Confirmation bias breeds in all circumstances. (but my playstyle does probably need to be updated in avoiding that myself).In post 293, Remilia Scarlet wrote: There are really good reasons to ENSURE we get claims before a lynch, and it was a combination of that and wanting more interactions in general (this was kinda pre-'all my townreads are telling me I'm wrong', so it wasn't as much for that at that point)
But I'm trying to constantly re-evaluate. Not doing this breeds confirmation bias.
-b
I still stand by getting off a wagon yet still pushing will mean that you don't actually care, but then it is probably true that it's something I don't get and therefore assume scum motivation.
I'm fairly sure you're meant to do that the whole game, not just when someone is on L-1.In post 296, Tanzklaue wrote:L-1 is normally the point where you start talking and answering questions.
That doesn't change that you unvoted due to wanting to waste more time in the day. (actually why does scum want that? why does town want that? who cares?)In post 297, InsidiousLemons wrote:CD, I believe I am making it quite clear that I am a part of your wagon, if not in vote. Please feel free to divine whatever you would from a Cheery Dog town/scumflip in my favour or against. Also the whole "nobody wants a cheery lynch" was admittedly my fault. I misread the votecount and thought he only had 1 vote on him. However, both CD and SV are equally scummy in my mind now and so I'm going to keep my vote on SV simply because he's closer to being lynched.