Mini 1602: Game Over

SleepyKrew · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:59 am

VC 1.01

Flames682

(4) - Tammy, phokdapolees, Elias_the_thief, AGar

rack

(1) - Aneninen

Tammy

(1) - Flames682

AGar

(1) - implosion

implosion

(1) shaddowez

Not Voting

(5) - Riabi, chaoslord54, Malakittens, tman2nd, rack

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.
Day 1 deadline will hit in: (expired on 2014-08-31 16:48:15)

implosion · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:27 pm

In post 22, AGar wrote:
In post 19, implosion wrote:Flames isn't scummy though.

We have a sympathizer.

I never said Flames was scummy though. I said he had too many numbers and was being dumb.

And I never claimed to direct that line at you, it was a general observation in light of his being wagoned.

tman2nd · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:34 pm

Riabi hasn't been voted yet.

VOTE: Riabi

AGar · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:54 pm

In post 26, implosion wrote:
In post 22, AGar wrote:
In post 19, implosion wrote:Flames isn't scummy though.

We have a sympathizer.

I never said Flames was scummy though. I said he had too many numbers and was being dumb.

And I never claimed to direct that line at you, it was a general observation in light of his being wagoned.

You followed up with a vote, then an "Oops, wrong vote." and switched.

Don't even try to play me a fool.

implosion · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 1:26 pm

My changing my vote has nothing to do with Flames not being scummy.

Riabi · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 2:08 pm

In post 27, tman2nd wrote:Riabi hasn't been voted yet.

VOTE: Riabi

VOTE: tman2nd

OMGUS.

rack · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 2:20 pm

VOTE: AGar

For getting that damned song stuck in my head.

Malakittens · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 2:27 pm

In post 27, tman2nd wrote:Riabi hasn't been voted yet.

VOTE: Riabi

Nor have I.

VOTE: riabi

implosion · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 2:36 pm

Malakittens just lied

.

phokdapolees · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 3:04 pm

Actually,
VOTE: Tammy
That condescension in post 16 feels like scum trying to brush off the srs vote from flames.

tman2nd · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 3:16 pm

In post 34, phokdapolees wrote:Actually,
VOTE: Tammy
That condescension in post 16 feels like scum trying to brush off the srs vote from flames.

I don't know if your being serious, but flames's vote wasn't serious.

implosion · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 3:20 pm

In post 35, tman2nd wrote:
In post 34, phokdapolees wrote:Actually,
VOTE: Tammy
That condescension in post 16 feels like scum trying to brush off the srs vote from flames.

I don't know if your being serious, but flames's vote wasn't serious.

Nope. Flames said it was serious. Ipso facto, it was serious.

rack · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 3:26 pm

In post 32, Malakittens wrote:
In post 27, tman2nd wrote:Riabi hasn't been voted yet.

VOTE: Riabi

Nor have I.

VOTE: riabi

But...

But......

But, wouldn't it make more sense to vote for tman?

So confused.

phokdapolees · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 3:38 pm

In post 35, tman2nd wrote:
In post 34, phokdapolees wrote:Actually,
VOTE: Tammy
That condescension in post 16 feels like scum trying to brush off the srs vote from flames.

I don't know if your being serious, but flames's vote wasn't serious.

In post 12, Flames682 wrote:VOTE: tAmMy

Very serious vote pls lynch him

This vote came right after Tammy voted him (and corrected her capitalization), so yeah, I'm pretty sure this a serious vote.

implosion · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 3:50 pm

VOTE: Rack
Serious vote.

Flames682 · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:50 pm

In post 38, phokdapolees wrote:
In post 35, tman2nd wrote:
In post 34, phokdapolees wrote:Actually,
VOTE: Tammy
That condescension in post 16 feels like scum trying to brush off the srs vote from flames.

I don't know if your being serious, but flames's vote wasn't serious.
In post 12, Flames682 wrote:VOTE: tAmMy

Very serious vote pls lynch him
This vote came right after Tammy voted him (and corrected her capitalization), so yeah, I'm pretty sure this a serious vote.

No it wasn't lol

phokdapolees · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 4:55 pm

In post 40, Flames682 wrote:
In post 38, phokdapolees wrote:
In post 35, tman2nd wrote:
In post 34, phokdapolees wrote:Actually,
VOTE: Tammy
That condescension in post 16 feels like scum trying to brush off the srs vote from flames.

