In post 2567, Shinobi wrote:No, I get what you're saying, it's just that what you're saying is contradictory when you simply have no evidence either way.
You say her play is scummy and nonsensical, which it is, but then you're turning around and townreading her because of mechanics that you simply have no way of understanding or figuring out on your own regardless. Hoopla might or might not be lying about her role, and you simply have no way of distinguishing between the two, in yet you're townreading her for information that is impossible for you to interpret.
The hell is this.
Lets try again. One last time.
I think hoopla is town. I disagree with using that ability D2 like it was used because it was a waaay shot in the dark that, if failed, would have turned into dominoes that could have potentially lost the game. However, that disagreement doesn't change that the series of actions that took place make very, very little sense from scum.
As for "evidence" and "lying about her role" considering the fact that the
things that have happened that she's claimed to have done no one else claimed and were clearly visible
I have negative idea of what you're aiming at there.
There is no contradiction. There is no discussion point here. Hoopla is town.
I've voting with my gut scum read of hoopla.
The gladiator thing she never pushed for reads and bob was not obviously going to be lynched and auto town credit.
Her I think there is scum in each neighborhood but not pushing those reads. Example she doesn't scum read spy so should oversoul be pushed as scum over shin if she believes scum in each hood?
I've thought about that part of it too. But if the plan was throw ZZZX to the wolves what is step 2? Because, and I wasn't the only one, I was absolutely 100% ready for no words voting D3 on a town flip there.
And, unless its "have to throw a buddy" if hoopla was scum why pick a scum on that gamble?