I believe this is a scumtell, I forgot what it's called, when someone replaces into a slot and calls it scummy at some point.
Not that I have seen it actually be any good at catching scum >.>
I believe this is a scumtell, I forgot what it's called, when someone replaces into a slot and calls it scummy at some point.
I know I legit didn't remember that I had replaced him and it looked scummy af. Then I realized it'd be interpreted as an Ambushed tell which sucks now. But whatever I'm still townIn post 218, RachMarie wrote:I did facepalm at the Amished tell you did right away though
Not directly active lurking but... too much posting to an extent of that many of her posts contain nothing. All her posts could be grouped by one meduim sized postIn post 233, Chuck_Norris wrote:@ZZZX
Are you accusing Marquis of active lurking? I thought it was her voluminous posting that caused tn to replace out. That seems like the opposite of active lurking.
as chamber for my current IP address. I'm currently sitting on a bed in a hotel near Milwaukee... come at me bro. Also, douchebag points = earned.In post 215, Chuck_Norris wrote:The old excuse not to post when under pressure trick. Be more obvious scum.
yes, guys, keep in mind this is VI play, not SCUM play.In post 221, tn5421 wrote:I don't actually care if you quickhammer me or not, I don't want to play in a game where spamming 2 pages of content on your own is perfectly acceptable.
jesus.In post 226, tn5421 wrote:No. I'm replacing out because I refuse to deal with this.
@Mod: Please remove me from this game before my urge to break every single rule runs roughshod over my common sense
Do it all in one post then. SIt at your computer 5 mins after each line to make sure a lil' bit don't just pop out.In post 228, Marquis wrote:Jsyk it's not like I was intentionally spamming just to bother you. It's called stream of consciousness and I was doing it so you could better gauge my reactions to everything I was reading in real time- each thought has a timestamp so the thought progression is more linear
the above is the most wishy washy post in the game thus far.In post 232, ZZZX wrote:People replace out for silly reasons eh.
Anyway Back on topic. Marq is posting alot which can appear scummy and townie in the same time. I am not sure but It gives are more content to read but I still smell active lurking possibly? I dont know for sure
ohh so it isn't actually happening, but it is indirectly happening by the person who must be directly controling their posts. I do not understand your post or point at all.In post 234, ZZZX wrote:Not directly active lurking but... too much posting to an extent of that many of her posts contain nothing. All her posts could be grouped by one meduim sized postIn post 233, Chuck_Norris wrote:@ZZZX
Are you accusing Marquis of active lurking? I thought it was her voluminous posting that caused tn to replace out. That seems like the opposite of active lurking.
This would be true and I would agree with you, but the fact that he actually went through with it nulfies the point. There are no points given to replacements. He gained nothing from his stunt except getting out of a game that he thinks is toxic.In post 236, neil1113 wrote:I still think we should just finish TN and get it over with. The last few responses are extremely over-dramatic and it seems like purposefully loud. Like TN was trying to get attention to make people think it was real frustration because of personal reasons rather than because TN really is scum caught for the wrong reasons. Fortunately, myself and a few others I'm sure can see right through the fake frustration and see TN for what it's worth. My vote stays. And your vote (the reader) should come over if it hasn't yet.
Imagine you posting this post over 2 and a half pages with so much random shit. Now this post is OK content for a day or two but if you keep posting useless shit to reach this post over a long period thats called active lurking IMO. (what is marq doing)In post 239, CooLDoG wrote:as chamber for my current IP address. I'm currently sitting on a bed in a hotel near Milwaukee... come at me bro. Also, douchebag points = earned.In post 215, Chuck_Norris wrote:The old excuse not to post when under pressure trick. Be more obvious scum.yes, guys, keep in mind this is VI play, not SCUM play.In post 221, tn5421 wrote:I don't actually care if you quickhammer me or not, I don't want to play in a game where spamming 2 pages of content on your own is perfectly acceptable.jesus.In post 226, tn5421 wrote:No. I'm replacing out because I refuse to deal with this.
@Mod: Please remove me from this game before my urge to break every single rule runs roughshod over my common senseDo it all in one post then. SIt at your computer 5 mins after each line to make sure a lil' bit don't just pop out.In post 228, Marquis wrote:Jsyk it's not like I was intentionally spamming just to bother you. It's called stream of consciousness and I was doing it so you could better gauge my reactions to everything I was reading in real time- each thought has a timestamp so the thought progression is more linearthe above is the most wishy washy post in the game thus far.In post 232, ZZZX wrote:People replace out for silly reasons eh.
