BoP... lynch all liars philosophy. It doesn't help town at all, especially this early on in the game. It'd be different halfway through the game. Or with less people.
In post 4400, Majiffy wrote:Care to elaborate? With quotes? Or maybe anything that makes sense and doesn't sound like a crazy person having a conversation with someone who doesn't exist?
Answer, scumfuck.
Only playing in games at personal moderator and/or 50%+ playerlist request.
In post 4426, neil1113 wrote:BoP... lynch all liars philosophy. It doesn't help town at all, especially this early on in the game. It'd be different halfway through the game. Or with less people.
Mhork, cut the crap - are you claiming to be undead town? this is functionally a miller, you know. you just didn't know that gamestart. but all the other undead are probscum. I'd also guess there's a godfather, maybe? scum demon?
neil, please explain..? if you got a guilty, claiming would be beneficial right now imo.
In post 4432, shos wrote:neil, please explain..? if you got a guilty, claiming would be beneficial right now imo.
I agree! 'cause then you guys would lynch me but I'm going to flip town which confirms Neil as scum.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 4426, neil1113 wrote:BoP... lynch all liars philosophy. It doesn't help town at all, especially this early on in the game. It'd be different halfway through the game. Or with less people.
How is NC lying though?
This pretty yuck though. Its p obvious what Neil is getting at. I softclaim vig, no shot hence in his black and white mind I am "lying".
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
It doesn't though. Just like his case on you is silly, the reverse of 'only scum would push this silly case' is equally silly.
It's easily possible he's crazy town who believes what he's selling. Frankly, as scum, i would tend to expect him to believe that town would sell what he's selling - so all we've established from him is that he generally does believe what he's saying. That's not a valid scumtell.
In post 4426, neil1113 wrote:BoP... lynch all liars philosophy. It doesn't help town at all, especially this early on in the game. It'd be different halfway through the game. Or with less people.
How is NC lying though?
This pretty yuck though. Its p obvious what Neil is getting at. I softclaim vig, no shot hence in his black and white mind I am "lying".
I'm a Bird of Prey, I don't eat bread. I eat meat.
In post 4439, Squirrel Girl wrote:It doesn't though. Just like his case on you is silly, the reverse of 'only scum would push this silly case' is equally silly.
It's easily possible he's crazy town who believes what he's selling. Frankly, as scum, i would tend to expect him to believe that town would sell what he's selling - so all we've established from him is that he generally does believe what he's saying. That's not a valid scumtell.
So if he were to claim a guilty on me and then I get lynched and flip town, you'd let him live?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 4439, Squirrel Girl wrote:It doesn't though. Just like his case on you is silly, the reverse of 'only scum would push this silly case' is equally silly.
It's easily possible he's crazy town who believes what he's selling. Frankly, as scum, i would tend to expect him to believe that town would sell what he's selling - so all we've established from him is that he generally does believe what he's saying. That's not a valid scumtell.
So if he were to claim a guilty on me and then I get lynched and flip town, you'd let him live?
That question connects to nothing I said.
But if your point is he was claiming an investigation role, and fakeclaimed a guilty on you - yes, I would make him a lynch. I don't see how that affects what I said above though.
It affects what you said above 'cause I never said ANYTHING about "well he has to be scum 'cause this case is so cray cray"
What WAS said is that shos said that Neil should claim a guilty if he has one and I said that I agreed that he should so you guys can lynch him when I flip town. Its your 4439 that doesn't make any sense in the conversation.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.