I care. I happen to agree that you have no case if you are willing to accept that Pidgey simply mixed metaphors as that changes the entire context of those two posts and invalidates your claim.
Let me show you...
You obviously think Pidgey meant "mudslinging" per
post 127 where you say "Would you say
displaced is attempting to smear
mozamis or mozamis' read on me?"
Pidgey's
post 136, in retrospect, appears to be a clarification that supports the theory that he misspoke and meant "seeing what sticks" when he says "i feel that going out of his way to just mentiona
point anout something without really commiting to a read
was what made me weary of displaced"
The reason I use the term "mudslinging" above is because that's how displaced characterized the statement in
post 214 ["How is that post mudslinging? How is mudslinging non committal?"], which you refer to as justification for your vote in
post 229 ["pay attention to displaced - he caught all of the problems with Pidgey's posts that I was picking at"].
Post 258 appears to be your summary of the situation and in this post you point out that Pidgey's post 136 [quoted above] "is a dramatic change in pidgey's reason to vote for displaced" from
post 125 where Pidgey says "Displaced looks scummy with his last post since that seems like a little "throw some dirt and see if it sticks." Do you see how if you replace "throw some dirt and see if it sticks" with "throwing crap against the wall and seeing what sticks" [per our recent clarification] is
entirely
in line with what he stated in post 136? And if you accept that, then the "back pedaling" you refer to in
post 363 is also invalidated.
The last point you have in play is from
post 433 "Could you look me in the eye and state that displaced's post held scummy intent?" I happen to agree that I find nothing scummy about
post 121 and asked Pidgey the following " I happen to agree with displaced on that point, actually. Saying that banter "feels relaxed" as an explanation for a Town read is pretty weak. Do you disagree?" in
post 412. Pidgey's response was "yes, it felt to me as if he wanted to point something and see if others would think is scummy" in
post 414.
Essentially your only remaining point, then, is that you disagree with Pidgey's assessment of Displaced's post 121. And that's really nothing at all. So... what else have you got?
Also, what was the purpose behind your
unofficial vote count?
