Mini 1591: PFs Flavorless Normal (Game Over)

RedCoyote · Post Post #125 (ISO) » Fri Jul 25, 2014 3:49 pm

Don't get defensive. You should've used two sentences. It wasn't obvious because none of those players were voting reinoe.

Cyberbob · Post Post #126 (ISO) » Fri Jul 25, 2014 3:51 pm

Are you really accusing me of getting defensive after writing this post?

In post 115, RedCoyote wrote:Bob, really? I said I agreed with your vote against him and the premise behind it. I have my own individual points against Drew that I want to pursue. I didn't just join in for shits and giggles, and you're tying Drew and SK alignment's together far too early over one post. I thought it sounded suspicious, but let's not go crazy. So for you to make the implication (correct me if I'm wrong) that because I am voting Drew, the person that overly defended SK and tried to make it seem like he didn't, and because SK is a town read of yours at the moment, then that means I am de facto chainsaw defending reinoe. That's a lot of assumptions to be making about four different players.

Cyberbob · Post Post #127 (ISO) » Fri Jul 25, 2014 3:52 pm

Also yes it was obvious sorry.

RedCoyote · Post Post #128 (ISO) » Fri Jul 25, 2014 3:59 pm

I thought you lobbed a pretty baseless accusation at me, so of course I'm going to criticize you for it. Now you're giving me this "it was obvious, you're making stuff up in your head" crap when we're on the same page here. I agree with your case, and I am not suspicious of SK at the moment. I'm just telling you don't write about a group of people and then single out one of them in the same sentence. It was awkward and confusing.

Cyberbob · Post Post #129 (ISO) » Fri Jul 25, 2014 4:00 pm

Whatever.

reinoe · Post Post #130 (ISO) » Fri Jul 25, 2014 4:30 pm

In post 118, reinoe wrote:
In post 95, Cyberbob wrote:PS there are almost certainly semi-lurking scum.

how many scum here...

[I am innocent, goofydood, popsofctown]

SleepyKrew · Post Post #131 (ISO) » Fri Jul 25, 2014 5:01 pm

Well this game stopped being fun

SleepyKrew · Post Post #132 (ISO) » Fri Jul 25, 2014 5:01 pm

I don't want to get in trouble for being too mean though
So instead you get this post

SleepyKrew · Post Post #133 (ISO) » Fri Jul 25, 2014 5:08 pm

In post 130, reinoe wrote:
In post 118, reinoe wrote:
In post 95, Cyberbob wrote:PS there are almost certainly semi-lurking scum.

how many scum here...

[I am innocent, goofydood, popsofctown]

It was a stupid question. At least, from my naïve, inexperienced understanding. Sorry if it's just too high level for me. No hablo inteligente

RedCoyote · Post Post #134 (ISO) » Fri Jul 25, 2014 5:10 pm

I don't get The Matrix reference. Are you saying people are dodging that question?

Cyberbob · Post Post #135 (ISO) » Fri Jul 25, 2014 5:13 pm

In post 130, reinoe wrote:
In post 118, reinoe wrote:
In post 95, Cyberbob wrote:PS there are almost certainly semi-lurking scum.

how many scum here...

[I am innocent, goofydood, popsofctown]

Oh, was that an actual question? I assume PF is running about as 'standard' a setup as it gets so there's probably 3 scum total. SK might be possible but it's unlikely.

What I was saying in that post was that there are numerous people coasting or semi-coasting and that it's likely that at least one of the scumteam is among them.

reinoe · Post Post #136 (ISO) » Fri Jul 25, 2014 5:20 pm

RedCoyote wrote:I don't get The Matrix reference. Are you saying people are dodging that question?

Cyberbob certainly was.

reinoe · Post Post #137 (ISO) » Fri Jul 25, 2014 5:23 pm

In post 135, Cyberbob wrote:
In post 130, reinoe wrote:
In post 118, reinoe wrote:
In post 95, Cyberbob wrote:PS there are almost certainly semi-lurking scum.

how many scum here...

