If either of innocent or DDD is dead when day 2 starts, I will look back at this discussion and ponder upon it.In post 74, PrivateI wrote:I am feeling as though it has played out...what result are you expecting to see?In post 71, Billi bilaði wrote:It will be informative to see how this all plays out.
In post 42, Randomnamechange wrote:I don't like the way that innocent seems to be trying to gain towncred...
Vote Innocent
Please don't put him at L-1 because someone might not notice and waste 12 days of discussion.
So you say that your vote was random but it looks like you were serious about you reason.In post 66, Randomnamechange wrote:RVS mate. It was a little odd, so I put pressure on too see what happened.
I think we are just arguing over a preference of playstyles. I would rather see them speak their mind about who and why they think someone is scum rather than them aggressively defend themselves.In post 67, Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:Why on Earth would you think survivalism is dubious? I have one piece of information available to me on day one, that I'm town and if I get lynched then I haven't made use of that information because I've allowed a town player to get lynched. I know IV is an SE but I consider the ability to survive the most useful ability of any new town player because very rarely does anyone have a good feel for scumhunting so simply keeping oneself alive and out of the lynch pool is extremely valuable.In post 65, jklash12 wrote:Can any of the three votes on IV please explain your vote because all the votes on IV came before what I thought was a little fishy from IV?
Well it depends if he ends up getting replaced this may be more of a not logging on situation than lurking.In post 80, Billi bilaði wrote:I'll put my vote into play before the BB4 on it expires. Lurking is a good enough reason for the first casting.
So, dawn_to_dust, why are you forced to vote to stay alive?
VOTE: dawn_to_dusk
Irrelevant, IV's voters have been noted since they were trying to get that bandwagon startedIn post 73, PrivateI wrote:Zephyr, there has officially been a votecount posted, and you never gave us your thoughts. What do you think of InnocentVillager?In post 52, Zephyrus wrote:I think the vote count on Inovil is 3 or 4... gonna wait till we get a mod count since Im lazy
OK. Thanx. Didn't know the difference. Anyways, this is probably not a permavote.In post 81, jklash12 wrote:Well it depends if he ends up getting replaced this may be more of a not logging on situation than lurking.In post 80, Billi bilaði wrote:I'll put my vote into play before the BB4 on it expires. Lurking is a good enough reason for the first casting.
So, dawn_to_dust, why are you forced to vote to stay alive?
VOTE: dawn_to_dusk
Am I understanding correctly that you think your thoughts on innocent are irrelevant for us because you don't agree with the votes he got?In post 82, Zephyrus wrote:Irrelevant, IV's voters have been noted since they were trying to get that bandwagon startedIn post 73, PrivateI wrote:Zephyr, there has officially been a votecount posted, and you never gave us your thoughts. What do you think of InnocentVillager?In post 52, Zephyrus wrote:I think the vote count on Inovil is 3 or 4... gonna wait till we get a mod count since Im lazy
What little I've read in newbie games on this site, is that all experienced players talk against no lynch days since it only benefits the mafia.In post 83, Zephyrus wrote:Could we do a day 1 no lynch by any chance?
mainly because i misread the rules. im used to rules on other sites saying that if you dont vote for 2 days, you will be modkilled. but since the prodding thing is here, that seems unnecessary.Billi bilaði wrote:I'll put my vote into play before the BB4 on it expires. Lurking is a good enough reason for the first casting.
So, dawn_to_dust, why are you forced to vote to stay alive?
VOTE: dawn_to_dusk
Survivalism short of lying is fine, it's just not a scumtell. And of course I want to force my opinion on the town, I want it so that when I want to push my opinion that there are no dissenting opinions.In post 71, Billi bilaði wrote:But my feel was that you claimed all survivalism to be good regardless of content.
But I also note that you say now (and have said before, I believe) that the actions in question don't make him mafia in your book. Having said that, it looks to me that you want to force that opinion on the rest of us.
We could, it's an awful idea though because it puts the numbers in scum's favor.In post 83, Zephyrus wrote:Could we do a day 1 no lynch by any chance?
You shouldn't shoot to have a scramble lynch but it will tell you something and it certainly tells you more than a no lynch does.In post 85, Billi bilaði wrote:But what are the general thoughts on no lynch over a scramble at deadline to get anylynch? Are quicky-lynch-bandwagons informative?
(I've never played a game where no-lynch was a possibility.)
You can go first.In post 89, Randomnamechange wrote:...Okay please can everyone give at least one read?
This seems as scummy as hell. You are basically saying you want us to follow you blindly into whatever you say. Give us one reason why we should do this a few days into Day 1, where you haven't even done anything particularly scummy?In post 88, Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:
Survivalism short of lying is fine, it's just not a scumtell. And of course I want to force my opinion on the town, I want it so that when I want to push my opinion that there are no dissenting opinions.
No reasoning. Why?
Civi = civilian. Sorry, I'm not really used to mafia here quite yet.In post 87, Billi bilaði wrote:-snip-What does "civi" mean? (First time google doesn't help me with abbreviations here)-snip-
