Alice in Wonderland - [Game Over!]

Natirasha · Post Post #1075 (ISO) » Mon Aug 18, 2014 8:59 am

In post 1073, Marquis wrote:
In post 1065, Prof Fridays wrote:What's your name-claim?

no

You can just say Alice, you know.

Prof Fridays · Post Post #1076 (ISO) » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:00 am

In post 1072, Prof Fridays wrote:I mean, I would totally Cop the two people in my neighborhood. Get rid of any scum in there, then strategize like crazy.

(I'm saying hypothetically if I was Vi in the Tea Party neighborhood.)

MattP · Post Post #1077 (ISO) » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:01 am

In post 1067, Natirasha wrote:You believe Vi wouldn't?

No

reinoe · Post Post #1078 (ISO) » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:01 am

Claim: Dormouse,

In case it wasn't obvious.

popcorn to Marquis.

His not claiming is a scumclaim.

Prof Fridays · Post Post #1079 (ISO) » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:02 am

In post 1075, Natirasha wrote:
In post 1073, Marquis wrote:
In post 1065, Prof Fridays wrote:What's your name-claim?

no

You can just say Alice, you know.

Sounds like one to me! Would go with the strange abilities they seem to have.

MattP · Post Post #1080 (ISO) » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:02 am

In post 1069, Prof Fridays wrote:WOW HEY MATTP THANKS FOR THE CONTRIBUTION.

*flips table*

Well, that was pretty melodramatic

Natirasha · Post Post #1081 (ISO) » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:02 am

reinoe, more.

You had a post restriction, outline it's details.

Why didn't you want to be Vanillaized?

Prof Fridays · Post Post #1082 (ISO) » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:02 am

In post 1080, MattP wrote:
In post 1069, Prof Fridays wrote:WOW HEY MATTP THANKS FOR THE CONTRIBUTION.

*flips table*

Well, that was pretty melodramatic

I try.

Marquis · Post Post #1083 (ISO) » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:04 am

In post 1023, Marquis wrote:
In post 976, reinoe wrote:Prof your setup spec is amazingly inaccurate.
For one because I would have to be an idiot to kill everyone at the tea party
, and two I softed the dormouse, and not any of the alices.

Also Vi being a likely PR/potentially-scum-discovered-cop trumps the whole "i wouldn't kill my neighbors" thing so

Marquis · Post Post #1084 (ISO) » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:04 am

In post 1081, Natirasha wrote:You had a post restriction, outline it's details.

he faked it

Marquis · Post Post #1085 (ISO) » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:05 am

In post 845, reinoe wrote:btw, for trololololo goodness I was faking the post restriction on day one. It was all for giggles.

and everyone else apparently looked over it in hindsight

Marquis · Post Post #1086 (ISO) » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:06 am

In post 1078, reinoe wrote:
Claim: Dormouse,

In case it wasn't obvious.

popcorn to Marquis.

His not claiming is a scumclaim.

i'm not claiming for you

in case anyone hasn't gotten it yet ascetic is a

modifier

Prof Fridays · Post Post #1087 (ISO) » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:06 am

All the same, we need to know what reinoe

was

.

Prof Fridays · Post Post #1088 (ISO) » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:07 am

In post 1086, Marquis wrote:
In post 1078, reinoe wrote:
Claim: Dormouse,

In case it wasn't obvious.

popcorn to Marquis.

His not claiming is a scumclaim.

i'm not claiming for you

in case anyone hasn't gotten it yet ascetic is a
modifier

Well, right, but seeing as how you can't be protected, what makes you think you'll survive through to tomorrow anyway? Especially now that you've freaking soft-claimed something else.

reinoe · Post Post #1089 (ISO) » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:07 am

In post 1081, Natirasha wrote:reinoe, more.

You had a post restriction, outline it's details.

Why didn't you want to be Vanillaized?

I was faking the post restriction for trollz lollz.

That's why I didn't want to be vanillaized. Because it wouldn't do anything. However the fact that Salamence vanillaized me after I said I didn't need it twice and didn't want it made me very suspicious of him.

Like if I did have a post restriction then it would make sense that I had some sort of PR to compensate. So by Sala vanillaizing me he could have neutralized a PR.

P:EDIT. I was just vanilla neighbor.

Le Cupcake · Post Post #1090 (ISO) » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:08 am

In post 1070, reinoe wrote:[rack, hiplop, mattp]

Three scum in here.

I agree wholeheartedly with this statement

reinoe · Post Post #1091 (ISO) » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:08 am

In post 1086, Marquis wrote:
In post 1078, reinoe wrote:
Claim: Dormouse,

In case it wasn't obvious.

popcorn to Marquis.

His not claiming is a scumclaim.

i'm not claiming for you

in case anyone hasn't gotten it yet ascetic is a
modifier

OK that's a scum claim then. More votes on Marquis please.

Natirasha · Post Post #1092 (ISO) » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:09 am

That's not smart, reinoe.

Natirasha · Post Post #1093 (ISO) » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:09 am

Marquis you're claiming today whether you want it or not.

reinoe · Post Post #1094 (ISO) » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:11 am

In post 1092, Natirasha wrote:That's not smart, reinoe.

What's not smart?

Natirasha · Post Post #1095 (ISO) » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:11 am

Faking a PR.

Le Cupcake · Post Post #1096 (ISO) » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:12 am

It was fine, reinoe made it clear he didnt want to be vanillarized.

OH WELL MARQUIS MATTP RACK HIPLOP ARONIS

WE ARE GETTING THESE CLAIMS TODAY

reinoe · Post Post #1097 (ISO) » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:12 am

In post 1095, Natirasha wrote:Faking a PR.

I suppose, but it was fun. I saw SleepyKrew do it in a Micro when he was posting only in Haiku...

Prof Fridays · Post Post #1098 (ISO) » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:13 am

I'd rather see Marquis die tonight, I think, than lynch him today. All the same, he needs to claim.

Le Cupcake · Post Post #1099 (ISO) » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:15 am

In post 1097, reinoe wrote:
In post 1095, Natirasha wrote:Faking a PR.

SleepyKrew

this is probably when you know it wasnt a very good idea