I don't know if your being serious, but flames's vote wasn't serious.
In post 12, Flames682 wrote:VOTE: tAmMy

Very serious vote pls lynch him
This vote came right after Tammy voted him (and corrected her capitalization), so yeah, I'm pretty sure this a serious vote.

No it wasn't lol

In any case, Tammy's reaction to it was very scummy, regardless of whether the vote was serious or not.

Malakittens · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 5:18 pm

In post 37, rack wrote:
In post 32, Malakittens wrote:
In post 27, tman2nd wrote:Riabi hasn't been voted yet.

VOTE: Riabi

Nor have I.

VOTE: riabi

But...

But......

But, wouldn't it make more sense to vote for tman?

So confused.

Lmafo. I can't believe I actually did that.

VOTE: tman

(also imma probably keep forgetting 'bout this game. I never sign up for mini normals. this might actually be like 3rd if that on the site. ._.)

TAMMY
HEY
TAMMY.

Malakittens · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 5:20 pm

Phokd

you are threading in very dangerous waters

i applaud but you are gonna lose your life
if you keep going the way you are

phokdapolees · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 5:21 pm

In post 43, Malakittens wrote:Phokd

you are threading in very dangerous waters

i applaud but you are gonna lose your life
if you keep going the way you are

I always lose my life, might as well lose it pushing scum.

tman2nd · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 5:26 pm

In post 39, implosion wrote:VOTE: Rack
Serious vote.

Reason?

In post 41, phokdapolees wrote:
In post 40, Flames682 wrote:
In post 38, phokdapolees wrote:
In post 35, tman2nd wrote:
In post 34, phokdapolees wrote:Actually,
VOTE: Tammy
That condescension in post 16 feels like scum trying to brush off the srs vote from flames.

I don't know if your being serious, but flames's vote wasn't serious.
In post 12, Flames682 wrote:VOTE: tAmMy

Very serious vote pls lynch him
This vote came right after Tammy voted him (and corrected her capitalization), so yeah, I'm pretty sure this a serious vote.

No it wasn't lol
In any case, Tammy's reaction to it was very scummy, regardless of whether the vote was serious or not.

What was scummy about that reaction? He seemed to be continuing to joke around like they both had been.

implosion · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 5:28 pm

phok gets a very mild scumread.

@tman: post 37 is awkward. Lots of unwarranted ellipses, throw in a "so confused" at the end, and that's more than enough for a vote from me on page two. If desired I can explain in more depth why those are enough to warrant a vote from me on page two.

AGar · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 7:56 pm

In post 29, implosion wrote:My changing my vote has nothing to do with Flames not being scummy.

The vote at it's core does though.

That's what I'm saying.

You're a sympathizer, it's k.

Flames682 · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 7:59 pm

In post 41, phokdapolees wrote:
In post 40, Flames682 wrote:
In post 38, phokdapolees wrote:
In post 35, tman2nd wrote:
In post 34, phokdapolees wrote:Actually,
VOTE: Tammy
That condescension in post 16 feels like scum trying to brush off the srs vote from flames.

I don't know if your being serious, but flames's vote wasn't serious.
In post 12, Flames682 wrote:VOTE: tAmMy

Very serious vote pls lynch him
This vote came right after Tammy voted him (and corrected her capitalization), so yeah, I'm pretty sure this a serious vote.

No it wasn't lol
In any case, Tammy's reaction to it was very scummy, regardless of whether the vote was serious or not.

How was it scummy? We were both still joking.

In post 39, implosion wrote:VOTE: Rack
Serious vote.

I love when people give serious votes but give no reasoning at all.

AGar · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Sun Aug 17, 2014 8:38 pm

In post 38, phokdapolees wrote:
In post 35, tman2nd wrote:
In post 34, phokdapolees wrote:Actually,
VOTE: Tammy
That condescension in post 16 feels like scum trying to brush off the srs vote from flames.

I don't know if your being serious, but flames's vote wasn't serious.
In post 12, Flames682 wrote:VOTE: tAmMy

Very serious vote pls lynch him
This vote came right after Tammy voted him (and corrected her capitalization), so yeah, I'm pretty sure this a serious vote.