Mini 1602: Game Over

[Flames682]

Wow fail I didn't read post 46 from implosion

Ignore my 2nd quote

[phokdapolees]

Regardless of me being hilariously wrong about the srsness of flames' vote, my point still stands about Tammy trying to play it off.

[Riabi]

phok gets a very mild scumread.

@tman: post 37 is awkward. Lots of unwarranted ellipses, throw in a "so confused" at the end, and that's more than enough for a vote from me on page two. If desired I can explain in more depth why those are enough to warrant a vote from me on page two.

I'm interested in why. I mean, I agree it's awkward, but it just came off as a weak attempt at lightheartedness to me.

[Tammy]

Boy did I miss waking up with the sun!

Hi Implosion! lol and <3.

Hi Agar! What was flames being dumb about?

Hi mala! - why did you make post Post 43?

Phok - what was condescending about my Post 16? Do you think *i* thought the vote was serious? And did you read the entire exchange between flames and me?

I really liked implosions first post. I think he might be my first town read again.

I only briefly skimmed everything else because I only do self-absorbed readings before I get out of bed >_>

Damn I had another thought I thought. It left me so later.

[Malakittens]

Uh, because I don't see anything with wrong with your posts as of now. Just think he's not sure what a 1v1 with you entails

[Elias_the_thief]

I'm interested in why. I mean, I agree it's awkward, but it just came off as a weak attempt at lightheartedness to me.

What makes it a "weak attempt"? Are you implying that the post was insincere?

[Elias_the_thief]

@tman: post 37 is awkward. Lots of unwarranted ellipses, throw in a "so confused" at the end, and that's more than enough for a vote from me on page two. If desired I can explain in more depth why those are enough to warrant a vote from me on page two.

I'm interested in the more in-depth explanation. That post seems to check out as far as I can tell.

[Riabi]

I'm interested in why. I mean, I agree it's awkward, but it just came off as a weak attempt at lightheartedness to me.

What makes it a "weak attempt"? Are you implying that the post was insincere?

No, I don't think it was insincere, I just think that he was trying trying to be playful and instead of it coming across as playful, it came across as just awkward (to me, anyway).

[SleepyKrew]

VC 1.02

Flames682

(3) - Tammy, Elias_the_thief, AGar

rack

(2) - Aneninen, implosion

Tammy

(2) - Flames682, phokdapolees

tman2nd

(2) - Riabi, Malakittens

AGar

(1) - rack

Riabi

(1) - tman2nd

implosion

(1) - shaddowez

Not Voting

(1) - chaoslord54

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.
Day 1 deadline will hit in: (expired on 2014-08-31 16:48:15)

[rack]

Okay, so, this is absolutely,

definitely

scum!Tammy. Too forced, not at all like her town play.

VOTE: Tammy

[Elias_the_thief]

Okay, so, this is absolutely,

definitely

scum!Tammy. Too forced, not at all like her town play.

VOTE: Tammy

Do you have a completed game that you could show for reference? Hard to believe a meta read without some sort of evidence.

[Tammy]

Okay, so, this is absolutely,

definitely

scum!Tammy. Too forced, not at all like her town play.

VOTE: Tammy

*checks role pm*

Nope! My claim in my first post was indeed corect.

I've never played with you. If you're an alt and you think calling me scum when I'm obviously not is a good idea to either reaction test or cause a distraction, you're doing it wrong.

~~~~~

Mala - what I meant was why you made that post in the way you did? You didn't interact with why he was voting me just gave him a warning.

Oh I remember my thought from earlier.

Phok why did you ignore the person who said that if looked like we were joking around?

[rack]

The evidence of Tammy's scumminess can easily be found through a site search. I will not do your research for you.

[Riabi]

The evidence of Tammy's scumminess can easily be found through a site search. I will not do your research for you.

But, you're the one making the claim. IMO, the burden of proof is on you. You are the one that suggested a meta search makes her look guilty. If this is how you feel, show us evidence.

[rack]

No.

[Riabi]

No.

Well, that's fine then, but, I wouldn't expect too many folks to just take you at your word.

[Flames682]

Regardless of me being hilariously wrong about the srsness of flames' vote, my point still stands about Tammy trying to play it off.

It was obvious that she was still joking at that point, as was I. If you're seriously stubborn about a joke, you're probably scum trying to ML town.

VOTE: phokdapolees

[Flames682]

The evidence of Tammy's scumminess can easily be found through a site search. I will not do your research for you.

If it's so easy why can't you just pull up a game and link it?

[implosion]

hey, hey rack
this is Tammy's town meta from my experience
if you want confirmation, you can do a site search ^_^

[tman2nd]

I've noticed Tammy has been making lots of references to how she's town.

Never fear Town Tammy is here!

Now we just have to see if the mod will count votes cast on town.

*checks role pm*

Nope! My claim in my first post was indeed corect.

It's been in a joking manner, but seems like she's emphasizing her towniness to much. Does anyone know if this is normal for her?

[implosion]

Anywho, the more in-depth explanation (note that this will inevitably sound like reaching, because it is): the post (37) sounds overdramatic, i.e. it sounds like it's trying to make active attempts to look a certain way. This is particularly notable since rack's posting style overall seems fairly concise. The "but... but......" and "so confused" both contribute nothing to the actual content of the post, while contributing to the tone.

[implosion]

I've noticed Tammy has been making lots of references to how she's town.

Never fear Town Tammy is here!

Now we just have to see if the mod will count votes cast on town.

*checks role pm*

Nope! My claim in my first post was indeed corect.

It's been in a joking manner, but seems like she's emphasizing her towniness to much. Does anyone know if this is normal for her?

Yep.

From the opening post of the last game I played with Tammy (she was town):

Did anyone hear that sigh of relief earlier this afternoon? Yeah, that was me when I saw I was town. Empire's a terrible troll.

[implosion]

"Oh, what's that? rack and implosion are saying conflicting things and citing the same source of evidence, but implosion is providing specific evidence while rack is saying to go look for it yourself?

Gee, implosion, that sure is crazy! I'd better vote rack with you."

[tman2nd]

Ok, good. It did seem like something she might normally do. I think I'll go ahead and

VOTE: rack

He needs to cite his sources.

[Malakittens]

I've noticed Tammy has been making lots of references to how she's town.

Never fear Town Tammy is here!

Now we just have to see if the mod will count votes cast on town.

*checks role pm*

Nope! My claim in my first post was indeed corect.

It's been in a joking manner, but seems like she's emphasizing her towniness to much. Does anyone know if this is normal for her?

Yes.

@Tammy:

Maybe I'm scum partners with him and I told him to back off before he dies and I have to carry the team!