---
IAI 8 wrote:Oh hello by the way....where are my manners?
Scum tend to have less manners.
---
SK 12 wrote:This avatar made that little exchange infinitely better.
Thank you AP for giving me this.
Do you change it from good cop to bad cop depending on your mood?
---
Drew 37 wrote:@ Farside. The guys been on the site for 3 years. How is he an eager puppy with a new toy?
What did farside say that would have anything to do with his site experience?
Drew 37 wrote:This isn't a defence of his poor questioning either; more his interaction.
This reads like you're going out of your way to not attach yourself to SK. This post is kind of crappy, imo. Also, I have no idea what your 34 is referring to. I guess you mean the sandy vagina thing? reinoe seemed to take it in stride.
Anyway, this whole post is Drew bending over backwards to appear overly sensitive, overly defensive (of SK), and overly aware that he might be seen as defensive (of SK).
---
Cyberbob 52 wrote:Anyway. Reinoe has an extremely ironic signature.Vote: reinoe
Heh. I like this. Better than SK's rationale anyway.
---
Dessew 54 wrote:Please stop making posts like this. He's a grown-up man, let him explain himself.
This. I got the same vibe.
VOTE: Drew-Sta
---
Goofy 67 wrote:On a serious note, since they are in the same post, which will be counted, I assume sleeps because it's lower, but it's the first time I've encountered this.
The lower vote should count unless the mod has any sort of special rules concerning it. Overall good post though.
---
pops 69 wrote:Konowa is pretty sketchy though. The personal nature of Skrew's vote makes Konowa's bandwagoning for the same motive unlikely. It's unlikely he has a different motive either, because he didn't post a different motive, and my own perspective didn't see anything scummy in reinoe's last couple posts.
I kind of agree with this. I didn't really "get" what the reinoe vote was all about. I think farside noticed this too. You think she scared him off?