Starting with his 42: I took the first line as referring to the lynch and commented on it in my 60. He claimed that his 42 was referring to "all these FOS posts made by everyone", but it looked like an odd reaction if it was that. I asked him which posts he meant. He ignored that in his next post, despite finding time to post a youtube link, and only later did he reply giving a couple of posts which I don't think really warranted his comment, and questioning my description of Scarab as "possibly town". I asked him in 75 what set 40 and 41 apart from the other posts there and again he's ignored the question which leads me to think that he was just using them as an excuse.In post 123, NicCage wrote:Lia, what is it that bothers you about Oka's day 2 play?
I also thought his posts about Porkens' scum QT gambit were odd. The fact that he made all that fuss without even going to the first page and mousing over the link to see if it really was a QT points to him having already seen the scum role pm and assuming the copy contained the same link.
Not really if it's to their advantage. Unlikely in the way it was done here, yes, but wouldn't that be a good reason for doing it? If he thought Xay was being too obviously scummy, he could well have thought it better to just cut his losses and get rid of a liability.In post 123, NicCage wrote:Don't you think it's unlikely that scum would hammer their own partner?
Or he's just acting crazy. He's shown in the past that he does know the value of avoiding a quick lynch.In post 124, OkaPoka wrote:Or Porkens is a crazy person.
