The lie detector basically says if the person that has provided a statement is telling the truth or lying. And that evidence comes from the moderator of the game. Not sure why guyett didn't reveal the answer.
The past couple of posts is setting alarm bells ringing. So no messing around, mind is made up.
Voyeur is a reverse watcher. The voyeur learns what actions were performed TO the target but not who performed them (watcher sees who but not what).
You claim that Aronis is lying because you targeted him and got no result. So because no one targeted HIM for an action, he's lying about using his...? lol...
You've been caught in a lie and keep trying to backpedal out of it. I actually find it kind of amusing.
Voyeur is a reverse watcher. The voyeur learns what actions were performed TO the target but not who performed them (watcher sees who but not what).
You claim that Aronis is lying because you targeted him and got no result. So because no one targeted HIM for an action, he's lying about using his...? lol...
You've been caught in a lie and keep trying to backpedal out of it. I actually find it kind of amusing.
No, he seems to be claiming he's blocked. Which he wasn't. But if he used his action in a wrong manner on eek's post, it might also not have worked. Eek, are you positive you know how a lie detector works?
What he said was that the mod wouldn't answer him. Lie detectors need to choose a valid post to lie detect. He did not and therefore the mod said he couldn't answer it.
Secondly, if he was JAILKEPT, neither of you would receive a result.
Not sure if you guys have Easter weekend over there but that's exactly what we're at here so that's why my participation
This weekend has been so poor as I had family commitments Friday and the football yesterday. I'm going to catch up today and will have a proper read this morning.
Although I see we're one away from lynching Tier. If there is a definite reason I should hammer him I'd be more than happy to oblige if someone can out forward a strong argument in the next few hours. Apart from that give me 12 hours to catch up on all the goings on and I'll be back...
Does that explain why there was a no lynch, because the highest voted person gets lynched when deadline hits, and Hannah was the higest voted come deadline?
I'm wondering if hannah's role could be real. Like, it's so OP as either alignment. And Eek, how does it sound like a town role to you?
Hannah, why didn't you claim yesterday?
Like, it's so OP as either alignment. And Eek, how does it sound like a town role to you?
Hannah, why didn't you claim yesterday?
Why aren't we lynching aronis?
Why
I'm 99% she is telling the truth.
Guyett wrote:* This is the only way to achieve a "No Lynch" - regular lynching is achieved through plurality. (The first one with the most votes at deadline is lynched.)
Hannah at the time of the deadline, was the one with the most votes, and nobody was lynched. Therefore backs up her role, lynchproof townie.
In post 621, TierShift wrote:I'm wondering if hannah's role could be real. Like, it's so OP as either alignment. And Eek, how does it sound like a town role to you?
Hannahs role I am 99% sure is the truth. Guyett mentions in his first post:
* This is the only way to achieve a "No Lynch" - regular lynching is achieved through plurality. (The first one with the most votes at deadline is lynched.
Hannah at the time of the 1st deadline was the one with the most votes, which resulted in no lynch, proving that she is the lynchproof townie.