Of course it is a threat. But maybe not such a strong one, because I just could have hammered without a comment and let the rest of the game play out.In post 749, Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:Billi, I'll be honest, I really don't know what you're saying. How is jklash implying that he can't night kill any different from any of his other posts where he claims to be town and that me or Jake must be scum because of that and how is it any different from Jake or I saying we're town which we've both done several times and thus implying that we can't make the night kill? Because I'll be honest, I don't see a difference.
Bb: I'll have to live with that, that you don't understand me. It happens.
And again your post isn't super clear but I think everything later in your post rests upon that first assumption which I just explained is a bad assumption. But let's take apart the next part, how is my reluctance to vote a scum thing? If I was scum why wouldn't I take the opportunity that was already presented and hammer Jake? At that point I had both you and DTD on my side and would've gotten my preferred lynch; surely it would've been better for hypothetical scum-me to just hammer instead of letting the day extend for no good reason where those things could fall apart, yeah?
Bb: Yes, you could have hammered, but if you are a mafioso, you would not have wanted to hammer too quickly. That has the danger of luring too many votes the day after.
So if the final line is a threat towards me then I've already explained why the assumptions that lead you there are wrong but also you already read and agreed with the reasons I presented why I was town and furthermore, I'm the one who has presented the most compelling reasons why Jake is scum and even reasons why jk might be scum. I'll agree that there's probably not much to be gained at this point, I've poked and prodded where I've wanted to and if you want to set DTD up for intent to hammer I'll set you up.
VOTE: Jake
Nice voting :
VOTE: Jake from State Farm