In post 49, Skullduggery wrote:In post 22, notscience wrote:^this guy is town
Also, the sky is blue.
In post 26, Prof Fridays wrote:FakeGod explicitly stated flavor knowledge was not necessary, so it follows that the mafia would not be chosen by their goodness/badness in the story.
Or, you know, safe-claims could be a thing. Why is that possibility less likely than what Salamence said in 6?
In post 27, Salamence20 wrote:Because using this ability before we have reads leads me to an auto-lynch.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it sounds like you plan to use it on Notscience regardless. If that's the case, what's the point in waiting for "reads"? Whose reads in particular are you waiting for?
In post 31, Aronis wrote:I don't like Salamence. At all.
And you aren't voting for him because...?
In post 37, Salamence20 wrote:I'm not liking Reinoe, Marquis, and Rack's openings
What didn't you like about Marquis's first post? I see gibberish and nothing else.
In post 37, Salamence20 wrote:I used Vi as an example because she knows when I'm pulling a fast one vs actually trying to do something
You said you were worried aboutScum-Vi specifically, though. What difference would it make for Scum-Vi to know whether you're pulling a gambit or not? Wouldn't Town-Salamence be worried about her reaction regardless?
In post 38, Vi wrote:In post 21, Skullduggery wrote:If your claim is scummy, then why is Vi in particular the person that you're worried about?In post 10, Salamence20 wrote:No. Not a gambit.
I need to do this now becausemy claim is scummy as hell and viscum would love to take a shot
How should I interpret this?
In post 43, Aronis wrote:If Salamence's role, is really anti-town. Then there is no reason, unless he swares not to use it, can choose to not use it, and doesn't, to not lynch him.
Does this mean you believe everything about Salamence's claim so far?
I'm not saying I believe it or not, but that he should probably be lynched regardless.