Mafia with the Quickness 2 GAME OVER!

Perpetual Nonsense · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:01 am

In post 47, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Say I were to counterclaim this???

We'll gladly take the 1 for 1 trade.

Zachrulez · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:05 am

2nd Vote Count of Day 1

Slandaar

(4): Juls, Hoopla, Ser Arthur Dayne, jasonT1981

Speedy Saki

(3): SleepyKrew, Feu et Vol, Oversoul

Imperium

(1): Perpetual Nonsense

Desperado

(1): Desperado

Not Voting

(10): Sugoku Sugoi, Imperium, Slice of Life, Nero Cain, Nobody Special, SaintKerrigan, helium-3, Slandaar, Speedy Saki, Not_Mafia

With 19 alive, it takes 10 to lynch.

Day 1 ends in (expired on 2014-06-17 09:00:00)

SleepyKrew · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:07 am

In post 48, jasonT1981 wrote:then we lynch him, if he is miller, we lynch you... simples

Are
You
Serious

jasonT1981 · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:19 am

I'll let you work it out

SaintKerrigan · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:35 am

Vote: SleepyKrew

There can only be one SK.

With that out of the way:
- Three negative town roles already claimed. I'm not sure yet what to think about that.
- desp, please clarify your role. Does it allow daytalk for scum, or does it control all scum talk?
- desp's role needs to be eliminated. Scum communication is lethal in the hands of competent scumteams. If it's daytalk, then we should quicklynch him. Regardless of anything else, that role can't live past Day 1.

Desperado · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:45 am

my role pm implies that multiple encryptors might exist, and if one is alive daytalk is available for all QTs

if you think i should die why bother rvsing sleepy?

jasonT1981 · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:48 am

Isn't encryptor usually a scum role????

Desperado · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:53 am

yup

that's why i need to die

peep the self vote and then sheep it

jasonT1981 · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:55 am

Desp - can you go into anymore detail on your PM without breaking rules?

By implying multiple encryptors, I am assuming multiball scum?

Juls · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:58 am

unvote, vote: desp

Taking one for the team. Good on you.

SaintKerrigan · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:05 am

@ desp: wanted to see your reply to my question first. However, if there's more than one of you, then quicklynching you right now is not the best idea, since it will not immediately eliminate the threat.

In case it's not obvious:
@all: Any other encryptors should claim asap. As in immediately.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:10 am

In post 53, jasonT1981 wrote:I'll let you work it out

UNVOTE:
VOTE: jason

Ser Arthur Dayne · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:10 am

In post 59, Juls wrote:
unvote, vote: desp

Taking one for the team. Good on you.

Why do you think lynching a town encryptor is a good idea?

Ser Arthur Dayne · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:10 am

In post 50, Perpetual Nonsense wrote:
In post 47, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Say I were to counterclaim this???
We'll gladly take the 1 for 1 trade.

But what if I was seriously counter-claiming???

jasonT1981 · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:11 am

It won't cut of the threat, no.. you are rght, SK. However it will disable their ability to day talk, which is vital to stratagy

jasonT1981 · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:11 am

In post 61, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 53, jasonT1981 wrote:I'll let you work it out
UNVOTE:
VOTE: jason

Can't work it out then?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:11 am

In post 63, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:
In post 50, Perpetual Nonsense wrote:
In post 47, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Say I were to counterclaim this???
We'll gladly take the 1 for 1 trade.
But what if I was seriously counter-claiming???

ARE YOU SERIOUS

Juls · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:12 am

SAD if he thinks he should die, who am I to question that? As far as I know this isn't bastard so no jesters.

Ser Arthur Dayne · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:12 am

In post 54, SaintKerrigan wrote:- Three negative town roles already claimed. I'm not sure yet what to think about that.

3?

Ser Arthur Dayne · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:13 am

In post 67, Juls wrote:SAD if he thinks he should die, who am I to question that? As far as I know this isn't bastard so no jesters.

???

Why are you assuming a town encryptor is only a benefit to the scum?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:13 am

In post 64, jasonT1981 wrote:It won't cut of the threat, no.. you are rght, SK. However it will disable their ability to day talk, which is vital to stratagy

Please don't say SK
Why so confident there is only one encryptor?
Why are you willing to kill a townie just to maybe get rid of daytalk instead of doing some scumhunting?

Ser Arthur Dayne · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:14 am

In post 66, SleepyKrew wrote: ARE YOU SERIOUS

Am I???

Juls · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:14 am

I'm not making that assumption. Who does day talk benefit more though?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:15 am

In post 65, jasonT1981 wrote:
In post 61, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 53, jasonT1981 wrote:I'll let you work it out
UNVOTE:
VOTE: jason
Can't work it out then?

When has being obtuse ever helped town?
(never)
When has being obtuse ever helped scum?
(always)
When did being obtuse as town become acceptable?
(I really want to know)

SleepyKrew · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:15 am

In post 67, Juls wrote:SAD if he thinks he should die, who am I to question that? As far as I know this isn't bastard so no jesters.

jason, Juls, who else is riding the J train to scumtown?