Nikanor claims a day cop on d1 of a normal game, and you're honestly asking if it's real? Come on! You only asked that to look townie and push Nikanor on it if he rightly refused to answer such a stupid question. It was a cheap push, and one which you never would have done as town.In post 2603, Yates wrote: 1. Re: Nikanor - Why would I question a claim? Is this something I actually have to answer?
Same as above. Marquis's claim was obviously RVS BS. Taking it seriously and pushing it as scummy kept you from doing any actual scumhunting.In post 2603, Yates wrote: 2. Re: Marq - Same as above
In post 2603, Yates wrote:
3. Re: Softclaim - "And watch him say he never was trying to claim that [mason]" - I was never was trying to claim that. I was intimating that I know who the mason is and that it isn't Marquis.
In post 2147, Yates wrote:Bottom line:
- I'm accusing Marquis of fake claiming mason.
- I'm saying I can prove it *without* the REAL mason needing to counter.
- I'm saying that it's scummy to fake claim mason.
- I'm trying to make her hard claim something she's *trying* to soft claim in order to remove wiggle room.
PE: Then WTF is up with that quote that - btw - YOU requoted after the mason flip? Huh??
BULL.In post 2165, Yates wrote:Well then you better get explaining because as far as I'm concerned Marq isn't getting lynched as long as I'm alive.In post 2159, DeathNote wrote:We are lynching between Yates and Marq today and I am starting to lean Yates.And my lynch won't go through either.So you're going to be stuck between a rock and a hard place.
In post 2175, Yates wrote:In due time.In post 2166, Untrod Tripod wrote:your lynch won't go through? do tell.
In the mean time, why are YOU voting Yates? I'm not going to let you pretend it's because you think I was trying to out the mason. It's clear I was role fishing - but only Marquis and Marquis knows why so...???
FREAKING.In post 2180, Yates wrote:Alright - I'm going to bed. I expect to see cases when I wake up. And you're going to want me to claim before you do something terrible so don't do something terrible while I'm sleeping.
CRAP.In post 2196, Yates wrote:Ha! Touché. How long have you been walking around with THAT in your back pocket?In post 2194, serrapaladin wrote:Aw hell naw.
See the difference? In that game, I hinted at having a PR. Ironically, that's why I initially thought Marquis was scummy here. I didn't say "my lynch won't go through" like I did last night. My concern last night was getting run up so quickly without so much as a case. If you were Town, I would have expected you to say something yourself given the complete lack of information my mislynch would have given you.In post 1374, Yates wrote:I am so confident on Mhork right nowI'm targeting Ms M tonight. This information is important.
Also, it's not like this would be the first time I made a bold prediction like that as Town, would it?Spoiler:
Bottom line: you are rolefishing me. I'm not going to take the bait. If your scum-padres want to know my role you will have to get them to vote me up to L-1 or shoot me tonight.
NO. NO. NO. This is not town thinking at all. You do not distance from your mason partner. There is no need to distance from your mason partner, as you want that connection to be seen. This is scum thinking, because scum want to distance so that the connection CAN NOT be seen. For masons, you don't want to make it obvious, but you don't want to distance. Calling your mason partner scum or "suspecting" them of being scum is bad play.In post 2603, Yates wrote:
I will admit that if I were a mason with Poro, something like that FoS you pointed out [contrary to your purported opinion, btw] would be TOTALLY in line with me distancing from my mason buddy in order to make the two of us harder to figure out in the event one of us got killed.
Also, for someone trying to argue that you weren't setting yourself up for a mason claim, you are beginning to set yourself up for a mason claim here by trying to convince us that Poro could have absolutely been masons with you and have been "distancing" from you:
You can't have it both ways, scumbag.In post 2603, Yates wrote: Of course, we'd also work out a way to verify in the event one of us needed to claim later. This is something I expect to see if/when the real mason is forced to claim.
Except I ALWAYS read the full game when I replace in. I think I even stated upon replacing in that I would be reading the game. That comment by you was a cheap shot. As for ISOs, they would tell me nothing, as I would have no context to put them in, and the best context for the game actually comes from having read it. I think it's too much to try to imply that the slot as a whole is useless (most likely pushing for a PL here) based on my not being caught up on a 100+ page game in 2 days (and not a week, like you're claiming was the case).In post 2603, Yates wrote: 5. Re: my "focus" on your slot yesterday - this is the sum total of my laser focus on your slot:No one expects you to read the whole game. I *would* expect you to at least look at the deadline wagons, though. Doesn't seem like a stretch to expect - oh - ANYTHING after a full week.In post 2463, Yates wrote:Re: RC slot - Bulba is the new RC and has two content promise posts. I think the slot is broken.
Kagami posted because he had to, due to his being scum and in danger of being lynched. Nacho only ISO'd NS, saw that he was scum (Nacho is one of the few I'd trust to read NS like that.), and then asked that he be lynched. Given how little he actually posted, I'd say he wasn't that caught up either.In post 2603, Yates wrote: Somehow Kagami and Nacho managed to post content...
I'd say that's not surprising, seeing as how my predecessor couldn't keep up and had to be replaced. What is your point?In post 2603, Yates wrote: 6. Re: lack of activity from your slot - You know how many scum wagons your slot has been on? It shouldn't take too long to count to zero.
You jumped on when the wagons were gaining momentum and were not instrumental in getting either lynched. Don't you dare try to get towncred from that.In post 2603, Yates wrote: Conversely, I killed the Mafia RB and the Mafia Encryptor.
Again, your actual contribution to the scum lynches were minimal, so you trying to use that as a reason to exalt your points, while discrediting mine, holds no water.In post 2603, Yates wrote: So for a non-contributing slot to wonder why I - as someone that has contributed reads, advanced the game, killed scum, and actually scum hunted contrary to your bs accusation - would have the gall to call your slot "broken" is laughable.
Given that all 3 players were liabilities, were likely to be lynched given the momentum on their wagons, and the fact that being on the wagon might net you towncred, absolutely I believe you'd bus another PR. Being on the wagon is not the same as actively pushing the wagon, even when it would not be beneficial to do so at that given moment.In post 2621, Yates wrote:What's bothering me...
Bulba? Seriously? You said this???And then ignored looking at where my slot was on each of those wagons??In post 2594, Bulbazak wrote:Nachomamma8: I want to believe town, mainly because I have a hard time thinking he'd replace into a scum slot with 2 buddies down, and then bus another one, especially when Kagami could have turned that slot around. However, this is Nacho, and I don't want to rush into a town read prematurely.
So, you don't think Nacho would replace in to a scum slot down two players BUT you *do* think I would bus a third scum PR???
What I wouldn't do for a bullet...
I'll get to the rest soon.