you seemed pretty freaked out about being on the two leading deadline wagons even though i didn't say anything about you or anyone else.In post 1699, Juls wrote:I'm not freaked out. It's just like what you describe. Grunt work. No analysis just "hey look at this townie thing I did that says something super obvious but I'm not going to do the analysis, I did this other townie thing, see?"
dodging isn't gonna fly with me, sorryIn post 1686, jasonT1981 wrote:Keep telling yourself that if its what helps you get by justifying your vote.
In post 1640, jasonT1981 wrote:the encryptor claims hint towards thatIn post 1602, Feu et Vol wrote:"but how do you know that scum have daytalk, if you're not SCUM!?????!??"
no, i said that "this game will hit easy mode sooner rather than later." future tense.In post 1704, Juls wrote:Reads develop. I could care less if you think I was "freaked out". My point was that you said the game was easy mode because of this info so I am telling you that it's not if that's the analysis you got from your VC regurgitation. In fact, I interpreted it exactly opposite. I.e, we are on the wrong track, not easy mode
it's generically badIn post 1706, Sugoku Sugoi wrote:desp what do you think about jason and his reaction to my push on him?
fwiw, I agree with slandaar scum at this point, but I'd rather not have a scenario where we divide our attention between 2 scum and they get out of it
Could you put this reaction into words for me, so as to lessen the ambiguity?In post 1705, SleepyKrew wrote:In post 1640, jasonT1981 wrote:the encryptor claims hint towards thatIn post 1602, Feu et Vol wrote:"but how do you know that scum have daytalk, if you're not SCUM!?????!??"
not OMGUS since I haven't even said I think you are scum... just that you seemed to know more about the NKsIn post 1703, Sugoku Sugoi wrote:also I love how jason's reaction to me pushing him was to OMGUS me. that seems like scum flail 101 right there.
In post 1702, Sugoku Sugoi wrote:dodging isn't gonna fly with me, sorryIn post 1686, jasonT1981 wrote:Keep telling yourself that if its what helps you get by justifying your vote.
you sound like you're in a predicament, curious what the benefit of saying things like this is?
In post 1591, Hoopla wrote:Good work gang
hoopla for that frenetic optimism, while obscure about her/his full goals. most posts are short and dont have a great point in themIn post 1556, Hoopla wrote:This day is railroaded towards a shos lynch. Lets get on with it shall we??
This outcome indicates that scum were in a relatively safe position all day, which is what I was starting to become of aware of towards the end of the day (it seemed obvious that all are major wagons were prob-town) - a slew of slow stalling wagons with no real impetus indicates that scum have no team members in the line of fire, so they aren't going to push other wagons to further the game or consider bussing. I think the scumteam will lie in the lurkers who have flown under the radar and essentially players who have come under little pressure. I'm expecting vote-parky behaviour early on wagons for scum, with frequent vote-hoppers amongst the town wagons to be very townie.In post 1669, Desperado wrote:all three major deadline wagons being on town (and us being aware of that immediately) makes me think that this game is gonna hit easy mode sooner rather than later
In post 1719, Perpetual Nonsense wrote:Ugh, I was hoping no one would ask since now I have to give reasons and they're controversial. Be careful what you ask for.
<Hoopla, SAD, Saki>
then lurkers - Mastin, Slandaar
Okay, that sort of makes sense and vaguely in line with ours. How does Arthur feel calculated here as opposed to in NY169? What are your thoughts on JasonT1981 and SleepyKrew?In post 1720, Perpetual Nonsense wrote:SAD is being really different from 169 where he was a pinball machine tunneling people like me, he's way more calculated here.
In post 1591, Hoopla wrote:Good work ganghoopla for that frenetic optimism, while obscure about her/his full goals. most posts are short and dont have a great point in themIn post 1556, Hoopla wrote:This day is railroaded towards a shos lynch. Lets get on with it shall we??
and Saki for making little sense at the end of D1, more of a "let's set up" kinda tone
Fits the profile of what I'm expecting scum's behaviour to be. The reason the game was so slow and no wagons were getting off the ground was because scum felt safe and were just chilling on safe votes.In post 1722, Perpetual Nonsense wrote:Why exactly are you wary of Sugoi?
