What distinguishes Rach from everyone else? None of us are exactly doing amazingly here
Also, what is NM doing? Worst play I’ve ever seen.
I can't remember the last N_M post that wasn't bland, unimaginative and lame. Some shitposters are at least somewhat funny. You are the epitomy of the type of poster that nobody would miss if you were to suddenly disappear. You never add anything of value.
I'm guessing you haven't read the game and probably never will? Why even sign up to play?
I like your vote, your reasons are bad. You more or less repeated what I said but in a different fashion. Claiming an awesome scum hunting thing while mimicking me isnt really scumhunting. Just saying.
Lets see I scum read Marquis' pred, and thought he replaced in and I started questioning my read, I still have not put him in my town pile, just explored others as well,. I scum read sns.
Lets see I scum read Marquis' pred, and thought he replaced in and I started questioning my read, I still have not put him in my town pile, just explored others as well,. I scum read sns.
Thoughts on Bear/Saki?
And why do you scum read me. Just for the supposed role fishing?
Lets see I scum read Marquis' pred, and thought he replaced in and I started questioning my read, I still have not put him in my town pile, just explored others as well,. I scum read sns.
Which part from my read was inaccurate?
Quote it and prove it and I will gladly go back from my read.
However I am not sure yet. The lynch today is either cool as a policy OR rach for a higher chance.
I never loved policy lynches but I don't find anyone scummy enough to warrant a lynch and it seems we have to make a tough choose here.
In post 363, snscompt1 wrote:"Some how you now town read sns and feel bad about Cool Dog after Sns posts a list? Really not wanting to scum read anyone at all?"
All false.
That isnt even half false.
She scum read you until you posted your reads. and suddenly goes on cool dog after 0 posts about him. (then goes back to you)
Im bot defending her. Im arguing your clearly misrepped posts. And her train of thought IS the text. I understood what she was saying, and you apparently dont. She never said I was town. Ever. Quote it. She was right to attack cooldog because he wasnt providing anything useful. I still think shes scum, but if you keep misrepping her, you make MY case look bad. Understand? Read what she says carefully then make your argument. I think shes scum and want her lynched but youre not helping.
And if Rach flips scum, Im not her partner. Im not scum period. Making a case against my scum partner on Day 1 and managing to get her lynched would give me an incredible amount of town points but that is idiotic seeing how there are only two scum and some doctors have more or less vig roles. Rethink it a bit.
In post 353, snscompt1 wrote:I like your vote, your reasons are bad. You more or less repeated what I said but in a different fashion. Claiming an awesome scum hunting thing while mimicking me isnt really scumhunting. Just saying.
In post 363, snscompt1 wrote:"Some how you now town read sns and feel bad about Cool Dog after Sns posts a list? Really not wanting to scum read anyone at all?"
All false.
way to make yourself look bad.
and I dont think I changed the case inbetween those 2 posts. You went from me mimicking you to an ALL FALSE case?
In post 353, snscompt1 wrote:I like your vote, your reasons are bad. You more or less repeated what I said but in a different fashion. Claiming an awesome scum hunting thing while mimicking me isnt really scumhunting. Just saying.
In post 363, snscompt1 wrote:"Some how you now town read sns and feel bad about Cool Dog after Sns posts a list? Really not wanting to scum read anyone at all?"
All false.
way to make yourself look bad.
and I dont think I changed the case inbetween those 2 posts. You went from me mimicking you to an ALL FALSE case?
I already explained how it was false. Post 367.
Um, yes I do? I treat everyone equally. If she isnt scum and Im wrong, Id like to give her the benefit of the doubt.
Then why did you say I made a good case right after I made it?
In post 373, snscompt1 wrote:I already explained how it was false. Post 367.
Um, yes I do? I treat everyone equally. If she isnt scum and Im wrong, Id like to give her the benefit of the doubt.
Then why did you say I made a good case right after I made it?
Can you quote that? I dont remeber I did (On phone so i cant really navigate anything other than this page)
Also 367 didnt explain it at all. She wasn't thinking that?