In post 649, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:I'm just trying to figure shit out and I cant do that when there are a million different wagons.
well, i can name all the people who's fault that is:
lying cat
BBT
josh
ZZZX
flubbernugget
In post 649, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:I'm just trying to figure shit out and I cant do that when there are a million different wagons.
In post 648, Heartless wrote:
...that's evenmorenonsensical...
so, now you're going to sit here, nitpick at me, and deny that him being on the flubberwagon was a factor at all, even though it should clearly be from your opinion of "flubberwagon was so scummy"
i'm done with you. your scummy colors have already shown.
In post 651, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 648, Heartless wrote:
...that's evenmorenonsensical...
so, now you're going to sit here, nitpick at me, and deny that him being on the flubberwagon was a factor at all, even though it should clearly be from your opinion of "flubberwagon was so scummy"
i'm done with you. your scummy colors have already shown.
I gave you my reasons for why I was scum-reading Josh. You tried to suggest it was for other reasons so that they fit into your now falling apart case. That is misrepresenting and misleading.
The flubber wagon was scum-driven.Scum-driven. Am I scum-reading GG? No. Am I scum-reading awestfie? No. A lot of my read on you came from that attack on FN and now this awful case you have tried to put together on me.
I'd be done with me as well if I realized I'd just made a pretty bad move.
In post 654, Heartless wrote:like, seriously
ask him why he didn't vote Josh.
the answer so far is "well I wasn't scumreading josh for [reason X you said], it's because of [reason Y you didn't say]."
that doesn't answer the question AND THAT'S NOT A TOWN RESPONSE
In post 639, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
I voted LC to try and run her up and see if I could get a better read from their reaction to a growing wagon on them.
In post 550, awestfie wrote:Most of it is just things people have already said and I fail to see how they only read so little despite having 3+ days to catch up.
In post 555, awestfie wrote:"You" being sthar, of course.
Hydra is not a "play style," it's just that you've someone you can one-hundred-percent trust with your reads, but it shouldn't mean you should live up to them. You're still free to post, even if the other head isn't around; posts shouldn't only be made when both heads are there. Hydras should disagree with some reads and I'm not seeing that at all from LC. Matter of fact, if you ISO LC's post, you'll mostly see "I" and not "we," why is that? Jingle is scared to post and I don't see why she (he?) would be as town.
Not you.
In post 592, awestfie wrote:
In post 548, awestfie wrote:Much like your posts, it's bad.
1) Cool.
2) Same as above.
3) Again, cool. How does this make you town, exactly? Am I supposed to read your mind and know that you're an IRL hydra?
In post 611, awestfie wrote:I waited for you to postforgame related content, all you came back with was the interactions TSO and GG had and then, you proceeded to vote in the two. I found it odd that if only one of the hydra was away then why was the other head of the hydra not posting? Clearly, none of this is3 days.game related
Again, am I supposed to stupidly read your mind and know that you two are a IRL hydra? I saw a huge lack of communication between the two in the majority of your posts. It mostly seemed like "I" and not "we," and a scum hydra wouldn't have to discuss reads much with each other, since all they have to do is fake reads. Again, none of this is.game related
You got me.
In post 616, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:VOTE: LyingCat
Yeah. Let's see where this goes.
Also, all this meta talk is driving me insane. Let's stop that.
In post 620, Heartless wrote:>the criticism of the flubber wagon (even though precisely ZERO fuckingscumreads came from the wagon)
>the irritatingly long time it's taking to waffle on us
>the vote parking on TSO (a zero accountability vote) for the longest time
and now...
>the random jump onto lying cat with no reads progression following from recent posting
lying cat wasn't anywhere near the flubber wagon. if you want to sit here andswear up and fucking down that the flubber wagon was on scum, then your scumreads should follow from that,but they don't
it's flubber/bbt scumteam
gg
In post 621, Heartless wrote:meanwhile at the legion of doom....
Spoiler:
:activelurking:
:scumposting:
In post 632, Heartless wrote:>flubber's wagon is "easy" (even though it magically disintegrates) but bad boy lying cat wagon is all cool
>lying cat isn't even a scumread
>josh is a scumread and abunchof people talk about him being scum, buti'll never vote him
>flubber's wagon wassoooooooooooooscum driven, but maybe it's not because there's some good points, but heartless is "leaning" scum because blahablhblahlkdjsaf;jds;lkajf;lkdsajf;lkdsaj;lkfdsajfsalk; /fart
seriously, BBT's "reads" are a big, tangled, fucked up web that doesn't connect to theactions(the vote patterns).
forget logic. the simple fact of the matter is that he's not pushing the lynch that follows from his reads (josh), he's pushingalynch.
In post 657, Heartless wrote:did i ask about lying cat?
did i mention lying cat?
am i now talking about lying cat?
am i talking about a pressure vote?
no.
why was your vote never (and continues to not be) on josh?
BlueBloodedToffee - [2] - Heartless, T S O
Flubbernugget - [1] - Josh_B
T S O - [1] - ZZZX
Guilty Gunsmith - [1] - Lying Cat
Heartless - [1] - BlueBloodedToffee
awestfie - [1] - Flubbernugget
In post 660, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:
Heartless - [1] - BlueBloodedToffee
No.
@BBT: Heartless is town. You're very clearly OMGUS-voting them. There's no other reason as far as I can tell. If you want to talk about "wagons that aren't going anywhere" - you're on one.
In post 662, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:Yes, that's why he's pushing anything that has the faintest scent of scum. Because he's scum pushing (more than 2) chosen townies. /sarcasm
Your resistance to the Flubber wagon is suspicious whether you want to believe it or not. You jumping onto Heartless because they pointed this out is suspicious whether you want to believe it or not.
Do I agree with his suspicion of you? Not really. Do I think that makes him scum despite everything else they've done thus far? Absolutely not.
Your vote on Heartless is not only a bad vote in terms of who it's on, but it's not doing anything.
ETL
In post 663, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Aside from FN and myself, who do you think he has pushed?
In post 639, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Josh was a scum-read for his buddying and looking for direction in the game. I'm sure you already knew this though; but given it doesn't fit into your case, it can be disregarded right?
In post 667, T S O wrote:How are you not voting this guy, ETL?
In post 665, Guilty Gunsmith wrote:You're not evaluating their play as a whole. You're only reacting to Anti's vote on you.
In post 667, T S O wrote:"I developed scumreads on both Josh and TSO. I knew they couldn't be scum together, though, so Ibegan to talk to both of them and did my best to determine which one of them was scumvoteparked on TSO for ages, before Isorted TSO as town/scumvoted Joshsorted Josh as town/scumopportunistically voted some other person after they called me scum."
How are you not voting this guy, ETL?
In post 668, Josh_B wrote:
I have been waiting for you to say this for a while.
I'm going to take your hesitation as a town tell. And I'm going to take anti calling you out on it as a town tell too.
In post 514, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
It's more than asking people questions though isn't it. It looks like buddying, you're asking people for direction instead of trying to figure the game out for yourself. Three separate people as well, so it's not like you even care who it is, just so long as someone is helping you.
In post 672, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Fuck you sthar. You got your shit, I got mine.