Newbie 1517: Crossroads Mafia (Game Over)

Clusk92 · Post Post #450 (ISO) » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:03 am

L-1 now

acryon · Post Post #451 (ISO) » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:04 am

In post 446, Billi bilaði wrote:Not_Mafia (when RachMarie) has already claimed VT.

This doesn't mean anything IMO.

acryon · Post Post #452 (ISO) » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:05 am

In post 450, Clusk92 wrote:L-1 now

Are we really going to get close to taking down the same scum(N_M) again and instead counter-wagon onto a town?

Not_Mafia · Post Post #453 (ISO) » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:05 am

Do you mean VT claims in general or that she claimed Vt?

Glass · Post Post #454 (ISO) » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:07 am

Dammit acryon, why do you have to make me second guess myself.

Clusk92 · Post Post #455 (ISO) » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:08 am

In post 452, acryon wrote:
In post 450, Clusk92 wrote:L-1 now

Are we really going to get close to taking down the same scum(N_M) again and instead counter-wagon onto a town?

Is he a town?

acryon · Post Post #456 (ISO) » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:08 am

In post 453, Not_Mafia wrote:Do you mean VT claims in general or that she claimed Vt?

VT claims in general. VTs can claim VT and scum can claim VT. Doesn't really mean much.

Clusk92 · Post Post #457 (ISO) » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:08 am

What makes you so sure?

P-edit @ Acryon

Clusk92 · Post Post #458 (ISO) » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:09 am

I should clarify, what makes you so sure Shaddow is town?

acryon · Post Post #459 (ISO) » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:09 am

In post 455, Clusk92 wrote:
In post 452, acryon wrote:
In post 450, Clusk92 wrote:L-1 now

Are we really going to get close to taking down the same scum(N_M) again and instead counter-wagon onto a town?

Is he a town?

I think so. I also think we should be wary of letting someone who got to L-1 last night get to L-1 again and not get lynched. Clearly there is a lot of suspicion there.

acryon · Post Post #460 (ISO) » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:10 am

In post 458, Clusk92 wrote:I should clarify, what makes you so sure Shaddow is town?

I'm less sure that Shadow is town than I am that N_M is scum.

Not_Mafia · Post Post #461 (ISO) » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:12 am

@Acryon

Doogal counterwagon: VictorDeAngelo, Billi bilaoi, Glass, shaddowez, RachMarie

Shadow Counterwagon: Not_Mafia, Malakittens, Glass, Clusk

Common link is Glass, do you think Glass is scum?

acryon · Post Post #462 (ISO) » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:15 am

In post 461, Not_Mafia wrote:@Acryon

Doogal counterwagon: VictorDeAngelo, Billi bilaoi, Glass, shaddowez, RachMarie

Shadow Counterwagon: Not_Mafia, Malakittens, Glass, Clusk

Common link is Glass, do you think Glass is scum?

No, I actually think Clusk is, but he wasn't around for the Doogal wagon to hop onto it. Also common link is you.

Not_Mafia · Post Post #463 (ISO) » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:16 am

Well of course, but what does that indicate other than my slot was being wagoned?

Billi bilaði · Post Post #464 (ISO) » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:17 am

In post 444, Clusk92 wrote:...Don't want both being put at L-1 though,
two claims would be bad
, so I may hold off for now

In post 451, acryon wrote:
In post 446, Billi bilaði wrote:Not_Mafia (when RachMarie) has already claimed VT.

This doesn't mean anything IMO.

It means something re. Clusk's statement that two claims would be bad.

Clusk92 · Post Post #465 (ISO) » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:17 am

I wouldn't have hopped on to the Doogal wagon cos it was dumb

acryon · Post Post #466 (ISO) » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:18 am

In post 465, Clusk92 wrote:I wouldn't have hopped on to the Doogal wagon cos it was dumb

Well anyone could say that after the fact, so this doesn't really help you IMO.

Clusk92 · Post Post #467 (ISO) » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:19 am

I'm an honest guy! You'll see after the game

acryon · Post Post #468 (ISO) » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:20 am

In post 464, Billi bilaði wrote:
In post 444, Clusk92 wrote:...Don't want both being put at L-1 though,
two claims would be bad
, so I may hold off for now

In post 451, acryon wrote:
In post 446, Billi bilaði wrote:Not_Mafia (when RachMarie) has already claimed VT.

This doesn't mean anything IMO.

It means something re. Clusk's statement that two claims would be bad.

Which just seems like more scum points for Clusk, because who is actually silly enough to believe that claim means anything(whether it was true or not)?

acryon · Post Post #469 (ISO) » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:21 am

In post 463, Not_Mafia wrote:Well of course, but what does that indicate other than my slot was being wagoned?

It doesn't necessarily mean anything, same reason why it doesn't mean anything to me that Glass was on both other than I think it was a mistake from him.

Billi bilaði · Post Post #470 (ISO) » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:22 am

It means that it's hard to suddenly claim PR - which is little enough, but still something.

Not_Mafia · Post Post #471 (ISO) » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:23 am

PR claims mean something, having several VT claims means the PR pool is narrowed down for scum. Every claim means something. Why did make Clusk scummy?

Billi bilaði · Post Post #472 (ISO) » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:24 am

My fingers itch to finish off shaddowez. Best I step away from the computer for a bit.

Clusk92 · Post Post #473 (ISO) » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:25 am

In post 472, Billi bilaði wrote:My fingers itch to finish off shaddowez. Best I step away from the computer for a bit.

You mean the guy you didn't scumread all of a sudden?

You do confuse me

acryon · Post Post #474 (ISO) » Thu Aug 07, 2014 4:27 am

In post 471, Not_Mafia wrote:PR claims mean something, having several VT claims means the PR pool is narrowed down for scum. Every claim means something. Why did make Clusk scummy?

PR claims do mean something, but I don't buy that VT claims mean much of anything. And that's assuming we actually believe you aren't scum. Why would you ever believe someone that says they are VT? 100% of scum could/would say that too.