NY 177: Simple Complexity (GAME OVER: Scum Wins!)

[RoyalApe]

Ugh the Q+ button isn't working on my phone.

@Alina
At first I was just using RoyalApe's vote to get us out of RVS (his random reason didn't make much sense), but I didn't like his subsequent reactions and

avoidance of my questions

. It's a serious vote for now but not a strong scumread in the slightest because he is new. I'll have to see how he plays and reacts more to determine if his scummy behavior is part of his play style or not.

@texcat
Yes, I only found RoyalApe's vote worth questioning. Do you see any other votes that need questioning? If so, why haven't you questioned them yourself?

@farside
Please tell me what I am missing in the thread by focusing on RoyalApe.

The bolded is flat incorrect. I felt I answered your question sufficiently the first time (44) and the second time you asked (80) and the third time you asked (106).

It was you that avoided answering my question from post 44 in your reply on post 73. I didn't follow up on my 2nd answer, but I did in my 3rd. You finally answered in post 107

[notscience]

Scumhunting sucks.

[RoyalApe]

With absolutely nothing else to go on, seemed like as good of a reason as anybody else has used so far. VOTE: Elyse for tunneling onto a RVS vote.

Considering she only posted once asking about this (at the time, I realize there have been more since), why are you claiming she's tunneling?

It was the second time she asked.

[Elyse]

You didn't answer my question at all actually. Here I'll give you another chance:

Did you vote OkaPoka for wanting to lynch someone too early or for being anxious?

[Elyse]

And your question was clearly rhetoric "should I be poking you? Hmmmm?" even if you're saying it's not now.

[tree]

This game is getting nowhere.

Claim: Innocent Child

Bow down bitches, bow, bow down bitches.

[Psyche]

okay

[gameplay506]

vote reinoe

like sort of srsly

i will now

vote reinoe

for not being a team player

So what was the serious thing in the first vote?

I don't like you Psyche

VOTE: Psyche

[Josh_B]

VOTE: RoyalApe
Why did you choose OkaPoka over Aeronaut or farside?

Do you think Aeronaut and farside want to lynch the person they're voting for?

If not, then what about OkaPoka's vote makes you think he actually wants to lynch reinoe?

It was the first vote of the day.

If I'm poking somebody for being anxious, why would I vote for people that were after Oka?

Are you defending Oka? Do I need to be poking you instead? Hmmm?

VOTE: RoyalApe
Why did you choose OkaPoka over Aeronaut or farside?

Do you think Aeronaut and farside want to lynch the person they're voting for?

If not, then what about OkaPoka's vote makes you think he actually wants to lynch reinoe?

It was the first vote of the day.

If I'm poking somebody for being anxious, why would I vote for people that were after Oka?

Are you defending Oka? Do I need to be poking you instead? Hmmm?

I thought you were voting Oka for being quick to want to lynch someone? Why do you think he's anxious?

Oh dammit Elyse. He answered your freaking question. You responded to it with your own made up reason. It was a damn RVS vote. Now you are like "fuck the reason you told me, the answer is one of the choices that I'm giving you, bitch!" royalape was right to not respond to your dumbass question because you keep asking it, and he already answered.

VOTE: elyse

[Psyche]

vote reinoe

like sort of srsly

i will now

vote reinoe

for not being a team player

:?:

So what was the serious thing in the first vote?

I don't like you Psyche

VOTE: Psyche

it was the aspiration for reinoe's lynch

[Elyse]

@Josh
Look at my post and tell me which question that is an answer to.

[farside22]

Ugh the Q+ button isn't working on my phone.

@Alina
At first I was just using RoyalApe's vote to get us out of RVS (his random reason didn't make much sense), but I didn't like his subsequent reactions and avoidance of my questions. It's a serious vote for now but not a strong scumread in the slightest because he is new. I'll have to see how he plays and reacts more to determine if his scummy behavior is part of his play style or not.

@texcat
Yes, I only found RoyalApe's vote worth questioning. Do you see any other votes that need questioning? If so, why haven't you questioned them yourself?

@farside
Please tell me what I am missing in the thread by focusing on RoyalApe.

Your point is worthless. Many a people vote the first person. Ape's reaction reads as why the hell is this suspicious unless your defending the player he voted.

[farside22]

@Josh
Look at my post and tell me which question that is an answer to.

Someone is making a big to do about an rvs vote.

[farside22]

VOTE: reinoe

no gambits for you

VOTE: Vote: OkaPoka, you couldn't even wait 5 minutes before you felt the urge to lynch somebody. EVIL.

