That's so bad and you know it. I'm not stopping you from wagoning him. I'm not even arguing against it, or arguing for another wagon. Like, that should tell you something. If I had some agenda, I'd have something to say about it.
ETL
p-edit: Jesus christ Anti. Stop it.
Last edited by Wickedestjr on Sat Aug 16, 2014 6:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
In post 447, Lying Cat wrote:So, sthar8's babysitting this morning. He will be back later, probably later today, to post. Anti, don't feel too bad about Especially the Bird's insane reads, given that they're, you know, scum.
How do I know this? We've never hydra'd as scum. Though I just took a look at FG's game and you didn't do this. But I was also taken out very early and you had no reason to freak out on anyone.
Like, what would you do if I just fakely said, "yeah I agree"? You'd just take that go on your merry way? How is my disagreeing more scummy than that? Especially given that I actually did what you asked, gave you my observations, quoted you exactly what I was talking about, and even explained it further why I thought so? Instead of trying to figure out where your own townread might be "missing the boat", you instantly jump to "NUP. DAT SCUM"? Explain that?
ETL
p-edit: Very briefly, I
have
had you, swifty, ZZZX and BBT as town. TSO and LC as scum. Flubber/Josh as maybes/unknowns.
but it's irrelevant.
and it doesn't mean i'm wrong.
What? You admit that you are being ridiculous about your reads, that you are blindly pushing forward, and call it irrelevant and not at all related to how you could possibly be wrong?
I don't even understand this kind of head in the sand type of playstyle you're doing right now.
past behavior is the best indicator of future behavior. whenever i feel like i have a really good scumread and you shoot it down, i have chainsaw flashbacks to dark ages.
In post 461, Heartless wrote:past behavior is the best indicator of future behavior. whenever i feel like i have a really good scumread and you shoot it down, i have chainsaw flashbacks to dark ages.
ok. lol... and how many times have I shot down or disagreed with your reads in Orion? And if this is true, why didn't you do anything like this in SC's game? When I disagreed with your reads there?
In post 421, Flubbernugget wrote:I explained everything I saw in the above paragraphs of that post and and then summarized my reads in my last paragraph. What seems to be the problem with my reads that you don't consider them valid opinions?
no
you quoted random things and made little snipe-y comments about them that have that little bitter bite of scummy bitchiness in them. (the indignation over lying cat saying "gaslighting", "i have no idea what you're trying to read from your wagon")
they're not
invalid
opinions. they're not opinions at all. anything that comes close (your read on josh) is so clouded up and obscured by doublespeak that it's impossible to separate them from people you really do have no opinions on (which is.........
EVERYONE else
; except for canadian girl, you "lean town" on her which is more doublespeak)
unlike normal newbtownies, you don't seem to have a sense of the game as a whole and you don't seem to care. it looks like you're just mining at little things, hoping you look busy enough to everyone else.
it's textbook scum. unfortunately for you, i read the textbook.
you're scum.
First. I fucking said I had no read on what LC said. It was a personal issue. Maybe I'll hit him up about it after the game. I fucking admitted that had next to no relation to the game and you're still using it against me?
Do I have to beg Josh for an explanation of his wagon? Do you think he's to stupid to realize if wants to be town read by me, he can try to clarify things for me?
Your double speak rant is also full of shit. A west is leaning town. That means I have town reads on her and I have scum reads on her. These are the nit picks you're criticizing. My "double speak" is a summary of what these reads mean to me. The town things I have seen right now out weigh the scum things I have seen on her, but not by much. Do I have to explain these things in such excruciating detail? Mafia wouldn't be much fun if everyone fell asleep trying to read my posts, and that doesn't even consider all the fluff my posts would
In post 416, awestfie wrote:I'm going to try and catch up, later today. Sorry that my activity has been quite low, just a lot of things happening right now.
In post 424, Heartless wrote:...and for someone who had "notes" on the TSO vs GG fight, you had shockingly little to say about it. in fact, they ended up being "big fat null". that's a pretty dissatisfying conclusion to come to.
Well the back and forth was emotional. Let's see if you're reading my posts and grilling me on the right things.
In post 437, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:I don't really like that he is null on us and TSO. I feel it was a particularly large part of the day thus far, and an easy opportunity to choose a side.
p-edit: So, because I disagree with you, that means I'm scum?
To me it was a town v. town flamewar. If I really had to pick a side I would stick with GG right now. I trust their competence more in the event of a lynch. This is meta from ongoing games, nothing in particular to the thread.
In post 468, Flubbernugget wrote:
Do I have to beg Josh for an explanation of his wagon? Do you think he's to stupid to realize if wants to be town read by me, he can try to clarify things for me?
A WAGON! What Wagon? Where? I drew a picture of a wagon, no one one it, no one there to drive it, going nowhere. Lame and worthless.
In post 468, Flubbernugget wrote:
Do I have to beg Josh for an explanation of his wagon? Do you think he's to stupid to realize if wants to be town read by me, he can try to clarify things for me?
A WAGON! What Wagon? Where? I drew a picture of a wagon, no one one it, no one there to drive it, going nowhere. Lame and worthless.
I drew a picture of a wagon, no one one it, no one there to drive it, going nowhere. Lame and worthless.