[I am innocent, goofydood, popsofctown]

Oh, was that an actual question? I assume PF is running about as 'standard' a setup as it gets so there's probably 3 scum total. SK might be possible but it's unlikely.

What I was saying in that post was that there are numerous people coasting or semi-coasting and that it's likely that at least one of the scumteam is among them.

So basically you said something you weren't even going to back up and when you got called on it you decided to just give some vague answer.

reinoe · Post Post #138 (ISO) » Fri Jul 25, 2014 5:24 pm

In post 133, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 130, reinoe wrote:
In post 118, reinoe wrote:
In post 95, Cyberbob wrote:PS there are almost certainly semi-lurking scum.

how many scum here...

[I am innocent, goofydood, popsofctown]

It was a stupid question. At least, from my naïve, inexperienced understanding. Sorry if it's just too high level for me. No hablo inteligente

Your ISO is filled with a remarkable amount of garbage.

Cyberbob · Post Post #139 (ISO) » Fri Jul 25, 2014 5:25 pm

Is this some kind of obnoxiousness gambit?

reinoe · Post Post #140 (ISO) » Fri Jul 25, 2014 5:34 pm

In post 139, Cyberbob wrote:Is this some kind of obnoxiousness gambit?

My Gambits Are Really Spectacular EXCLAMATION POINT

SleepyKrew · Post Post #141 (ISO) » Fri Jul 25, 2014 5:41 pm

In post 102, SleepyKrew wrote:I'll address other reinoe stuff when I get home later.

Wow SleepyKrew, you're really funny! Haha, you addressing reinoe, what a hilarious joke.

reinoe · Post Post #142 (ISO) » Fri Jul 25, 2014 5:44 pm

In post 141, SleepyKrew wrote:
In post 102, SleepyKrew wrote:I'll address other reinoe stuff when I get home later.

Wow SleepyKrew, you're really funny! Haha, you addressing reinoe, what a hilarious joke.

Are you at home now?

Goofyd00d · Post Post #143 (ISO) » Fri Jul 25, 2014 6:45 pm

In post 112, Cyberbob wrote:I'm not really looking for you to comment on any one thing in particular, just for you to comment on
something
other than lazily berating SK for supposedly being so absentminded

SK's question wasn't terribly hard hitting but that only makes it weirder that anyone would bother to not answer it. What did Goofy have to lose?

Ignoring the overly agressive guys inane question is apparently scummy, or you can't read, going with option 2.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #144 (ISO) » Fri Jul 25, 2014 6:46 pm

holy shit just answer the question

SleepyKrew · Post Post #145 (ISO) » Fri Jul 25, 2014 6:46 pm

also WHAT ARE YOUR READS

Goofyd00d · Post Post #146 (ISO) » Fri Jul 25, 2014 6:48 pm

The end of the game will be here and I still won't have answered it, reads coming tomorrow maybe, bed now.

Cyberbob · Post Post #147 (ISO) » Fri Jul 25, 2014 6:49 pm

In post 143, Goofyd00d wrote:
In post 112, Cyberbob wrote:I'm not really looking for you to comment on any one thing in particular, just for you to comment on
something
other than lazily berating SK for supposedly being so absentminded

SK's question wasn't terribly hard hitting but that only makes it weirder that anyone would bother to not answer it. What did Goofy have to lose?

Ignoring the overly agressive guys inane question is apparently scummy, or you can't read, going with option 2.

He was not being aggressive at all initially. He only started getting irritated when you started refusing to answer.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #148 (ISO) » Fri Jul 25, 2014 6:49 pm

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Goofy
As others have demonstrated, my knowledge is clearly at or below newb level, so please educate me as to why people do RVS

Cyberbob · Post Post #149 (ISO) » Fri Jul 25, 2014 6:51 pm

Also Goofy, no question is too inane in mafia - there is always something that can be read into either the substance or the demeanour of an answer.