It's called a joke vote.

Why elyse did you take this a serious?

[Aeronaut]

Elyse, is this the post in question?

VOTE: reinoe

no gambits for you

VOTE: Vote: OkaPoka, you couldn't even wait 5 minutes before you felt the urge to lynch somebody. EVIL.

This is very obviously a joke. It's funny because he's voting someone during RVS for voicing someone during RVS. It's a page 2 RVS joke. Either you really don't see it, you're scum trying to jump on a non-reason lynch. I'm thinking the latter.

VOTE: Elyse

P-edit: Yes, yes, and yes to the last three posts

[Elyse]

I said already I'm trying to get out of RVS.

Do you think this is part of my grand scum plan or something? Why don't you lay off and let me pressure someone and instead of complaining about me, do something yourself!

P-edit:


Ugh I'm already over this game.

[Elyse]

It's ok though because we're out of RVS! (Despite reinoe and co trying to keep us in it)

Now when you all realize that voting me for pressuring an RVS vote is stupid, we can get on with the game. If you seriously think scum would do this and try to ride it out to a lynch on RoyalApe, then lol ok.

[T S O]

The scumcase on Elyse bores me.

[Aeronaut]

Elyse, do you have reads besides this?

[Majiffy]

VOTE: Tree

[RoyalApe]

You didn't answer my question at all actually. Here I'll give you another chance:

Did you vote OkaPoka for wanting to lynch someone too early or for being anxious?

Just because I didn't answer my question the way you wanted me to, doesn't mean that I didn't answer your question.

I didn't want to lynch Oka for lynching someone too early or for being anxious. I wanted to make a RVS vote.

"should I be poking you? Hmmmm?"

You flat didn't answer my actual question (were you defending Oka?) until I followed up. Why did you only quote the line "should I be poking you? Hmmmm?" When the full quote was "

Are you defending Oka?

Do I need to be poking you instead? Hmmm?".

If your goal is to annoy me, you have succeeded. And now my question is why is that your goal?

[RoyalApe]

Correction to my prior post:
Just because I didn't answer

your

question the way you wanted me to, doesn't mean that I didn't answer your question.

[Wake1]

Vote Count 1.1

reinoe (4):

OkaPoka, tn5421, T S O, Psyche

Elyse (3):

PeregrineV, Farside22, Aeronaut

Psyche (2):

Gameplay506, Josh_B

Tree (1):

Majiffy

OkaPoka (1):

RoyalApe

RoyalApe (1):

Elyse

notscience (1):

reinoe

Shaddowez (1):

Alina

Aeronaut (1):

Shaddowez

Mirhawk (1):

Tree

Not Voting (5):

The Light, mirhawk, notscience, Aegor, texcat

~ With 21 players alive, it takes 11 to lynch!
~ Deadline expires 9/3/14, @8am central.

~ Game Reviewers; Mykonian, Empking, & Mastin2.

~ Posting Vote Counts more frequently.
~ Neat pics added in VCs for eye candy.

OP | Game Rules | Day Start
1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.10 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.13 | 1.14 | 1.15 | 1.16 | 1.17 | 1.18 | 1.19
Aegor's Lynch & Flip
Elyse and T S O's Murders & Flips
2.1 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.4
Aeronaut's Lynch & Flip
Texcat and Josh_B's Murders & Flips
3.1 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 3.9
tn5421's Lynch & Flip
Titus's Murder & Flip
4.1 | 4.2 | 4.3
OkaPoka's Lynch & Flip
Majiffy and Mirhawk's Murders & Flips
5.1 | 5.2 | 5.3 | 5.4 | 5.5
PeregrineV's Lynch & Flip
Gameplay506 and notsciences' Murders & Flips
6.1 | 6.2 | 6.3

[OkaPoka]

Ugh guys stop wondering. I saw Wake posting and earlier version of this setup. Everyone was in a neighboorhood there and there was something.in addition. I will kepp it.for myself tho.

This is a Closed Setup. Players won't know exactly what PRs are at play, if any.

Ugh ye this and something else bring me to the idea it's mountanious. Also Wake basically wants to make only mountanious games so.

Speculating about setup like a boss.

Will knowing more about the setup help us find scum? I thought the object of this was to find (and kill) the scum.

It is always useful!

wait, I thought you hated speculation?


what is mountainous?

gameplay. reply to my first question.

[tree]

VOTE: Tree

Just because you're cool enough to vote the IC doesn't mean you're not scum.

VOTE: Majiffy