His whole interaction with fonz/Tebow on day one was really off. Fonz pours the heat on him and at one point Bulb makes a comment about how he was barely paying attention to him when all he had done for posts before was reply in their little back and forth. Their whole interaction just really struck me as off. Throw on his weak suspicion of emo that he just keeps falling back on and we have scum.
Noted for later.
Votes one way, pushes a case the other.
inHimshallibe, has this note to yourself resulted in anything?
6.)
bulbazak's early comments about Mountainous (and this set-up in particular) and then later presuming the game had four scum felt very off, and although the subject was explored by somebody (I think Nero Cain logged in under a different account to address it), I will want to return to that at some point. Up until that comment I had actually had a weak Townread on bulbazak.
