Vote: Not_Mafia
because that post did nothing to convince me and I think he's a more viable wagon than Josh at this point
Because it addressed all the ickiness I was feeling about him without me enumerating that ickiness.In post 449, saturnine wrote:Why does that convince you? Not saying it was a scummy post in itself or anything, just doesn't seem like enough to change anyone's opinion about a possible wagon.
This is why my vote is still on you. You continually refuse to explain to me exactly why you think I'm scum. Do you honestly expect some sort of genuine, intelligent defense from "oh god that post tho" and a vote? How the hell is that fair to me? If you want to call me scum, if you want to start a bandwagon on me, if you honestly do think I'm scum, so be it. But at least defend your reasons. At least STATE some fucking reasons.
Why?In post 453, goodmorning wrote:Eh. I still think he's probably Town.
I voted for you for all the reasons I've said before.In post 454, I Love Fairies wrote:This is why my vote is still on you. You continually refuse to explain to me exactly why you think I'm scum. Do you honestly expect some sort of genuine, intelligent defense from "oh god that post tho" and a vote? How the hell is that fair to me? If you want to call me scum, if you want to start a bandwagon on me, if you honestly do think I'm scum, so be it. But at least defend your reasons. At least STATE some fucking reasons.
An aside: During this Day phase, you've suspected:In post 455, I Love Fairies wrote:Why?In post 453, goodmorning wrote:Eh. I still think he's probably Town.
Right now, I'd be most willing to lynch Mr Glidder, IMD, and Saturnine.
That's literally everyone but Josh. You asking me this question therefore either shows a massive disconnect in your thinking or you haven't been sharing, both of which do not point to Town.I'm more confident in Goodmorning being scum than I am any other player in the game right now,
Then when? I doubt he'll ever be nightkilled (either because he's scum, or because scum want to keep his behaviour around).In post 457, imkingdavid wrote:But damn, I don't know if I'd feel comfortable lynching him. At least, not today.
In post 457, imkingdavid wrote:I also need to look at Glidder because I realized I somehow don't know my read on him.
How about this: GM provided her case against me and provides a non-NKA reads list and then I'll do the same, only with my case against her.In post 457, imkingdavid wrote:I'm a little hesitant to say ILF is town (my "^town" bit was wholly about the particular response she gave to my vote, not my actual read on her) because I feel she is trying too hard to play the victim, though GM is going at her a bit rough. I do agree with GM that I'd like to see the two things she requested at the end of her last post (a case and a non-NKA reads list).
Sat is null and GM is town.
Your reluctance to (kind of) take initiative and go first is noted.In post 459, I Love Fairies wrote:How about this: GM provided her case against me and provides a non-NKA reads list and then I'll do the same, only with my case against her.
I think it's only fair.
I went and skimmed your ISO, and all the recent stuff is focused on one or two players. A refresher would be nice.In post 460, goodmorning wrote:I think the entire point here is that I've made my opinions pretty clear thus far.
That's not true. I like your reads. They're easy to read. they have a lot of content. GM and Glidder are just trying to get you lynched. That's what scum do. But as you can see from the vote count nobody is buying it. The more they press on you the scummier they look. GM is probably scum, but we only get to pick one at a time.In post 466, I Love Fairies wrote:My point is that no one actually cares what my actual reads are, only that I provide them. There is literally no point in me really posting anymore.
I actually do care what your actual reads are; it's because I don't know (other than "gm is scum cause I trust myself") that I asked you to post them.In post 466, I Love Fairies wrote:My point is that no one actually cares what my actual reads are, only that I provide them. There is literally no point in me really posting anymore.
You're right that it isn't true. That said, she hasn't posted any reads. If she had they probably would be easy to read, I'll give you that. They don't have content because she hasn't posted them. That's not the point here; also, Glidder is trying to getIn post 467, Josh_B wrote:That's not true. I like your reads. They're easy to read. they have a lot of content. GM and Glidder are just trying to get you lynched. That's what scum do. But as you can see from the vote count nobody is buying it. The more they press on you the scummier they look. GM is probably scum, but we only get to pick one at a time.In post 466, I Love Fairies wrote:My point is that no one actually cares what my actual reads are, only that I provide them. There is literally no point in me really posting anymore.
GoodMorning you're probably scum. And you haven't posted a read list either, so the hypocracy of scum continues.In post 470, goodmorning wrote:o be using them somewhat constructively. The more she refuses to post a readslist, the scummier she looks. ILF is probably Scum, and she's probably today's lynch unless Josh keeps spouting things with no basis in reality.
Oh, but I did give my reasons.In post 470, goodmorning wrote:I actually do care what your actual reads are; it's because I don't know (other than "gm is scum cause I trust myself") that I asked you to post them.In post 466, I Love Fairies wrote:My point is that no one actually cares what my actual reads are, only that I provide them. There is literally no point in me really posting anymore.