Anyway Back on topic. Marq is posting alot which can appear scummy and townie in the same time. I am not sure but It gives are more content to read but I still smell active lurking possibly? I dont know for sureohh so it isn't actually happening, but it is indirectly happening by the person who must be directly controling their posts. I do not understand your post or point at all.In post 234, ZZZX wrote:Not directly active lurking but... too much posting to an extent of that many of her posts contain nothing. All her posts could be grouped by one meduim sized postIn post 233, Chuck_Norris wrote:@ZZZX
Are you accusing Marquis of active lurking? I thought it was her voluminous posting that caused tn to replace out. That seems like the opposite of active lurking.
vote: zzzxThis would be true and I would agree with you, but the fact that he actually went through with it nulfies the point. There are no points given to replacements. He gained nothing from his stunt except getting out of a game that he thinks is toxic.In post 236, neil1113 wrote:I still think we should just finish TN and get it over with. The last few responses are extremely over-dramatic and it seems like purposefully loud. Like TN was trying to get attention to make people think it was real frustration because of personal reasons rather than because TN really is scum caught for the wrong reasons. Fortunately, myself and a few others I'm sure can see right through the fake frustration and see TN for what it's worth. My vote stays. And your vote (the reader) should come over if it hasn't yet.
Are you implying that there could be a case where you could feel his reasoning? This sounds a lot like caught for wrong reasons.In post 240, ZZZX wrote:I dont mind your vote but I dont feel your reasoning thou.
My usual playstyle is actually kinda scummy. Getting called out for it is normal and I am used to it. But he just went for some... weird reasons I dont understand.In post 241, BearClaw wrote:Are you implying that there could be a case where you could feel his reasoning? This sounds a lot like caught for wrong reasons.In post 240, ZZZX wrote:I dont mind your vote but I dont feel your reasoning thou.
In post 238, RachMarie wrote:Marquis is usually not that much of a poster in a game that is why it surprised me, not sure if it qualifies as a scum tell though. bah and I had such a nice scum read on Ninja
I don't like your point of attack on ZZZX, and why it's only happening now if you're suddenly thinking he's scum for being "wishy washy". That's like, the entirety of his ISO.In post 239, CooLDoG wrote:the above is the most wishy washy post in the game thus far.In post 232, ZZZX wrote:People replace out for silly reasons eh.
Anyway Back on topic. Marq is posting alot which can appear scummy and townie in the same time. I am not sure but It gives are more content to read but I still smell active lurking possibly? I dont know for sureohh so it isn't actually happening, but it is indirectly happening by the person who must be directly controling their posts. I do not understand your post or point at all.In post 234, ZZZX wrote:Not directly active lurking but... too much posting to an extent of that many of her posts contain nothing. All her posts could be grouped by one meduim sized postIn post 233, Chuck_Norris wrote:@ZZZX
Are you accusing Marquis of active lurking? I thought it was her voluminous posting that caused tn to replace out. That seems like the opposite of active lurking.
vote: zzzx
In post 236, neil1113 wrote:I still think we should just finish TN and get it over with. The last few responses are extremely over-dramatic and it seems like purposefully loud. Like TN was trying to get attention to make people think it was real frustration because of personal reasons rather than because TN really is scumcaught for the wrong reasons. Fortunately, myself and a few others I'm sure can see right through the fake frustration and see TN for what it's worth. My vote stays. And your vote (the reader) should come over if it hasn't yet.
I was first to use this phrase in the thread (201) but that's irrelevant since part of my likely unread SoC series-In post 241, BearClaw wrote:Are you implying that there could be a case where you could feel his reasoning? This sounds a lot likeIn post 240, ZZZX wrote:I dont mind your vote but I dont feel your reasoning thou.caught for wrong reasons.
It sounds like you're attempting to push Bear... so why am I quoted in this? What do I have to do with your suspicions on Bear? I'm a tad confused. Are you saying because we both used the same phrase, we're scum-mates?In post 247, Marquis wrote:I was first to use this phrase in the thread (201) but that's irrelevant since part of my likely unread SoC series-
So neil used it referring it to tn, and BearClaw used it referring to ZZZX. BearClaw's post and the repetition of the phrase are both a bit unsettling.
First, their attempt to draw an implication out of ZZZX's post is a huge stretch; ZZZX just basically meant "sure you can vote me but give a good reason", and trying to extrapolate to "caught for the wrong reasons" from that is, like. No. It's kind of ridiculous to treat the post as if it were a scumslip.
Second, it's to the point where "caught for the wrong reasons" just sounds like a buzz[word]phrase now, almost like it was thrown out there because it makes him sound scummier. He isn't scummier, or scum for that matter.