In post 2273, Titus wrote:Didn't I tell you scum would be fucking obvious if they are required to fucking talk?
In post 2276, SnowStorm wrote:@Jiffy If that's parroting then I'm a duck.
I have elaborated on my read on you. I have told you why I suspect you in a very clear manner. And you just keep on painting it all black.
In post 2276, SnowStorm wrote:
And now you're postponing your thoughts on that again. There's no reason for you to not have posted your thoughts yet. Know what? I don't think you had or have any actual thoughts on the subject. You were just throwing shit in our PT's walls to see if it would stick.
In post 1918, borkjerfkin wrote:In post 1916, Nero Cain wrote:So why Storm and not Titus? They are both calling Toog town for what he did. You think scumstorm is sheeping towntitus?
I am really, really conflicted about Titus (as I've said) and want to vote with Majiffy and Rogue here, who I both think are town.
In post 2280, Rogue wrote:Majiffy assuming snowstorm flips scum do you think mollie is scum for trying to bait mala to move our vote off the wagon as well as hard defending him
In post 2279, Nero Cain wrote:Jiffy, what is your read on Toog?
In post 2274, Titus wrote:I'd be shocked if I lived to see tomorrow, so I'm going to make sure we get today's lynch right.
Oh and Mollie, I'll grab you the fucking posts... and we'll see who is right, you or me.
In post 2278, Majiffy wrote:In post 2276, SnowStorm wrote:@Jiffy If that's parroting then I'm a duck.
I have elaborated on my read on you. I have told you why I suspect you in a very clear manner. And you just keep on painting it all black.
Quote or it didn't happen. I'll wait.
In post 2276, SnowStorm wrote:
And now you're postponing your thoughts on that again. There's no reason for you to not have posted your thoughts yet. Know what? I don't think you had or have any actual thoughts on the subject. You were just throwing shit in our PT's walls to see if it would stick.
There's actually a pretty good reason and I've already explained it thoroughly.
But again, that'd require you to actually read my posts.
In post 2212, SnowStorm wrote:In post 2191, Majiffy wrote:Now are you going to give your own reasons why I'm scum or are you just going to parrot Mollie's paranoia?
You voted me for no reason, sheeping Rogue. When you did give some reasons (just now), they were not alignment indicative. You're not justifying a vote or a scum read, you're just trying to make me look bad by accusing me of stuff like fencesitting and not giving original opinions and calling my posts and reactions bad. There's not a single instance where you appear to be trying to get a read on me.
By not giving reasons to suspect me or interacting with me you give me no way to defend myself and prove you wrong. Basically, I can't deny any of your accusations because there aren't any. And yet you're pushing for my lynch. This allows you to just keep pushing me because eventually those reasons will come. For example, saying my reaction to the votes on me was "bad", as if there was any good reaction. By voting me you expected me to react and no matter how I did it you could just call it bad; from them on it's a domino effect. You keep pushing crap on me as if you're owning this and I'll keep reacting and giving you more "reasons" to keep pushing me. It's the same thing that happened with Titus.
I'm used to this. As Speaker accurately noted, I am lynchbait and every game there's one smartass scumfuck that tries pulling this crap on me.
In post 2280, Rogue wrote:Majiffy assuming snowstorm flips scum do you think mollie is scum for trying to bait mala to move our vote off the wagon as well as hard defending him
In post 2284, Majiffy wrote:Mollie you went back to ignoring me.
In post 2280, Rogue wrote:Majiffy assuming snowstorm flips scum do you think mollie is scum for trying to bait mala to move our vote off the wagon as well as hard defending him
In post 2212, SnowStorm wrote:You voted me for no reason, sheeping Rogue. When you did give some reasons (just now), they were not alignment indicative.
In post 2212, SnowStorm wrote:You're not justifying a vote or a scum read, you're just trying to make me look bad by accusing me of stuff like fencesitting and not giving original opinions and calling my posts and reactions bad. There's not a single instance where you appear to be trying to get a read on me.
In post 2212, SnowStorm wrote:By not giving reasons to suspect me or interacting with me you give me no way to defend myself and prove you wrong. Basically, I can't deny any of your accusations because there aren't any. And yet you're pushing for my lynch.
In post 2212, SnowStorm wrote: This allows you to just keep pushing me because eventually those reasons will come.
In post 2212, SnowStorm wrote:For example, saying my reaction to the votes on me was "bad", as if there was any good reaction.
In post 2212, SnowStorm wrote:By voting me you expected me to react and no matter how I did it you could just call it bad; from them on it's a domino effect. You keep pushing crap on me as if you're owning this and I'll keep reacting and giving you more "reasons" to keep pushing me. It's the same thing that happened with Titus.
In post 2212, SnowStorm wrote:I'm used to this. As Speaker accurately noted, I am lynchbait and every game there's one smartass scumfuck that tries pulling this crap on me.
In post 2287, Speaker for the Dead wrote:In post 2284, Majiffy wrote:Mollie you went back to ignoring me.
cos you are shitposting and you know it but what is bad is that you are doing this consciously.
and i don't think you are town
In post 2157, SnowStorm wrote:In post 2144, Speaker for the Dead wrote:cos you are?
ika thinks you are newbscum and from ika's perspective he thinks the game is easily solvable. it makes me lean town on ika but he is useless when it comes down to working with townreads or anything outside of his mindset. cos he simply won't.
Right.
In post 2212, SnowStorm wrote:
I'm used to this. As Speaker accurately noted, I am lynchbait and every game there's one smartass scumfuck that tries pulling this crap on me.
In post 2290, Titus wrote:Snowstorm, do you have a response to the allegation that you've been parroting my reads for the most part but for Venmar?
In post 2296, SnowStorm wrote:In post 2290, Titus wrote:Snowstorm, do you have a response to the allegation that you've been parroting my reads for the most part but for Venmar?
Who alleged that? I haven't parroted anyone. I have a fully working brain to think for myself, and if I want to say something that has already been said by someone else I'll just say I agree.
