I had at the time no confidence in my scumreads and most of the rest I was seeing around town looked just as bad.
This is exactly what I was doing. I'm pretty sure I made that explicit.
In post 1368, tn5421 wrote:
How the fuck can someone GAMBIT with ICs and Dayvigs but GOD FORBID SOMEONE FUCKING SOFTCLAIM LOL PILE ON THE WAGON
If your beef on this is directed at me why are you pursuing this with Elyse?
In post 1392, gameplay506 wrote:
Where does he flip flops btw?
Also I dont think he is being aggresive because of the wagon.
Also your reasons are pretty outdated.
Gameplay apparently earned mad town cheddar with his Aero defense, but I still want to point out how abjectly terrible this post is.
Aero does flip flop, he's admitted to it.
He was definitely being aggressive, his interactions with notscience in particular.
How could those reasons have been outdated if they were both false?
In post 1395, Aeronaut wrote:
I just want everyone to read that sentence a few times. In what world is hypocrisy not scummy? If you were to vote me for voting for tree,
while voting for tree,
then you'd be pretty fucking hypocritical, and you'd be scum.
In post 1302, Mirhawk wrote:
@Aero
It would save a lot of time if you just claimed now
. I'm not going elsewhere until that softclaim nonsense has been resolved.
Um... are you rolefishing? I mean, I'm obviously very close to being lynched, but it would seem very easy for scum to ask for my role, then back off the vote as you said, kill another townie, and then kill me in the night.
Right now for me, Elyse is starting to make me uneasy. I'm pretty sure she had other points, but she keeps harping on the other one. It's weird. Mirhawk is acting really different than NY175, and the was sort of rolefishing. Don't like that. TSO is along for the wagon ride, weeeee! Tree came back and is being helpful again. Why, tree why? Why now? Why not yesterday? Whatever. If he's helping the town again, I'm not voting him.
Don't get me started on this hypocrisy shit again Aero. Hypocrisy isn't directly scummy unless you can directly prove why it's scummy, just like anything else.
A) You weren't all that close to being lynched when I voted. I didn't have any interest in running you to L-1, I wanted a claim.
B) I wasn't rolefishing, I was outright demanding your role. Those are two different things.
He's being useless in general. Is there something more specific you had in mind?
In post 1438, Aeronaut wrote:Well, since you people have made it glaringly obvious, yea. Thank you, role fish.
Right. Because it wasn't glaringly obvious the instant you softclaimed.
I wasn't aware this was a secret. I thought everyone knew.
In post 1494, Aeronaut wrote:Wouldn't scum want to target a group of people who can talk privately with eachother, day and night?
Only if there aren't scum inside that group. Which is unlikely.
In post 1563, Aeronaut wrote:Bolding it so skimmers can see.
I am a Town-Aligned Gunsmith. I investigate a person every night, and then I get either "Gun" or "No Gun". That is my role., it's sort of lame.
What result do you get if you are roleblocked?
That's precisely why I was running him up.
This is stupid. Catching people making small mistakes isn't alignment indicative. It just means they have a shitty memory. You've been doing this all game in lieu of actual scumhunting.
In post 1678, Alina wrote:
@Aeronaut
Did you breadcrumb at all? I assume not, since you likely would have mentioned it in your claim, but still.
Perhaps Aero's version of breadcrumbing is to loudly make it extremely obvious he has a PR, then pretend he didn't do so.
