In post 312, Dessew wrote:A case on town-pops with quotes would have ended up quoting all his posts with more than two lines, so here I go with no quotes. That sentence was the title of a spoiler, but I don't even need to spoiler it. Pops is town because he's actively trying to move the game further. His posts are overall collected and they have a purpose. Example: his stance on the reinoe-SK debate. The whole thing became a mere penis measurement competition, imo, I mean the only actual substance that could be sqeezed out of it appeared just recently. (Reinoe, you should really explain how we were supposed to find out whom you're scumreading from those lists.) Instead of this he actively tried to change the conversation to 'a lynch with strong merits'. That's my case: his ISO has plenty of useful town motivation. (The activity thing isn't unconditionally true, though, or at least I don't agree.)
SK: you said your push on farside wasn't for real (i.e. wasn't genuine.) I'm not saying that insincere=scummy, that's not true at all, but many players do think this way, or at least start their cases based on such (see: wagons all around the site based on anti-towniness, stupidness &c.) So you could have expected that you were gonna be called out! Then why on earth did consider reinoe's vote on you so extraordinary. I don't even remember which post I answered originally, I just want you to come out of the tunnel for now if reinoe manages to explain himself.
reinoe: I write it here, again: how was anyone supposed to know that Konowa being in a bracket means a scumread, but the same for the others doesn't?
sidenote: I've played an open with reinoe, he was scum and much more collected than now.
Cyberbob: I'm an Orthodox Konowa Lyncher, I think the Original Yup Case is sufficient. (He hasn't given much more, yet.)
Goofy or Drew, as I cannot really tell them apart:
During the weekend I can always find a good reason not to post, I spent Sunday with my grandmother then I watched the
LEN final. Anyway, asking questions doesn't mean not providing content (to be more precise, if there are question marks at the end of each sentence, there can be still statement, regardless.)
I didn't duplicate any question.
Where did I say anything about SK's meta?
That'd have been a very bad gambit, but I have already stated that I had had no actual plan in my head.
Farside, Cooldog, RC and IAI are flying over my head, I'm gonna read them throughly.